80a699fda9
693414d27181cf967f787a2ca72344e52c58c7f0 node/ifaces: ChainImpl: Use an accessor for ChainMan (Carl Dong) 98c4e252f0d09bebb2e4ad3289407459c2cda5d5 node/ifaces: NodeImpl: Use an accessor for ChainMan (Carl Dong) 7e8b5ee814b0b8c34acb20637ed4fc988ccba555 validation: Make BlockManager::LookupBlockIndex const (Carl Dong) 88aead263c61d86e5f836028f517cfbf2a575498 node: Avoid potential UB by asserting assumptions (Carl Dong) 1dd8ed7a8491e51b76eeb236b15b794d9254f674 net_processing: Move comments to declarations (Carl Dong) 07156eb387ea580be5e2ce4a1744992ce7575903 node/coinstats: Replace #include with fwd-declaration (Carl Dong) 7b8e976cd5ac78a22f1be2b2fed8562c693af5d9 miner: Add chainstate member to BlockAssembler (Carl Dong) e62067e7bcad5a559899afff2e4a8e8b7e9f4301 Revert "miner: Pass in chainstate to BlockAssembler::CreateNewBlock" (Carl Dong) eede0647b06b6009080c4e536a2705e911d6ee19 Revert "scripted-diff: Invoke CreateNewBlock with chainstate" (Carl Dong) 0c1b2bc549aec77b247f0103652d883227841ac5 Revert "miner: Remove old CreateNewBlock w/o chainstate param" (Carl Dong) Pull request description: Chronological history of this changeset: 1. Bundle 4 (#21270) got merged 2. Posthumous reviews were posted 3. These changes were prepended in bundle 5 4. More reviews were added in bundle 5 5. Someone suggested that we split the prepended changes up to another PR 6. This is that PR In the future, I will just do posthumous review changes in another PR instead. I apologize for the confusion. Addresses posthumous reviews on bundle 4: - From jnewbery: - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21270#issuecomment-796738048 - I didn't fix this one, but I added a `TODO` comment so that we don't lost track of it - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21270#discussion_r592291225 - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21270#discussion_r592296942 - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21270#discussion_r592299738 - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21270#discussion_r592301704 - From MarcoFalke: - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21270#discussion_r593096212 - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21270#discussion_r593097032 - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21270#discussion_r593097867 - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21270#discussion_r593100570 Addresses reviews on bundle 5: - Checking chainman existence before locking cs_main - MarcoFalke - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21391#discussion_r596601776 - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21391#discussion_r596601876 - Appropriate locking, usage of chainman, and control flow in `src/node/interfaces.cpp` - MarcoFalke - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21391#discussion_r596601383 - jnewbery - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21391#discussion_r597029360 - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21391#discussion_r597029921 - ryanofsky - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21391#discussion_r597163828 - Style/comment formatting changes - jnewbery - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21391#discussion_r597026552 - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21391#discussion_r597027186 - Making LookupBlockIndex const - jnewbery - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21391#discussion_r597035062 ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: review ACK 693414d27181cf967f787a2ca72344e52c58c7f0 🛐 ryanofsky: Code review ACK 693414d27181cf967f787a2ca72344e52c58c7f0. I reviewed this previously as part of #21391. I am a fan of the increasingly complicated bundle numbering, and kind of hope there in the next round there is some way we can get bundles 5.333333 and 5.666667! jamesob: ACK 693414d27181cf967f787a2ca72344e52c58c7f0 ([`jamesob/ackr/21525.1.dongcarl.bundle_4_5_n_followup_f`](https://github.com/jamesob/bitcoin/tree/ackr/21525.1.dongcarl.bundle_4_5_n_followup_f)) Tree-SHA512: 9bdc199f70400d01764e1bd03c25bdb6cff26dcef60e4ca3b649baf8d017a2dfc1f058099067962b4b6ccd32d078002b1389d733039f4c337558cb70324c0ee3
Test library
This contains files for the test library, which is used by the test binaries (unit tests, benchmarks, fuzzers, gui tests).
Generally, the files in this folder should be well-separated modules. New code should be added to existing modules or (when in doubt) a new module should be created.
The utilities in here are compiled into a library, which does not hold any state. However, the main file setup_common
defines the common test setup for all test binaries. The test binaries will handle the global state when they
instantiate the BasicTestingSetup (or one of its derived classes).