mirror of
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git
synced 2026-02-01 11:11:22 +00:00
ffff4a293ad878494e12f8f00108cc99ee2b713e bench: Update span-serialize comment (MarcoFalke) fa4d6ec97bcb1790a7cd4363a13fda7c80c3dd90 refactor: Avoid false-positive gcc warning (MarcoFalke) fa942332b40c97375af0722f32f7575bca3af819 scripted-diff: Bump copyright headers after std::span changes (MarcoFalke) fa0c6b7179c062b7ca92d120455ce02a9f4e9e19 refactor: Remove unused Span alias (MarcoFalke) fade0b5e5e6e80e3da1ab6448b6212244bafa5d3 scripted-diff: Use std::span over Span (MarcoFalke) fadccc26c03db00a2be3f703aa7e5eec4312bd2e refactor: Make Span an alias of std::span (MarcoFalke) fa27e36717ec18d64b7ff7bba71b8f0c202ba31d test: Fix broken span_tests (MarcoFalke) fadf02ef8bf96ad5b3b8e34fd425b31b555f4371 refactor: Return std::span from MakeUCharSpan (MarcoFalke) fa720b94be17fa9e7c91188710e6a04939ceab11 refactor: Return std::span from MakeByteSpan (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: `Span` has some issues: * It does not support fixed-size spans, which are available through `std::span`. * It is confusing to have it available and in use at the same time with `std::span`. * It does not obey the standard library iterator build hardening flags. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/31272 for a discussion. For example, this allows to catch issues like the one fixed in commit fabeca3458b38a3d8930cb0cbc866388c3f120f1. Both types are type-safe and can even implicitly convert into each other in most contexts. However, exclusively using `std::span` seems less confusing, so do it here with a scripted-diff. ACKs for top commit: l0rinc: reACK ffff4a293ad878494e12f8f00108cc99ee2b713e theuni: ACK ffff4a293ad878494e12f8f00108cc99ee2b713e. Tree-SHA512: 9cc2f1f43551e2c07cc09f38b1f27d11e57e9e9bc0c6138c8fddd0cef54b91acd8b14711205ff949be874294a121910d0aceffe0e8914c4cff07f1e0e87ad5b8