merge-script 9df4f9d100
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#34472: bench: add script verification benchmark for P2TR key path spends
d339884f1dfac3749c6214ae896b4354cf9ee28e bench: add script verification benchmark for P2TR key path spends (Sebastian Falbesoner)
dd93362a1d874eb761ed7026956a490b5ed0472b bench: simplify script verification benchmark, generalize signing (Sebastian Falbesoner)

Pull request description:

  We currently benchmark Schnorr signature verification only in the context of block validation ([`ConectBlock*`](8bb77f348e/src/bench/connectblock.cpp (L107)) benchmarks), but not individually for single inputs [1]. This PR adds a script verification benchmark for P2TR key path spends accordingly, by generalizing the already existing one for P2WPKH spends.

  This should make it easier to quantify potential performance improvements like e.g. https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/pull/1777, which allows to plug in our HW-optimized SHA256 functions to be used in libsecp256k1 (see the linked example commit f68bef06d9). IIRC from last CoreDev, the main speedup from this is expected for ECDSA signing though (as this involves quite a lot of hashing), but it still makes sense to have verification benchmarks available for both signature types as well.

  (An alternative way could be to add benchmarks for the signing/verifying member functions `CKey::Sign{,Schnorr}`, `CPubKey::Verify` and `XOnlyPubKey::VerifySchnorr` directly, if we prefer that.)

  [1] this claim can be practically verified by putting an `assert(false);` into `XOnlyPubKey::VerifySchnorr`: the three benchmarks crashing are `ConnectBlockAllSchnorr`, `ConnectBlockMixedEcdsaSchnorr` and `SignTransactionSchnorr` (as signing includes verification)

ACKs for top commit:
  furszy:
    ACK d339884f1dfac3749c6214ae896b4354cf9ee28e
  sedited:
    Re-ACK d339884f1dfac3749c6214ae896b4354cf9ee28e
  w0xlt:
    ACK d339884f1dfac3749c6214ae896b4354cf9ee28e

Tree-SHA512: efd20444984bdf1dab4d3d876fdbe2a3a838d7cebc0e31e26683009b81afe4dab8611e2c28c87e46fe8b7e305895c93e461b7934a5aaf293f72b19488b9cec60
2026-03-11 10:11:02 +01:00
2026-02-06 13:40:59 +00:00
2023-06-01 23:35:10 +05:30
2026-03-06 13:11:02 -08:00
2025-12-29 17:50:43 +00:00
2025-06-19 11:22:14 +01:00

Bitcoin Core integration/staging tree

https://bitcoincore.org

For an immediately usable, binary version of the Bitcoin Core software, see https://bitcoincore.org/en/download/.

What is Bitcoin Core?

Bitcoin Core connects to the Bitcoin peer-to-peer network to download and fully validate blocks and transactions. It also includes a wallet and graphical user interface, which can be optionally built.

Further information about Bitcoin Core is available in the doc folder.

License

Bitcoin Core is released under the terms of the MIT license. See COPYING for more information or see https://opensource.org/license/MIT.

Development Process

The master branch is regularly built (see doc/build-*.md for instructions) and tested, but it is not guaranteed to be completely stable. Tags are created regularly from release branches to indicate new official, stable release versions of Bitcoin Core.

The https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui repository is used exclusively for the development of the GUI. Its master branch is identical in all monotree repositories. Release branches and tags do not exist, so please do not fork that repository unless it is for development reasons.

The contribution workflow is described in CONTRIBUTING.md and useful hints for developers can be found in doc/developer-notes.md.

Testing

Testing and code review is the bottleneck for development; we get more pull requests than we can review and test on short notice. Please be patient and help out by testing other people's pull requests, and remember this is a security-critical project where any mistake might cost people lots of money.

Automated Testing

Developers are strongly encouraged to write unit tests for new code, and to submit new unit tests for old code. Unit tests can be compiled and run (assuming they weren't disabled during the generation of the build system) with: ctest. Further details on running and extending unit tests can be found in /src/test/README.md.

There are also regression and integration tests, written in Python. These tests can be run (if the test dependencies are installed) with: build/test/functional/test_runner.py (assuming build is your build directory).

The CI (Continuous Integration) systems make sure that every pull request is tested on Windows, Linux, and macOS. The CI must pass on all commits before merge to avoid unrelated CI failures on new pull requests.

Manual Quality Assurance (QA) Testing

Changes should be tested by somebody other than the developer who wrote the code. This is especially important for large or high-risk changes. It is useful to add a test plan to the pull request description if testing the changes is not straightforward.

Translations

Changes to translations as well as new translations can be submitted to Bitcoin Core's Transifex page.

Translations are periodically pulled from Transifex and merged into the git repository. See the translation process for details on how this works.

Important: We do not accept translation changes as GitHub pull requests because the next pull from Transifex would automatically overwrite them again.

Description
Bitcoin Core integration/staging tree
Readme 2.5 GiB
Languages
C++ 64.5%
Python 18.9%
C 12.9%
CMake 1.2%
Shell 0.8%
Other 1.6%