W. J. van der Laan 8f1c28a609
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#21879: refactor: wrap accept() and extend usage of Sock
6bf6e9fd9dece67878595a5f3361851c25833c49 net: change CreateNodeFromAcceptedSocket() to take Sock (Vasil Dimov)
9e3cbfca7c9efa620c0cce73503772805cc1fa82 net: use Sock in CConnman::ListenSocket (Vasil Dimov)
f8bd13f85ae5404adef23a52719d804a5c36b1e8 net: add new method Sock::Accept() that wraps accept() (Vasil Dimov)

Pull request description:

  _This is a piece of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21878, chopped off to ease review._

  Introduce an `accept(2)` wrapper `Sock::Accept()` and extend the usage of `Sock` in `CConnman::ListenSocket` and `CreateNodeFromAcceptedSocket()`.

ACKs for top commit:
  laanwj:
    Code review ACK 6bf6e9fd9dece67878595a5f3361851c25833c49
  jamesob:
    ACK 6bf6e9fd9dece67878595a5f3361851c25833c49 ([`jamesob/ackr/21879.2.vasild.wrap_accept_and_extend_u`](https://github.com/jamesob/bitcoin/tree/ackr/21879.2.vasild.wrap_accept_and_extend_u))
  jonatack:
    ACK 6bf6e9fd9dece67878595a5f3361851c25833c49 per `git range-diff ea989de 976f6e8 6bf6e9f` -- only change since my last review was `s/listen_socket.socket/listen_socket.sock->Get()/` in `src/net.cpp: CConnman::SocketHandlerListening()` -- re-read the code changes, rebase/debug build/ran units following my previous full review (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21879#pullrequestreview-761251278)
  w0xlt:
    tACK 6bf6e9f

Tree-SHA512: dc6d1acc4f255f1f7e8cf6dd74e97975cf3d5959e9fc2e689f74812ac3526d5ee8b6a32eca605925d10a4f7b6ff1ce5e900344311e587d19786b48c54d021b64
2022-01-05 15:32:53 +01:00
..
2021-11-12 12:05:00 -05:00
2021-11-01 14:20:56 +01:00
2021-09-16 18:02:55 -04:00

Unit tests

The sources in this directory are unit test cases. Boost includes a unit testing framework, and since Bitcoin Core already uses Boost, it makes sense to simply use this framework rather than require developers to configure some other framework (we want as few impediments to creating unit tests as possible).

The build system is set up to compile an executable called test_bitcoin that runs all of the unit tests. The main source file for the test library is found in util/setup_common.cpp.

Compiling/running unit tests

Unit tests will be automatically compiled if dependencies were met in ./configure and tests weren't explicitly disabled.

After configuring, they can be run with make check.

To run the unit tests manually, launch src/test/test_bitcoin. To recompile after a test file was modified, run make and then run the test again. If you modify a non-test file, use make -C src/test to recompile only what's needed to run the unit tests.

To add more unit tests, add BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE functions to the existing .cpp files in the test/ directory or add new .cpp files that implement new BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE sections.

To run the GUI unit tests manually, launch src/qt/test/test_bitcoin-qt

To add more GUI unit tests, add them to the src/qt/test/ directory and the src/qt/test/test_main.cpp file.

Running individual tests

test_bitcoin has some built-in command-line arguments; for example, to run just the getarg_tests verbosely:

test_bitcoin --log_level=all --run_test=getarg_tests -- DEBUG_LOG_OUT

log_level controls the verbosity of the test framework, which logs when a test case is entered, for example. The DEBUG_LOG_OUT after the two dashes redirects the debug log, which would normally go to a file in the test datadir (BasicTestingSetup::m_path_root), to the standard terminal output.

... or to run just the doubledash test:

test_bitcoin --run_test=getarg_tests/doubledash

Run test_bitcoin --help for the full list.

Adding test cases

To add a new unit test file to our test suite you need to add the file to src/Makefile.test.include. The pattern is to create one test file for each class or source file for which you want to create unit tests. The file naming convention is <source_filename>_tests.cpp and such files should wrap their tests in a test suite called <source_filename>_tests. For an example of this pattern, see uint256_tests.cpp.

Logging and debugging in unit tests

make check will write to a log file foo_tests.cpp.log and display this file on failure. For running individual tests verbosely, refer to the section above.

To write to logs from unit tests you need to use specific message methods provided by Boost. The simplest is BOOST_TEST_MESSAGE.

For debugging you can launch the test_bitcoin executable with gdbor lldb and start debugging, just like you would with any other program:

gdb src/test/test_bitcoin

Segmentation faults

If you hit a segmentation fault during a test run, you can diagnose where the fault is happening by running gdb ./src/test/test_bitcoin and then using the bt command within gdb.

Another tool that can be used to resolve segmentation faults is valgrind.

If for whatever reason you want to produce a core dump file for this fault, you can do that as well. By default, the boost test runner will intercept system errors and not produce a core file. To bypass this, add --catch_system_errors=no to the test_bitcoin arguments and ensure that your ulimits are set properly (e.g. ulimit -c unlimited).

Running the tests and hitting a segmentation fault should now produce a file called core (on Linux platforms, the file name will likely depend on the contents of /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern).

You can then explore the core dump using

gdb src/test/test_bitcoin core

(gbd) bt  # produce a backtrace for where a segfault occurred