58914ab459c46c518c47c5082aec25ac0d03ab11 fuzz: assert min diff between FeeFrac and CFeeRate (Pieter Wuille)
0c6bcfd8f73bfd8524c01b302dc4a27665abf5c3 feefrac: support both rounding up and down for Evaluate (Pieter Wuille)
ecf956ec9d3badeb940f85588003aac4c6d2190b feefrac: add support for evaluating at given size (Pieter Wuille)
7963aecead968d126545d3730da5d9942c3f9518 feefrac: add helper functions for 96-bit division (Pieter Wuille)
800c0dea9af773b77b89233528efe265fe154db1 feefrac: rework comments around Mul/MulFallback (Pieter Wuille)
fcfe008db25ef14fdb4dc0e1620bd03c0065b840 feefrac fuzz: use arith_uint256 instead of ad-hoc multiply (Pieter Wuille)
46ff4220bff01944f436e1c405d038082b2c87af arith_uint256: modernize comparison operators (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
The `FeeFrac` type represents a fraction, intended to be used for sats/vbyte or sats/WU. This PR adds functionality to evaluate that feerate for a given size, in order to obtain the fee it corresponds with (rounding down, or rounding up).
The motivation here is being able to do accurate feerate evaluations in cluster mempool block building heuristics (where rounding down is needed), but in principle this makes it possible to use `FeeFrac` as a more accurate replacement for `CFeeRate` (where for feerate estimation rounding up is desirable). Because of this, both rounding modes are implemented.
Unit tests are included for known-correct values, plus a fuzz test that verifies the result using `arith_uint256`.
ACKs for top commit:
l0rinc:
ACK 58914ab459c46c518c47c5082aec25ac0d03ab11
ismaelsadeeq:
reACK 58914ab459c46c518c47c5082aec25ac0d03ab11
glozow:
light code review ACK 58914ab459c46c518c47c5082aec25ac0d03ab11
Tree-SHA512: 362b88454bf355cae1f12d6430b1bb9ab66824140e12b27db7c48385f1e8db936da7d0694fb5aad2a00eb9e5fe3083a3a2c0cc40b2a68e2d37e07b3481d4eeae
Bitcoin Core integration/staging tree
For an immediately usable, binary version of the Bitcoin Core software, see https://bitcoincore.org/en/download/.
What is Bitcoin Core?
Bitcoin Core connects to the Bitcoin peer-to-peer network to download and fully validate blocks and transactions. It also includes a wallet and graphical user interface, which can be optionally built.
Further information about Bitcoin Core is available in the doc folder.
License
Bitcoin Core is released under the terms of the MIT license. See COPYING for more information or see https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT.
Development Process
The master branch is regularly built (see doc/build-*.md for instructions) and tested, but it is not guaranteed to be
completely stable. Tags are created
regularly from release branches to indicate new official, stable release versions of Bitcoin Core.
The https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui repository is used exclusively for the development of the GUI. Its master branch is identical in all monotree repositories. Release branches and tags do not exist, so please do not fork that repository unless it is for development reasons.
The contribution workflow is described in CONTRIBUTING.md and useful hints for developers can be found in doc/developer-notes.md.
Testing
Testing and code review is the bottleneck for development; we get more pull requests than we can review and test on short notice. Please be patient and help out by testing other people's pull requests, and remember this is a security-critical project where any mistake might cost people lots of money.
Automated Testing
Developers are strongly encouraged to write unit tests for new code, and to
submit new unit tests for old code. Unit tests can be compiled and run
(assuming they weren't disabled during the generation of the build system) with: ctest. Further details on running
and extending unit tests can be found in /src/test/README.md.
There are also regression and integration tests, written
in Python.
These tests can be run (if the test dependencies are installed) with: build/test/functional/test_runner.py
(assuming build is your build directory).
The CI (Continuous Integration) systems make sure that every pull request is built for Windows, Linux, and macOS, and that unit/sanity tests are run automatically.
Manual Quality Assurance (QA) Testing
Changes should be tested by somebody other than the developer who wrote the code. This is especially important for large or high-risk changes. It is useful to add a test plan to the pull request description if testing the changes is not straightforward.
Translations
Changes to translations as well as new translations can be submitted to Bitcoin Core's Transifex page.
Translations are periodically pulled from Transifex and merged into the git repository. See the translation process for details on how this works.
Important: We do not accept translation changes as GitHub pull requests because the next pull from Transifex would automatically overwrite them again.