Ava Chow 19b1e177d6
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#32155: miner: timelock the coinbase to the mined block's height
a58cb3b1c12c8cb75a87375c50f94c4605bb805d qa: sanity check mined block have their coinbase timelocked to height (Antoine Poinsot)
8f2078af6a55448c003b3f7f3021955fbb351caa miner: timelock coinbase transactions (Antoine Poinsot)
788aeebf343526760fa8f3ed969ac3713212a5b6 qa: use prev height as nLockTime for coinbase txs created in unit tests (Antoine Poinsot)
c76dbe9b8b6f03b761a0ef97e1b8cd133b934714 qa: timelock coinbase transactions created in fuzz targets (Antoine Poinsot)
9c94069d8b6cf67a24eb03c51230a4f2b2bf2d64 contrib: timelock coinbase transactions in signet miner (Antoine Poinsot)
a5f52cfcc400ad0adb41a78c65b8abb971e0d622 qa: timelock coinbase transactions created in functional tests (Antoine Poinsot)

Pull request description:

  The Consensus Cleanup soft fork proposal includes enforcing that coinbase transactions set their
  nLockTime field to the block height minus 1, as well as their nSequence such as to not disable the
  timelock. If such a fork were to be activated by Bitcoin users, miners need to be ready to produce
  compliant blocks at the risk of losing substantial amounts mining would-be invalid blocks. As miners
  are unfamously slow to upgrade, it's good to make this change as early as possible.

  Although Bitcoin Core's GBT implementation does not provide the `coinbasetxn` field, and mining
  pool software crafts the coinbase on its own, updating the Bitcoin Core mining code is a first step
  toward convincing pools to update their (often closed source) code. A possible followup is also to
  introduce new fields to GBT. In addition, this first step also makes it possible to test future
  Consensus Cleanup changes.

  The commit making the change also updates a bunch of seemingly-unrelated tests. This is because those tests were asserting error messages based on the txid of transactions involved, and changing the coinbase transaction structure necessarily changes the txid of all tests' transactions.

ACKs for top commit:
  Sjors:
    Code review ACK a58cb3b1c12c8cb75a87375c50f94c4605bb805d
  achow101:
    ACK a58cb3b1c12c8cb75a87375c50f94c4605bb805d
  TheCharlatan:
    Re-ACK a58cb3b1c12c8cb75a87375c50f94c4605bb805d

Tree-SHA512: a2aae009a187eb760d34435f518a895ee76c6b02a667eb030ddf6bd584da6e8eae2737d974dbf81a928d60c07bcb4820f055adc067e18d8819640db0240bb513
2025-05-09 15:09:27 -07:00
2025-05-06 12:21:32 -07:00
2025-02-06 09:38:49 +00:00
2025-05-06 12:21:32 -07:00
2025-05-09 15:06:50 +02:00
2023-06-01 23:35:10 +05:30
2025-01-06 12:23:11 +00:00
2025-05-09 14:58:38 +02:00

Bitcoin Core integration/staging tree

https://bitcoincore.org

For an immediately usable, binary version of the Bitcoin Core software, see https://bitcoincore.org/en/download/.

What is Bitcoin Core?

Bitcoin Core connects to the Bitcoin peer-to-peer network to download and fully validate blocks and transactions. It also includes a wallet and graphical user interface, which can be optionally built.

Further information about Bitcoin Core is available in the doc folder.

License

Bitcoin Core is released under the terms of the MIT license. See COPYING for more information or see https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT.

Development Process

The master branch is regularly built (see doc/build-*.md for instructions) and tested, but it is not guaranteed to be completely stable. Tags are created regularly from release branches to indicate new official, stable release versions of Bitcoin Core.

The https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui repository is used exclusively for the development of the GUI. Its master branch is identical in all monotree repositories. Release branches and tags do not exist, so please do not fork that repository unless it is for development reasons.

The contribution workflow is described in CONTRIBUTING.md and useful hints for developers can be found in doc/developer-notes.md.

Testing

Testing and code review is the bottleneck for development; we get more pull requests than we can review and test on short notice. Please be patient and help out by testing other people's pull requests, and remember this is a security-critical project where any mistake might cost people lots of money.

Automated Testing

Developers are strongly encouraged to write unit tests for new code, and to submit new unit tests for old code. Unit tests can be compiled and run (assuming they weren't disabled during the generation of the build system) with: ctest. Further details on running and extending unit tests can be found in /src/test/README.md.

There are also regression and integration tests, written in Python. These tests can be run (if the test dependencies are installed) with: build/test/functional/test_runner.py (assuming build is your build directory).

The CI (Continuous Integration) systems make sure that every pull request is built for Windows, Linux, and macOS, and that unit/sanity tests are run automatically.

Manual Quality Assurance (QA) Testing

Changes should be tested by somebody other than the developer who wrote the code. This is especially important for large or high-risk changes. It is useful to add a test plan to the pull request description if testing the changes is not straightforward.

Translations

Changes to translations as well as new translations can be submitted to Bitcoin Core's Transifex page.

Translations are periodically pulled from Transifex and merged into the git repository. See the translation process for details on how this works.

Important: We do not accept translation changes as GitHub pull requests because the next pull from Transifex would automatically overwrite them again.

Description
Bitcoin Core integration/staging tree
Readme 2.3 GiB
Languages
C++ 65%
Python 19%
C 12.2%
CMake 1.3%
Shell 0.8%
Other 1.6%