MarcoFalke 38b2a0a3f9
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23173: Add ChainstateManager::ProcessTransaction
0fdb619aaf1d62598263361a6082d182be1af792 [validation] Always call mempool.check() after processing a new transaction (John Newbery)
2c64270bbe523ef87e7225c351464e7c716f0b3e [refactor] Don't call AcceptToMemoryPool() from outside validation.cpp (John Newbery)
92a3aeecf6a82e9cbc9fda11022b0548efd24d05 [validation] Add CChainState::ProcessTransaction() (John Newbery)
36167faea92c97ddea7403280a5074073c8e5f90 [logging/documentation] Remove reference to AcceptToMemoryPool from error string (John Newbery)
4c24142b1ec121623f81ba644d77341bc1bd88dd [validation] Remove comment about AcceptToMemoryPool() (John Newbery)
5759fd12b8d5937e9187fa33489a95b1d8e6d1e5 [test] Don't set bypass_limits to true in txvalidation_tests.cpp (John Newbery)
497c9e29640858bb3beb20089c2d4f9e133c7e42 [test] Don't set bypass_limits to true in txvalidationcache_tests.cpp (John Newbery)

Pull request description:

  Similarly to how #18698 added `ProcessNewBlock()` and `ProcessNewBlockHeaders()` methods to the `ChainstateManager` class, this PR adds a new `ProcessTransaction()` method. Code outside validation no longer calls `AcceptToMemoryPool()` directly, but calls through the higher-level `ProcessTransaction()` method. Advantages:

  - The interface is simplified. Calling code no longer needs to know about the active chainstate or mempool object, since `AcceptToMemoryPool()` can only ever be called for the active chainstate, and that chainstate knows which mempool it's using. We can also remove the `bypass_limits` argument, since that can only be used internally in validation.
  - responsibility for calling `CTxMemPool::check()` is removed from the callers, and run automatically by `ChainstateManager` every time `ProcessTransaction()` is called.

ACKs for top commit:
  lsilva01:
    tACK 0fdb619 on Ubuntu 20.04
  theStack:
    Code-review ACK 0fdb619aaf1d62598263361a6082d182be1af792
  ryanofsky:
    Code review ACK 0fdb619aaf1d62598263361a6082d182be1af792. Only changes since last review: splitting & joining commits, adding more explanations to commit messages, tweaking MEMPOOL_ERROR string, fixing up argument name comments.

Tree-SHA512: 0b395c2e3ef242f0d41d47174b1646b0a73aeece38f1fe29349837e6fb832f4bf8d57e1a1eaed82a97c635cfd59015a7e07f824e0d7c00b2bee4144e80608172
2021-11-10 14:35:22 +01:00
..
2021-09-16 22:00:20 +00:00
2021-11-01 14:20:56 +01:00
2021-08-05 09:53:03 +02:00
2021-09-16 18:02:55 -04:00
2021-09-29 13:48:26 +02:00

Unit tests

The sources in this directory are unit test cases. Boost includes a unit testing framework, and since Bitcoin Core already uses Boost, it makes sense to simply use this framework rather than require developers to configure some other framework (we want as few impediments to creating unit tests as possible).

The build system is set up to compile an executable called test_bitcoin that runs all of the unit tests. The main source file for the test library is found in util/setup_common.cpp.

Compiling/running unit tests

Unit tests will be automatically compiled if dependencies were met in ./configure and tests weren't explicitly disabled.

After configuring, they can be run with make check.

To run the unit tests manually, launch src/test/test_bitcoin. To recompile after a test file was modified, run make and then run the test again. If you modify a non-test file, use make -C src/test to recompile only what's needed to run the unit tests.

To add more unit tests, add BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE functions to the existing .cpp files in the test/ directory or add new .cpp files that implement new BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE sections.

To run the GUI unit tests manually, launch src/qt/test/test_bitcoin-qt

To add more GUI unit tests, add them to the src/qt/test/ directory and the src/qt/test/test_main.cpp file.

Running individual tests

test_bitcoin has some built-in command-line arguments; for example, to run just the getarg_tests verbosely:

test_bitcoin --log_level=all --run_test=getarg_tests -- DEBUG_LOG_OUT

log_level controls the verbosity of the test framework, which logs when a test case is entered, for example. The DEBUG_LOG_OUT after the two dashes redirects the debug log, which would normally go to a file in the test datadir (BasicTestingSetup::m_path_root), to the standard terminal output.

... or to run just the doubledash test:

test_bitcoin --run_test=getarg_tests/doubledash

Run test_bitcoin --help for the full list.

Adding test cases

To add a new unit test file to our test suite you need to add the file to src/Makefile.test.include. The pattern is to create one test file for each class or source file for which you want to create unit tests. The file naming convention is <source_filename>_tests.cpp and such files should wrap their tests in a test suite called <source_filename>_tests. For an example of this pattern, see uint256_tests.cpp.

Logging and debugging in unit tests

make check will write to a log file foo_tests.cpp.log and display this file on failure. For running individual tests verbosely, refer to the section above.

To write to logs from unit tests you need to use specific message methods provided by Boost. The simplest is BOOST_TEST_MESSAGE.

For debugging you can launch the test_bitcoin executable with gdbor lldb and start debugging, just like you would with any other program:

gdb src/test/test_bitcoin

Segmentation faults

If you hit a segmentation fault during a test run, you can diagnose where the fault is happening by running gdb ./src/test/test_bitcoin and then using the bt command within gdb.

Another tool that can be used to resolve segmentation faults is valgrind.

If for whatever reason you want to produce a core dump file for this fault, you can do that as well. By default, the boost test runner will intercept system errors and not produce a core file. To bypass this, add --catch_system_errors=no to the test_bitcoin arguments and ensure that your ulimits are set properly (e.g. ulimit -c unlimited).

Running the tests and hitting a segmentation fault should now produce a file called core (on Linux platforms, the file name will likely depend on the contents of /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern).

You can then explore the core dump using

gdb src/test/test_bitcoin core

(gbd) bt  # produce a backtrace for where a segfault occurred