Ava Chow a52837b9e9
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#29575: net_processing: make any misbehavior trigger immediate discouragement
6eecba475efd025eb011400af58621ad5823994e net_processing: make MaybePunishNodeFor{Block,Tx} return void (Pieter Wuille)
ae60d485da33f238ed2186799da4e109d4edd3a1 net_processing: remove Misbehavior score and increments (Pieter Wuille)
6457c311977bba3585648e32e3bd5754028aa292 net_processing: make all Misbehaving increments = 100 (Pieter Wuille)
5120ab1478c200b18ee621a6ffa0362f4e991959 net_processing: drop 8 headers threshold for incoming BIP130 (Pieter Wuille)
944c54290d5c081dc433dae7e7941074a3a8b5a7 net_processing: drop Misbehavior for unconnecting headers (Pieter Wuille)
9f66ac7cf1931c4d7c36abbb000b7de306d83a4c net_processing: do not treat non-connecting headers as response (Pieter Wuille)

Pull request description:

  So far, discouragement of peers triggers when their misbehavior score exceeds 100 points. Most types of misbehavior increment the score by 100, triggering immediate discouragement, but some types do not. This PR makes all increments equal to either 100 (meaning any misbehavior will immediately cause disconnection and discouragement) or 0 (making the behavior effectively unconditionally allowed), and then removes the logic for score accumulation.

  This simplifies the code a bit, but also makes protocol expectations clearer: if a peer misbehaves, they get disconnected. There is no good reason why certain types of protocol violations should be permitted 4 times (howmuch=20) or 9 times (howmuch=10), while many others are never allowed. Furthermore, the distinction between these looks arbitrary.

  The specific types of misbehavior that are changed to 100 are:
  * Sending us a `block` which does not connect to our header tree (which necessarily must have been unsollicited). [used to be score 10]
  * Sending us a `headers` with a non-continuous headers sequence. [used to be score 20]
  * Sending us more than 1000 addresses in a single `addr` or `addrv2` message [used to be score 20]
  * Sending us more than 50000 invs in a single `inv` message [used to be score 20]
  * Sending us more than 2000 headers in a single `headers` message [used to be score 20]

  The specific types of misbehavior that are changed to 0 are:
  * Sending us 10 (*) separate BIP130 headers announcements that do not connect to our block tree [used to be score 20]
  * Sending us more than 8 headers in a single `headers` message (which thus does not get treated as a BIP130 announcement) that does not connect to our block tree. [used to be score 10]

  I believe that none of these behaviors are unavoidable, except for the one marked (*) which can in theory happen still due to interaction between BIP130 and variations in system clocks (the max 2 hour in the future rule). This one has been removed entirely. In order to remove the impact of the bug it was designed to deal with, without relying on misbehavior, a separate improvement is included that makes `getheaders`-tracking more accurate.

  In another unrelated improvement, this also gets rid of the 8 header limit heuristic to determine whether an incoming non-connecting `headers` is a potential BIP130 announcement, as this rule is no longer needed to prevent spurious Misbehavior. Instead, any non-connecting `headers` is now treated as a potential announcement.

ACKs for top commit:
  sr-gi:
    ACK [6eecba4](6eecba475e)
  achow101:
    ACK 6eecba475efd025eb011400af58621ad5823994e
  mzumsande:
    Code Review ACK 6eecba475efd025eb011400af58621ad5823994e
  glozow:
    light code review / concept ACK 6eecba475efd025eb011400af58621ad5823994e

Tree-SHA512: e11e8a652c4ec048d8961086110a3594feefbb821e13f45c14ef81016377be0db44b5311751ef635d6e026def1960aff33f644e78ece11cfb54f2b7daa96f946
2024-06-20 13:28:38 -04:00
..
2024-06-13 09:52:59 -04:00
2023-08-07 11:33:34 +02:00
2024-03-26 16:51:46 +00:00
2024-05-14 10:38:57 +01:00
2024-03-26 10:57:40 -03:00
2024-03-20 16:15:43 -04:00

Functional tests

Writing Functional Tests

Example test

The file test/functional/example_test.py is a heavily commented example of a test case that uses both the RPC and P2P interfaces. If you are writing your first test, copy that file and modify to fit your needs.

Coverage

Running test/functional/test_runner.py with the --coverage argument tracks which RPCs are called by the tests and prints a report of uncovered RPCs in the summary. This can be used (along with the --extended argument) to find out which RPCs we don't have test cases for.

Style guidelines

  • Where possible, try to adhere to PEP-8 guidelines
  • Use a python linter like flake8 before submitting PRs to catch common style nits (eg trailing whitespace, unused imports, etc)
  • The oldest supported Python version is specified in doc/dependencies.md. Consider using pyenv, which checks .python-version, to prevent accidentally introducing modern syntax from an unsupported Python version. The CI linter job also checks this, but possibly not in all cases.
  • See the python lint script that checks for violations that could lead to bugs and issues in the test code.
  • Use type hints in your code to improve code readability and to detect possible bugs earlier.
  • Avoid wildcard imports.
  • If more than one name from a module is needed, use lexicographically sorted multi-line imports in order to reduce the possibility of potential merge conflicts.
  • Use a module-level docstring to describe what the test is testing, and how it is testing it.
  • When subclassing the BitcoinTestFramework, place overrides for the set_test_params(), add_options() and setup_xxxx() methods at the top of the subclass, then locally-defined helper methods, then the run_test() method.
  • Use f'{x}' for string formatting in preference to '{}'.format(x) or '%s' % x.
  • Use platform.system() for detecting the running operating system and os.name to check whether it's a POSIX system (see also the skip_if_platform_not_{linux,posix} methods in the BitcoinTestFramework class, which can be used to skip a whole test depending on the platform).

Naming guidelines

  • Name the test <area>_test.py, where area can be one of the following:
    • feature for tests for full features that aren't wallet/mining/mempool, eg feature_rbf.py
    • interface for tests for other interfaces (REST, ZMQ, etc), eg interface_rest.py
    • mempool for tests for mempool behaviour, eg mempool_reorg.py
    • mining for tests for mining features, eg mining_prioritisetransaction.py
    • p2p for tests that explicitly test the p2p interface, eg p2p_disconnect_ban.py
    • rpc for tests for individual RPC methods or features, eg rpc_listtransactions.py
    • tool for tests for tools, eg tool_wallet.py
    • wallet for tests for wallet features, eg wallet_keypool.py
  • Use an underscore to separate words
    • exception: for tests for specific RPCs or command line options which don't include underscores, name the test after the exact RPC or argument name, eg rpc_decodescript.py, not rpc_decode_script.py
  • Don't use the redundant word test in the name, eg interface_zmq.py, not interface_zmq_test.py

General test-writing advice

  • Instead of inline comments or no test documentation at all, log the comments to the test log, e.g. self.log.info('Create enough transactions to fill a block'). Logs make the test code easier to read and the test logic easier to debug.
  • Set self.num_nodes to the minimum number of nodes necessary for the test. Having additional unrequired nodes adds to the execution time of the test as well as memory/CPU/disk requirements (which is important when running tests in parallel).
  • Avoid stop-starting the nodes multiple times during the test if possible. A stop-start takes several seconds, so doing it several times blows up the runtime of the test.
  • Set the self.setup_clean_chain variable in set_test_params() to True to initialize an empty blockchain and start from the Genesis block, rather than load a premined blockchain from cache with the default value of False. The cached data directories contain a 200-block pre-mined blockchain with the spendable mining rewards being split between four nodes. Each node has 25 mature block subsidies (25x50=1250 BTC) in its wallet. Using them is much more efficient than mining blocks in your test.
  • When calling RPCs with lots of arguments, consider using named keyword arguments instead of positional arguments to make the intent of the call clear to readers.
  • Many of the core test framework classes such as CBlock and CTransaction don't allow new attributes to be added to their objects at runtime like typical Python objects allow. This helps prevent unpredictable side effects from typographical errors or usage of the objects outside of their intended purpose.

RPC and P2P definitions

Test writers may find it helpful to refer to the definitions for the RPC and P2P messages. These can be found in the following source files:

  • /src/rpc/* for RPCs
  • /src/wallet/rpc* for wallet RPCs
  • ProcessMessage() in /src/net_processing.cpp for parsing P2P messages

Using the P2P interface

  • P2Ps can be used to test specific P2P protocol behavior. p2p.py contains test framework p2p objects and messages.py contains all the definitions for objects passed over the network (CBlock, CTransaction, etc, along with the network-level wrappers for them, msg_block, msg_tx, etc).

  • P2P tests have two threads. One thread handles all network communication with the bitcoind(s) being tested in a callback-based event loop; the other implements the test logic.

  • P2PConnection is the class used to connect to a bitcoind. P2PInterface contains the higher level logic for processing P2P payloads and connecting to the Bitcoin Core node application logic. For custom behaviour, subclass the P2PInterface object and override the callback methods.

P2PConnections can be used as such:

p2p_conn = node.add_p2p_connection(P2PInterface())
p2p_conn.send_and_ping(msg)

They can also be referenced by indexing into a TestNode's p2ps list, which contains the list of test framework p2p objects connected to itself (it does not include any TestNodes):

node.p2ps[0].sync_with_ping()

More examples can be found in p2p_unrequested_blocks.py, p2p_compactblocks.py.

Prototyping tests

The TestShell class exposes the BitcoinTestFramework functionality to interactive Python3 environments and can be used to prototype tests. This may be especially useful in a REPL environment with session logging utilities, such as IPython. The logs of such interactive sessions can later be adapted into permanent test cases.

Test framework modules

The following are useful modules for test developers. They are located in test/functional/test_framework/.

authproxy.py

Taken from the python-bitcoinrpc repository.

test_framework.py

Base class for functional tests.

util.py

Generally useful functions.

p2p.py

Test objects for interacting with a bitcoind node over the p2p interface.

script.py

Utilities for manipulating transaction scripts (originally from python-bitcoinlib)

key.py

Test-only secp256k1 elliptic curve implementation

blocktools.py

Helper functions for creating blocks and transactions.

Benchmarking with perf

An easy way to profile node performance during functional tests is provided for Linux platforms using perf.

Perf will sample the running node and will generate profile data in the node's datadir. The profile data can then be presented using perf report or a graphical tool like hotspot.

There are two ways of invoking perf: one is to use the --perf flag when running tests, which will profile each node during the entire test run: perf begins to profile when the node starts and ends when it shuts down. The other way is the use the profile_with_perf context manager, e.g.

with node.profile_with_perf("send-big-msgs"):
    # Perform activity on the node you're interested in profiling, e.g.:
    for _ in range(10000):
        node.p2ps[0].send_message(some_large_message)

To see useful textual output, run

perf report -i /path/to/datadir/send-big-msgs.perf.data.xxxx --stdio | c++filt | less

See also: