litecoin/src/policy/rbf.cpp
glozow fa47622e8d scripted-diff: rename variables in policy/rbf
"Fee Delta" is already a term used for prioritizing transactions:
modified = base fees + delta

Here, delta also means the difference between original and modified replacement fees:
nDeltaFees = (original_base + original_delta) - (replacement_base + replacement_delta)

This is insanely confusing. Also, since mempool is no longer a member of a
class (MemPoolAccept.m_pool), the "m" prefix is unnecessary. The rest are
clarity/style-focused changes to already-touched lines.

-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-

ren() { sed -i "s/\<$1\>/$2/g" src/policy/rbf* ; }

ren nDeltaFees additional_fees
ren m_pool pool

ren nSize replacement_vsize
ren nModifiedFees replacement_fees
ren nConflictingFees original_fees
ren oldFeeRate original_feerate
ren newFeeRate replacement_feerate

ren setAncestors ancestors
ren setIterConflicting iters_conflicting
ren setConflictsParents parents_of_conflicts
ren setConflicts direct_conflicts
ren allConflicting all_conflicts

sed -i "s/ hash\b/ txid/g" src/policy/rbf*
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
2021-09-02 16:23:27 +01:00

190 lines
7.7 KiB
C++

// Copyright (c) 2016-2020 The Bitcoin Core developers
// Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying
// file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
#include <policy/rbf.h>
#include <policy/settings.h>
#include <tinyformat.h>
#include <util/moneystr.h>
#include <util/rbf.h>
RBFTransactionState IsRBFOptIn(const CTransaction& tx, const CTxMemPool& pool)
{
AssertLockHeld(pool.cs);
CTxMemPool::setEntries ancestors;
// First check the transaction itself.
if (SignalsOptInRBF(tx)) {
return RBFTransactionState::REPLACEABLE_BIP125;
}
// If this transaction is not in our mempool, then we can't be sure
// we will know about all its inputs.
if (!pool.exists(tx.GetHash())) {
return RBFTransactionState::UNKNOWN;
}
// If all the inputs have nSequence >= maxint-1, it still might be
// signaled for RBF if any unconfirmed parents have signaled.
uint64_t noLimit = std::numeric_limits<uint64_t>::max();
std::string dummy;
CTxMemPoolEntry entry = *pool.mapTx.find(tx.GetHash());
pool.CalculateMemPoolAncestors(entry, ancestors, noLimit, noLimit, noLimit, noLimit, dummy, false);
for (CTxMemPool::txiter it : ancestors) {
if (SignalsOptInRBF(it->GetTx())) {
return RBFTransactionState::REPLACEABLE_BIP125;
}
}
return RBFTransactionState::FINAL;
}
RBFTransactionState IsRBFOptInEmptyMempool(const CTransaction& tx)
{
// If we don't have a local mempool we can only check the transaction itself.
return SignalsOptInRBF(tx) ? RBFTransactionState::REPLACEABLE_BIP125 : RBFTransactionState::UNKNOWN;
}
std::optional<std::string> GetEntriesForConflicts(const CTransaction& tx,
CTxMemPool& pool,
const CTxMemPool::setEntries& iters_conflicting,
CTxMemPool::setEntries& all_conflicts)
{
AssertLockHeld(pool.cs);
const uint256 txid = tx.GetHash();
uint64_t nConflictingCount = 0;
for (const auto& mi : iters_conflicting) {
nConflictingCount += mi->GetCountWithDescendants();
// This potentially overestimates the number of actual descendants
// but we just want to be conservative to avoid doing too much
// work.
if (nConflictingCount > MAX_BIP125_REPLACEMENT_CANDIDATES) {
return strprintf("rejecting replacement %s; too many potential replacements (%d > %d)\n",
txid.ToString(),
nConflictingCount,
MAX_BIP125_REPLACEMENT_CANDIDATES);
}
}
// If not too many to replace, then calculate the set of
// transactions that would have to be evicted
for (CTxMemPool::txiter it : iters_conflicting) {
pool.CalculateDescendants(it, all_conflicts);
}
return std::nullopt;
}
std::optional<std::string> HasNoNewUnconfirmed(const CTransaction& tx,
const CTxMemPool& pool,
const CTxMemPool::setEntries& iters_conflicting)
{
AssertLockHeld(pool.cs);
std::set<uint256> parents_of_conflicts;
for (const auto& mi : iters_conflicting) {
for (const CTxIn &txin : mi->GetTx().vin)
{
parents_of_conflicts.insert(txin.prevout.hash);
}
}
for (unsigned int j = 0; j < tx.vin.size(); j++)
{
// We don't want to accept replacements that require low
// feerate junk to be mined first. Ideally we'd keep track of
// the ancestor feerates and make the decision based on that,
// but for now requiring all new inputs to be confirmed works.
//
// Note that if you relax this to make RBF a little more useful,
// this may break the CalculateMempoolAncestors RBF relaxation,
// above. See the comment above the first CalculateMempoolAncestors
// call for more info.
if (!parents_of_conflicts.count(tx.vin[j].prevout.hash))
{
// Rather than check the UTXO set - potentially expensive -
// it's cheaper to just check if the new input refers to a
// tx that's in the mempool.
if (pool.exists(tx.vin[j].prevout.hash)) {
return strprintf("replacement %s adds unconfirmed input, idx %d",
tx.GetHash().ToString(), j);
}
}
}
return std::nullopt;
}
std::optional<std::string> EntriesAndTxidsDisjoint(const CTxMemPool::setEntries& ancestors,
const std::set<uint256>& direct_conflicts,
const uint256& txid)
{
for (CTxMemPool::txiter ancestorIt : ancestors)
{
const uint256 &hashAncestor = ancestorIt->GetTx().GetHash();
if (direct_conflicts.count(hashAncestor))
{
return strprintf("%s spends conflicting transaction %s",
txid.ToString(),
hashAncestor.ToString());
}
}
return std::nullopt;
}
std::optional<std::string> PaysMoreThanConflicts(const CTxMemPool::setEntries& iters_conflicting,
CFeeRate replacement_feerate,
const uint256& txid)
{
for (const auto& mi : iters_conflicting) {
// Don't allow the replacement to reduce the feerate of the
// mempool.
//
// We usually don't want to accept replacements with lower
// feerates than what they replaced as that would lower the
// feerate of the next block. Requiring that the feerate always
// be increased is also an easy-to-reason about way to prevent
// DoS attacks via replacements.
//
// We only consider the feerates of transactions being directly
// replaced, not their indirect descendants. While that does
// mean high feerate children are ignored when deciding whether
// or not to replace, we do require the replacement to pay more
// overall fees too, mitigating most cases.
CFeeRate original_feerate(mi->GetModifiedFee(), mi->GetTxSize());
if (replacement_feerate <= original_feerate)
{
return strprintf("rejecting replacement %s; new feerate %s <= old feerate %s",
txid.ToString(),
replacement_feerate.ToString(),
original_feerate.ToString());
}
}
return std::nullopt;
}
std::optional<std::string> PaysForRBF(CAmount original_fees,
CAmount replacement_fees,
size_t replacement_vsize,
const uint256& txid)
{
// The replacement must pay greater fees than the transactions it
// replaces - if we did the bandwidth used by those conflicting
// transactions would not be paid for.
if (replacement_fees < original_fees)
{
return strprintf("rejecting replacement %s, less fees than conflicting txs; %s < %s",
txid.ToString(), FormatMoney(replacement_fees), FormatMoney(original_fees));
}
// Finally in addition to paying more fees than the conflicts the
// new transaction must pay for its own bandwidth.
CAmount additional_fees = replacement_fees - original_fees;
if (additional_fees < ::incrementalRelayFee.GetFee(replacement_vsize))
{
return strprintf("rejecting replacement %s, not enough additional fees to relay; %s < %s",
txid.ToString(),
FormatMoney(additional_fees),
FormatMoney(::incrementalRelayFee.GetFee(replacement_vsize)));
}
return std::nullopt;
}