fanquake 4ee78450ff
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23826: test: Make AddrMan unit tests use public interface, extend coverage
ea4c9fd4ab9aaa2e8f2c2e38a75c9f05d0bfc866 test: Cover eviction by timeout in addrman_evictionworks (Martin Zumsande)
4f1bb467b556ec93c9b8f758783fda4d050da491 test: Add test for multiplicity in addrman new tables (Martin Zumsande)
e880bb7836dab2018049390884220177c6db9b92 test: Add test for updating addrman entries (Martin Zumsande)
f02eee8c8784dfc8db80a21ab6508f7c99298255 test: introduce utility function to retrieve an addrman (Martin Zumsande)
f0e5efb82493f7a14580335ce719d5be81c8713e test: Remove unused AddrManTest class (Martin Zumsande)
b696d7870b29232057600df5ddd8351888253b95 test: Remove tests for internal helper functions (Martin Zumsande)
0538520091bf2982a029a0298835400f5afbdc15 test: use AddrMan instead of AddrManTest where possible (Martin Zumsande)
1c65d427bbf61bb558cf7e18f7aff99b19f68508 test: Inline SimConnFail function (Martin Zumsande)
5b7aac34f2363822c3a1cfafda8ffc9528905058 test: delete unused GetBucketAndEntry function (Amiti Uttarwar)
2ba1e74e59a325ca6cb140757067dd5e0c7c249b test: Update addrman_serialization unit test to use AddrMan's interface (Amiti Uttarwar)
dad5f760211df314d650999e0a76edb0151b4fe1 addrman: Introduce a test-only function to lookup addresses (Amiti Uttarwar)

Pull request description:

  This PR (joint work with Amiti Uttarwar) changes the addrman unit tests such that they only use the public `AddrMan` interface:
  This has the advantage that the tests are less implementation-dependent, i.e. it would be possible to rewrite the internal addrman implementation (as drafted [here](https://github.com/sipa/bitcoin/tree/202106_multiindex_addrman) for using a multiindex) without having to adjust the tests.

  This includes the following steps:
  * Adding a test-only function `FindAddressEntry()` to the public addrman interface which returns info about an address in addrman (e.g. bucket, position, whethe the address is in new or tried).  Obviously we want to do this sparingly, but I think a single test-only function is ok (which could also be useful elsewhere, e.g. in fuzz tests).
  * Removal of the `AddrManTest` subclass which would reach into AddrMan's internals, using `AddrMan` instead
  * Removal of tests for internal helper functions that are not publicly exposed (these are still tested indirectly via the public functions calling them).
  * Additional tests for previously untested features such as multiplicity in the new tables, that can be tested with the help of `FindAddressEntry()`.

  All in all, this PR increases the unit test coverage of AddrMan by a bit.

ACKs for top commit:
  jnewbery:
    ACK ea4c9fd4ab9aaa2e8f2c2e38a75c9f05d0bfc866
  josibake:
    reACK ea4c9fd4ab

Tree-SHA512: c2d4ec8bdc62ffd6055ddcd37dea85ec08c76889e9e417e8d7c62a96cf68a8bcbe8c67bec3344d91fa7d3c499f6d9f810962da1dddd38e70966186b10b8ab447
2022-01-04 23:08:11 +08:00
..
2021-11-12 12:05:00 -05:00
2021-11-01 14:20:56 +01:00
2021-09-16 18:02:55 -04:00

Unit tests

The sources in this directory are unit test cases. Boost includes a unit testing framework, and since Bitcoin Core already uses Boost, it makes sense to simply use this framework rather than require developers to configure some other framework (we want as few impediments to creating unit tests as possible).

The build system is set up to compile an executable called test_bitcoin that runs all of the unit tests. The main source file for the test library is found in util/setup_common.cpp.

Compiling/running unit tests

Unit tests will be automatically compiled if dependencies were met in ./configure and tests weren't explicitly disabled.

After configuring, they can be run with make check.

To run the unit tests manually, launch src/test/test_bitcoin. To recompile after a test file was modified, run make and then run the test again. If you modify a non-test file, use make -C src/test to recompile only what's needed to run the unit tests.

To add more unit tests, add BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE functions to the existing .cpp files in the test/ directory or add new .cpp files that implement new BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE sections.

To run the GUI unit tests manually, launch src/qt/test/test_bitcoin-qt

To add more GUI unit tests, add them to the src/qt/test/ directory and the src/qt/test/test_main.cpp file.

Running individual tests

test_bitcoin has some built-in command-line arguments; for example, to run just the getarg_tests verbosely:

test_bitcoin --log_level=all --run_test=getarg_tests -- DEBUG_LOG_OUT

log_level controls the verbosity of the test framework, which logs when a test case is entered, for example. The DEBUG_LOG_OUT after the two dashes redirects the debug log, which would normally go to a file in the test datadir (BasicTestingSetup::m_path_root), to the standard terminal output.

... or to run just the doubledash test:

test_bitcoin --run_test=getarg_tests/doubledash

Run test_bitcoin --help for the full list.

Adding test cases

To add a new unit test file to our test suite you need to add the file to src/Makefile.test.include. The pattern is to create one test file for each class or source file for which you want to create unit tests. The file naming convention is <source_filename>_tests.cpp and such files should wrap their tests in a test suite called <source_filename>_tests. For an example of this pattern, see uint256_tests.cpp.

Logging and debugging in unit tests

make check will write to a log file foo_tests.cpp.log and display this file on failure. For running individual tests verbosely, refer to the section above.

To write to logs from unit tests you need to use specific message methods provided by Boost. The simplest is BOOST_TEST_MESSAGE.

For debugging you can launch the test_bitcoin executable with gdbor lldb and start debugging, just like you would with any other program:

gdb src/test/test_bitcoin

Segmentation faults

If you hit a segmentation fault during a test run, you can diagnose where the fault is happening by running gdb ./src/test/test_bitcoin and then using the bt command within gdb.

Another tool that can be used to resolve segmentation faults is valgrind.

If for whatever reason you want to produce a core dump file for this fault, you can do that as well. By default, the boost test runner will intercept system errors and not produce a core file. To bypass this, add --catch_system_errors=no to the test_bitcoin arguments and ensure that your ulimits are set properly (e.g. ulimit -c unlimited).

Running the tests and hitting a segmentation fault should now produce a file called core (on Linux platforms, the file name will likely depend on the contents of /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern).

You can then explore the core dump using

gdb src/test/test_bitcoin core

(gbd) bt  # produce a backtrace for where a segfault occurred