merge-script 289d60f5ab
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#34161: refactor: avoid possible UB from std::distance for nullptr args
477c5504e05f9031449cdbf62bf329eac427cb0c  coins: replace `std::distance` with unambiguous pointer subtraction (Lőrinc)

Pull request description:

  ### Problem

  Calling `std::distance(nullptr, nullptr)` has ambiguous status in the C++ standard [iterator.requirements.general](https://eel.is/c++draft/iterator.requirements.general#7):
  > Iterators can also have singular values that are not associated with any sequence. Results of most expressions are undefined for singular values.

  It seems to work correctly in every implementation we use, but [LWG 1213](https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue1213) ("Meaning of valid and singular iterator underspecified") has been Open since 2009, acknowledging that the standard's wording on this topic is unclear.

  <details>
  <summary>Details</summary>

  The [iterator.requirements.general](https://eel.is/c++draft/iterator.requirements.general#7) states:
  > Iterators can also have singular values that are not associated with any sequence. Results of most expressions are undefined for singular values.

  And [LWG 208](https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue208)'s rationale explicitly confirms:
  > Null pointers are singular.

  Therefore they cannot form a valid range required by [std::distance](https://eel.is/c++draft/iterator.operations#4):
  > Preconditions: last is reachable from first, or InputIterator meets the Cpp17RandomAccessIterator requirements and first is reachable from last.

  </details>

  ### Fix

  A previous version of this PR checked both values for `nullptr`, the current one uses unambiguously well-defined pointer subtraction instead, which is per [expr.add](https://eel.is/c++draft/expr.add#5):
  > If P and Q both evaluate to null pointer values, the value is 0.

  This applies on the first call before any memory is allocated, when both pointers are `nullptr`.
  Using `operator-` directly is simpler and avoids the ambiguity entirely.

ACKs for top commit:
  maflcko:
    review ACK 477c5504e05f9031449cdbf62bf329eac427cb0c 🍶
  optout21:
    ACK 477c5504e05f9031449cdbf62bf329eac427cb0c
  sedited:
    ACK 477c5504e05f9031449cdbf62bf329eac427cb0c

Tree-SHA512: 5edfb19ab4820e2003928f60f20d4a5893bcd3c316afdfe91c9c06e9b465352769b2cddb0d0e2419ea083a906d35f4aada74149e81f4ea0315f8173ac538789f
2026-01-28 11:41:55 +01:00
2025-08-07 11:48:29 +01:00
2023-06-01 23:35:10 +05:30
2025-12-29 17:50:43 +00:00
2025-06-19 11:22:14 +01:00

Bitcoin Core integration/staging tree

https://bitcoincore.org

For an immediately usable, binary version of the Bitcoin Core software, see https://bitcoincore.org/en/download/.

What is Bitcoin Core?

Bitcoin Core connects to the Bitcoin peer-to-peer network to download and fully validate blocks and transactions. It also includes a wallet and graphical user interface, which can be optionally built.

Further information about Bitcoin Core is available in the doc folder.

License

Bitcoin Core is released under the terms of the MIT license. See COPYING for more information or see https://opensource.org/license/MIT.

Development Process

The master branch is regularly built (see doc/build-*.md for instructions) and tested, but it is not guaranteed to be completely stable. Tags are created regularly from release branches to indicate new official, stable release versions of Bitcoin Core.

The https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui repository is used exclusively for the development of the GUI. Its master branch is identical in all monotree repositories. Release branches and tags do not exist, so please do not fork that repository unless it is for development reasons.

The contribution workflow is described in CONTRIBUTING.md and useful hints for developers can be found in doc/developer-notes.md.

Testing

Testing and code review is the bottleneck for development; we get more pull requests than we can review and test on short notice. Please be patient and help out by testing other people's pull requests, and remember this is a security-critical project where any mistake might cost people lots of money.

Automated Testing

Developers are strongly encouraged to write unit tests for new code, and to submit new unit tests for old code. Unit tests can be compiled and run (assuming they weren't disabled during the generation of the build system) with: ctest. Further details on running and extending unit tests can be found in /src/test/README.md.

There are also regression and integration tests, written in Python. These tests can be run (if the test dependencies are installed) with: build/test/functional/test_runner.py (assuming build is your build directory).

The CI (Continuous Integration) systems make sure that every pull request is tested on Windows, Linux, and macOS. The CI must pass on all commits before merge to avoid unrelated CI failures on new pull requests.

Manual Quality Assurance (QA) Testing

Changes should be tested by somebody other than the developer who wrote the code. This is especially important for large or high-risk changes. It is useful to add a test plan to the pull request description if testing the changes is not straightforward.

Translations

Changes to translations as well as new translations can be submitted to Bitcoin Core's Transifex page.

Translations are periodically pulled from Transifex and merged into the git repository. See the translation process for details on how this works.

Important: We do not accept translation changes as GitHub pull requests because the next pull from Transifex would automatically overwrite them again.

Description
Bitcoin Core integration/staging tree
Readme 2.3 GiB
Languages
C++ 65%
Python 19%
C 12.2%
CMake 1.3%
Shell 0.8%
Other 1.6%