Ava Chow 33df4aebae
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#31551: [IBD] batch block reads/writes during AutoFile serialization
8d801e3efbf1e3b1f9a0060b777788f271cb21c9 optimization: bulk serialization writes in `WriteBlockUndo` and `WriteBlock` (Lőrinc)
520965e2939567e0e5b7bcf598f3891bf4a806c9 optimization: bulk serialization reads in `UndoRead`, `ReadBlock` (Lőrinc)
056cb3c0d2efb86447b7ff7788c206e2e7d72c12 refactor: clear up blockstorage/streams in preparation for optimization (Lőrinc)
67fcc64802385a6224bb3e9b2069272b9994bf9d log: unify error messages for (read/write)[undo]block (Lőrinc)
a4de16049222d0a0f5530f4e366254478a21ab44 scripted-diff: shorten BLOCK_SERIALIZATION_HEADER_SIZE constant (Lőrinc)
6640dd52c9fcb85d77f081780c02ee37b8089091 Narrow scope of undofile write to avoid possible resource management issue (Lőrinc)
3197155f91a48bdf760ad4242ff7c75f66e47c32 refactor: collect block read operations into try block (Lőrinc)
c77e3107b813ccb638480f100c5ab2a1d9043a6b refactor: rename leftover WriteBlockBench (Lőrinc)

Pull request description:

  This change is part of [[IBD] - Tracking PR for speeding up Initial Block Download](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32043)

  ### Summary
  We can serialize the blocks and undos to any `Stream` which implements the appropriate read/write methods.
  `AutoFile` is one of these, writing the results "directly" to disk (through the OS file cache). Batching these in memory first and reading/writing these to disk is measurably faster (likely because of fewer native fread calls or less locking, as [observed](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28226#issuecomment-1666842501) by Martinus in a similar change).

  ### Unlocking new optimization opportunities

  Buffered writes will also enable batched obfuscation calculations (implemented in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31144) - especially since currently we need to copy the write input's std::span to do the obfuscation on it, and batching enables doing the operations on the internal buffer directly.

  ### Measurements (micro benchmarks, full IBDs and reindexes)

  Microbenchmarks for `[Read|Write]BlockBench` show a ~**30%**/**168%** speedup with `macOS/Clang`, and ~**19%**/**24%** with `Linux/GCC` (the follow-up XOR batching improves these further):

  <details>
  <summary>macOS Sequoia - Clang 19.1.7</summary>

  > Before:

  |               ns/op |                op/s |    err% |     total | benchmark
  |--------------------:|--------------------:|--------:|----------:|:----------
  |        2,271,441.67 |              440.25 |    0.1% |     11.00 | `ReadBlockBench`
  |        5,149,564.31 |              194.19 |    0.8% |     10.95 | `WriteBlockBench`

  > After:

  |               ns/op |                op/s |    err% |     total | benchmark
  |--------------------:|--------------------:|--------:|----------:|:----------
  |        1,738,683.04 |              575.15 |    0.2% |     11.04 | `ReadBlockBench`
  |        3,052,658.88 |              327.58 |    1.0% |     10.91 | `WriteBlockBench`

  </details>

  <details>
  <summary>Ubuntu 24 - GNU 13.3.0</summary>

  > Before:

  |               ns/op |                op/s |    err% |          ins/op |          cyc/op |    IPC |         bra/op |   miss% |     total | benchmark
  |--------------------:|--------------------:|--------:|----------------:|----------------:|-------:|---------------:|--------:|----------:|:----------
  |        6,895,987.11 |              145.01 |    0.0% |   71,055,269.86 |   23,977,374.37 |  2.963 |   5,074,828.78 |    0.4% |     22.00 | `ReadBlockBench`
  |        5,152,973.58 |              194.06 |    2.2% |   19,350,886.41 |    8,784,539.75 |  2.203 |   3,079,335.21 |    0.4% |     23.18 | `WriteBlockBench`

  > After:

  |               ns/op |                op/s |    err% |          ins/op |          cyc/op |    IPC |         bra/op |   miss% |     total | benchmark
  |--------------------:|--------------------:|--------:|----------------:|----------------:|-------:|---------------:|--------:|----------:|:----------
  |        5,771,882.71 |              173.25 |    0.0% |   65,741,889.82 |   20,453,232.33 |  3.214 |   3,971,321.75 |    0.3% |     22.01 | `ReadBlockBench`
  |        4,145,681.13 |              241.21 |    4.0% |   15,337,596.85 |    5,732,186.47 |  2.676 |   2,239,662.64 |    0.1% |     23.94 | `WriteBlockBench`

  </details>

  2 full IBD runs against master (compiled with GCC where the gains seem more modest) for **888888** blocks (seeded from real nodes) indicates a ~**7%** total speedup.

  <details>
  <summary>Details</summary>

  ```bash
  COMMITS="d2b72b13699cf460ffbcb1028bcf5f3b07d3b73a 652b4e3de5c5e09fb812abe265f4a8946fa96b54"; \
  STOP_HEIGHT=888888; DBCACHE=1000; \
  C_COMPILER=gcc; CXX_COMPILER=g++; \
  BASE_DIR="/mnt/my_storage"; DATA_DIR="$BASE_DIR/BitcoinData"; LOG_DIR="$BASE_DIR/logs"; \
  (for c in $COMMITS; do git fetch origin $c -q && git log -1 --pretty=format:'%h %s' $c || exit 1; done) && \
  hyperfine \
    --sort 'command' \
    --runs 2 \
    --export-json "$BASE_DIR/ibd-${COMMITS// /-}-$STOP_HEIGHT-$DBCACHE-$C_COMPILER.json" \
    --parameter-list COMMIT ${COMMITS// /,} \
    --prepare "killall bitcoind; rm -rf $DATA_DIR/*; git checkout {COMMIT}; git clean -fxd; git reset --hard; \
      cmake -B build -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DENABLE_WALLET=OFF -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=$C_COMPILER -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=$CXX_COMPILER && \
      cmake --build build -j$(nproc) --target bitcoind && \
      ./build/bin/bitcoind -datadir=$DATA_DIR -stopatheight=1 -printtoconsole=0; sleep 100" \
    --cleanup "cp $DATA_DIR/debug.log $LOG_DIR/debug-{COMMIT}-$(date +%s).log" \
    "COMPILER=$C_COMPILER COMMIT=${COMMIT:0:10} ./build/bin/bitcoind -datadir=$DATA_DIR -stopatheight=$STOP_HEIGHT -dbcache=$DBCACHE -blocksonly -printtoconsole=0"
  d2b72b1369 refactor: rename leftover WriteBlockBench
  652b4e3de5 optimization: Bulk serialization writes in `WriteBlockUndo` and `WriteBlock`
  Benchmark 1: COMPILER=gcc ./build/bin/bitcoind -datadir=/mnt/my_storage/BitcoinData -stopatheight=888888 -dbcache=1000 -blocksonly -printtoconsole=0 (COMMIT = d2b72b13699cf460ffbcb1028bcf5f3b07d3b73a)
    Time (mean ± σ):     41528.104 s ± 354.003 s    [User: 44324.407 s, System: 3074.829 s]
    Range (min … max):   41277.786 s … 41778.421 s    2 runs

  Benchmark 2: COMPILER=gcc ./build/bin/bitcoind -datadir=/mnt/my_storage/BitcoinData -stopatheight=888888 -dbcache=1000 -blocksonly -printtoconsole=0 (COMMIT = 652b4e3de5c5e09fb812abe265f4a8946fa96b54)
    Time (mean ± σ):     38771.457 s ± 441.941 s    [User: 41930.651 s, System: 3222.664 s]
    Range (min … max):   38458.957 s … 39083.957 s    2 runs

  Relative speed comparison
          1.07 ±  0.02  COMPILER=gcc ./build/bin/bitcoind -datadir=/mnt/my_storage/BitcoinData -stopatheight=888888 -dbcache=1000 -blocksonly -printtoconsole=0 (COMMIT = d2b72b13699cf460ffbcb1028bcf5f3b07d3b73a)
          1.00          COMPILER=gcc ./build/bin/bitcoind -datadir=/mnt/my_storage/BitcoinData -stopatheight=888888 -dbcache=1000 -blocksonly -printtoconsole=0 (COMMIT = 652b4e3de5c5e09fb812abe265f4a8946fa96b54)
  ```

  </details>

ACKs for top commit:
  maflcko:
    re-ACK 8d801e3efbf1e3b1f9a0060b777788f271cb21c9 🐦
  achow101:
    ACK 8d801e3efbf1e3b1f9a0060b777788f271cb21c9
  ryanofsky:
    Code review ACK 8d801e3efbf1e3b1f9a0060b777788f271cb21c9. Most notable change is switching from BufferedReader to ReadRawBlock for block reads, which makes sense, and there are also various cleanups in blockstorage and test code.
  hodlinator:
    re-ACK 8d801e3efbf1e3b1f9a0060b777788f271cb21c9

Tree-SHA512: 24e1dee653b927b760c0ba3c69d1aba15fa5d9c4536ad11cfc2d70196ae16b9228ecc3056eef70923364257d72dc929882e73e69c6c426e28139d31299d08adc
2025-04-16 15:16:22 -07:00
..
2025-03-13 11:13:13 +00:00
2024-12-17 10:12:31 +07:00

Unit tests

The sources in this directory are unit test cases. Boost includes a unit testing framework, and since Bitcoin Core already uses Boost, it makes sense to simply use this framework rather than require developers to configure some other framework (we want as few impediments to creating unit tests as possible).

The build system is set up to compile an executable called test_bitcoin that runs all of the unit tests. The main source file for the test library is found in util/setup_common.cpp.

The examples in this document assume the build directory is named build. You'll need to adapt them if you named it differently.

Compiling/running unit tests

Unit tests will be automatically compiled if dependencies were met during the generation of the Bitcoin Core build system and tests weren't explicitly disabled.

The unit tests can be run with ctest --test-dir build, which includes unit tests from subtrees.

Run test_bitcoin --list_content for the full list of tests.

To run the unit tests manually, launch build/bin/test_bitcoin. To recompile after a test file was modified, run cmake --build build and then run the test again. If you modify a non-test file, use cmake --build build --target test_bitcoin to recompile only what's needed to run the unit tests.

To add more unit tests, add BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE functions to the existing .cpp files in the test/ directory or add new .cpp files that implement new BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE sections.

To run the GUI unit tests manually, launch build/bin/test_bitcoin-qt

To add more GUI unit tests, add them to the src/qt/test/ directory and the src/qt/test/test_main.cpp file.

Running individual tests

The test_bitcoin runner accepts command line arguments from the Boost framework. To see the list of arguments that may be passed, run:

test_bitcoin --help

For example, to run only the tests in the getarg_tests file, with full logging:

build/bin/test_bitcoin --log_level=all --run_test=getarg_tests

or

build/bin/test_bitcoin -l all -t getarg_tests

or to run only the doubledash test in getarg_tests

build/bin/test_bitcoin --run_test=getarg_tests/doubledash

The --log_level= (or -l) argument controls the verbosity of the test output.

The test_bitcoin runner also accepts some of the command line arguments accepted by bitcoind. Use -- to separate these sets of arguments:

build/bin/test_bitcoin --log_level=all --run_test=getarg_tests -- -printtoconsole=1

The -printtoconsole=1 after the two dashes sends debug logging, which normally goes only to debug.log within the data directory, to the standard terminal output as well.

Running test_bitcoin creates a temporary working (data) directory with a randomly generated pathname within test_common bitcoin/, which in turn is within the system's temporary directory (see temp_directory_path). This data directory looks like a simplified form of the standard bitcoind data directory. Its content will vary depending on the test, but it will always have a debug.log file, for example.

The location of the temporary data directory can be specified with the -testdatadir option. This can make debugging easier. The directory path used is the argument path appended with /test_common bitcoin/<test-name>/datadir. The directory path is created if necessary. Specifying this argument also causes the data directory not to be removed after the last test. This is useful for looking at what the test wrote to debug.log after it completes, for example. (The directory is removed at the start of the next test run, so no leftover state is used.)

$ build/bin/test_bitcoin --run_test=getarg_tests/doubledash -- -testdatadir=/somewhere/mydatadir
Test directory (will not be deleted): "/somewhere/mydatadir/test_common bitcoin/getarg_tests/doubledash/datadir"
Running 1 test case...

*** No errors detected
$ ls -l '/somewhere/mydatadir/test_common bitcoin/getarg_tests/doubledash/datadir'
total 8
drwxrwxr-x 2 admin admin 4096 Nov 27 22:45 blocks
-rw-rw-r-- 1 admin admin 1003 Nov 27 22:45 debug.log

If you run an entire test suite, such as --run_test=getarg_tests, or all the test suites (by not specifying --run_test), a separate directory will be created for each individual test.

Adding test cases

To add a new unit test file to our test suite, you need to add the file to either src/test/CMakeLists.txt or src/wallet/test/CMakeLists.txt for wallet-related tests. The pattern is to create one test file for each class or source file for which you want to create unit tests. The file naming convention is <source_filename>_tests.cpp and such files should wrap their tests in a test suite called <source_filename>_tests. For an example of this pattern, see uint256_tests.cpp.

Logging and debugging in unit tests

ctest --test-dir build will write to the log file build/Testing/Temporary/LastTest.log. You can additionally use the --output-on-failure option to display logs of the failed tests automatically on failure. For running individual tests verbosely, refer to the section above.

To write to logs from unit tests you need to use specific message methods provided by Boost. The simplest is BOOST_TEST_MESSAGE.

For debugging you can launch the test_bitcoin executable with gdb or lldb and start debugging, just like you would with any other program:

gdb build/bin/test_bitcoin

Segmentation faults

If you hit a segmentation fault during a test run, you can diagnose where the fault is happening by running gdb ./build/bin/test_bitcoin and then using the bt command within gdb.

Another tool that can be used to resolve segmentation faults is valgrind.

If for whatever reason you want to produce a core dump file for this fault, you can do that as well. By default, the boost test runner will intercept system errors and not produce a core file. To bypass this, add --catch_system_errors=no to the test_bitcoin arguments and ensure that your ulimits are set properly (e.g. ulimit -c unlimited).

Running the tests and hitting a segmentation fault should now produce a file called core (on Linux platforms, the file name will likely depend on the contents of /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern).

You can then explore the core dump using

gdb build/bin/test_bitcoin core

(gdb) bt  # produce a backtrace for where a segfault occurred