db2d39f642979f929261e5f1cd67f0c2f2ca045f fuzz: add subtest for re-downloading a previously pruned block (Eugene Siegel)
45f5b2dac330906368352a1c585183f0d75d779d fuzz: Add fuzzer for block index (Martin Zumsande)
c011e3aa542631a8857039df796ebf13a653e8a6 test: Wrap validation functions with TestChainstateManager (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
This adds a fuzz target for the block index and various events in validation that interact with it.
It can create arbitrary tree-like structure of block indexes, simulating (so far) the following events:
- Adding a header
- Receiving the full block (may be valid or not)
- `ActivateBestChain()` - Reorging the chain to a new chain tip (possibly encountering invalid blocks on the way)
- Pruning a block in the best chain
- Receiving a previously pruned block again (`getblockfrompeer`)
It might be interesting / possible to extend this to more events, such as dealing with more than one chainstate (assumeutxo).
The test skips all actual validation of header/ block / transaction data by just simulating the outcome, and also doesn't interact with the data directory.
The main goal is to ensure the integrity of the block index tree in all fuzzed constellations, by calling `CheckBlockIndex()` at the end of each iteration.
Compared to #29158 this approach has a more limited scope (by skipping all actual validation), but it is fast - it doesn't do a full init sequence on each iteration, but "cleans up" after itself by resetting the global validation state after each iteration.
ACKs for top commit:
Crypt-iQ:
reACK db2d39f642
maflcko:
review ACK db2d39f642979f929261e5f1cd67f0c2f2ca045f 🍶
sedited:
Re-ACK db2d39f642979f929261e5f1cd67f0c2f2ca045f
Tree-SHA512: 76cd5f8f4d7d7258620b46d7438bad4508c3bdc98825b48b60f694b5a9838e2b2cf4967c0ead181f86f66f4939ddfe552471851b9d18f84f584c03dd7e09fc43
516ae5ede4