41f891da508114f1fd4df30b4068073ec30abc2a tests: Skip SQLite fsyncs while testing (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Since we want tests to run quickly, and since tests do a lot more db operations than expected we expect to see in actual usage, we disable sqlite's syncing behavior to make db operations run much faster. This syncing behavior is necessary for normal operation as it helps guarantee that data won't become lost or corrupted, but in tests, we don't care about that.
Fixes#21628
ACKs for top commit:
vasild:
ACK 41f891da508114f1fd4df30b4068073ec30abc2a
Tree-SHA512: f36f969a182c622691ae5113573a3250e8d367437e83a1a9d3d2b55dd3a9cdf3c6474169a7bd271007bb9ce47f585aa7a6aeae6eebbaeb02d79409b02f47fd8b
Rather than 3 different messages that are confusing / leak
implementation details, use a single message, that is similar to other
wallet related messages. i.e:
"Compiled without sqlite support (required for descriptor wallets)".
Since we want tests to run quickly, and since tests do a lot more db
operations than expected we expect to see in actual usage, we disable
sqlite's syncing behavior to make db operations run much faster. This
syncing behavior is necessary for normal operation as it helps guarantee
that data won't become lost or corrupted, but in tests, we don't care
about that.
This commit moves the ExternalSigner class and RPC methods out of the wallet module.
The enumeratesigners RPC can be used without a wallet since #21417.
With additional modifications external signers could be used without a wallet in general, e.g. via signrawtransaction.
The signerdisplayaddress RPC is ranamed to walletdisplayaddress because it requires wallet context.
A future displayaddress RPC call without wallet context could take a descriptor argument.
This commit fixes a rpc_help.py failure when configured with --disable-wallet.
937fd4a66f048780bffc5e714d0c800de987ce93 Fix wrong wallet RPC context set after #21366 (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This bug doesn't have any effects currently because it only affects
external signer RPCs which aren't currently using the wallet context,
but it does cause an appveyor failure in a upcoming PR:
https://ci.appveyor.com/project/DrahtBot/bitcoin/builds/38512882
This bug is subtle and could have been avoided if JSONRPCRequest didn't
have constructors that were so loose with type checking. Suggested
change
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21366#issuecomment-792044351
eliminates these and would be a good followup for a future PR.
This PR just implements the simplest possible fix.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
Code-review ACK 937fd4a66f048780bffc5e714d0c800de987ce93
meshcollider:
Code review ACK 937fd4a66f048780bffc5e714d0c800de987ce93
Tree-SHA512: 53e6265ed6c7abb47d2b3e77d1604edfeb993c3a2440f0c19679cfeb23516965e6707ff486196a0acfbeff21c79a9a08b5cd33bae9a232d33d0134bca1bd0ff3
a4e970adb6de8425025ae3f62fb89d9e27a8ab1f build: enable -Wdocumentation if suppressing external warnings (fanquake)
3b0078f958c46e94b468c829522ba965f5549f11 doc: fixup -Wdocumentation issues (fanquake)
c6edcf1c710e4aaf1cafdbf8e86fe209b57bdeb8 build: suppress libevent warnings if supressing external warnings (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Enable `-Wdocumentation` by taking advantage of our `--enable-suppress-external-warnings` flag. Most of the CIs are using this flag now, so any regressions should be caught.
This also required modifying libevents flags when suppressing warnings, as depending on the version being built against, that could generate a large number of warnings. i.e:
```bash
In file included from httpserver.cpp:34:
In file included from ./support/events.h:12:
/usr/local/Cellar/libevent/2.1.12/include/event2/http.h:464:11: warning: parameter 'req' not found in the function declaration [-Wdocumentation]
@param req a request object
^~~
/usr/local/Cellar/libevent/2.1.12/include/event2/http.h:465:11: warning: parameter 'databuf' not found in the function declaration [-Wdocumentation]
@param databuf the data chunk to send as part of the reply.
^~~~~~~
/usr/local/Cellar/libevent/2.1.12/include/event2/http.h:467:11: warning: parameter 'call' not found in the function declaration [-Wdocumentation]
@param call back's argument.
^~~~
/usr/local/Cellar/libevent/2.1.12/include/event2/http.h:939:4: warning: declaration is marked with '@deprecated' command but does not have a deprecation attribute [-Wdocumentation-deprecated-sync]
@deprecated This function is deprecated; you probably want to use
~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/local/Cellar/libevent/2.1.12/include/event2/http.h:946:1: note: add a deprecation attribute to the declaration to silence this warning
char *evhttp_decode_uri(const char *uri);
^
__AVAILABILITY_INTERNAL_DEPRECATED
/usr/local/Cellar/libevent/2.1.12/include/event2/http.h:979:5: warning: declaration is marked with '@deprecated' command but does not have a deprecation attribute [-Wdocumentation-deprecated-sync]
@deprecated This function is deprecated as of Libevent 2.0.9. Use
~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/local/Cellar/libevent/2.1.12/include/event2/http.h:987:1: note: add a deprecation attribute to the declaration to silence this warning
int evhttp_parse_query(const char *uri, struct evkeyvalq *headers);
^
__AVAILABILITY_INTERNAL_DEPRECATED
/usr/local/Cellar/libevent/2.1.12/include/event2/http.h:1002:11: warning: parameter 'query_parse' not found in the function declaration [-Wdocumentation]
@param query_parse the query portion of the URI
^~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/local/Cellar/libevent/2.1.12/include/event2/http.h:1002:11: note: did you mean 'uri'?
@param query_parse the query portion of the URI
^~~~~~~~~~~
uri
69 warnings generated.
```
Note that a lot of these have already been fixed upstream.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Concept and code review ACK a4e970adb6de8425025ae3f62fb89d9e27a8ab1f
practicalswift:
cr ACK a4e970adb6de8425025ae3f62fb89d9e27a8ab1f: automatic compiler feedback comes sooner and is more reliable than manual reviewer feedback
jonatack:
Light ACK a4e970adb6de8425025ae3f62fb89d9e27a8ab1f skimmed the changes, clang 11 build is clean with the change, verified -Wdocumentation build warnings with this change when a doc fix was reverted
Tree-SHA512: 57a1e30cffcc8bcceee72d85f58ebe29eae525861c70acb237541bd480c51ede89875c033042c0af376fdbb49fb7f588ef9282a47c6e78f9d4501c41f1b21eb6
ea19cc844e780b29825b26aee321204be981a3ae wallet: refactor: dedup sqlite statement deletions (Sebastian Falbesoner)
9a3670930eaf6b495f81ef9c5f6e68883a3a2750 wallet: refactor: dedup sqlite statement preparations (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This refactoring PR deduplicates repeated SQLite statement preparation calls (`sqlite3_prepare_v2(...)`) / deletions (`sqlite3_finalize(...)`) and its surrounding logic by putting each prepared statement and its corresponding text representation into a ~std::map~ ~`std::array`~ `std::vector`. This should be more readable and less error-prone, e.g. in case an additional statement needs to be added in the future or the error handling has to be adapted.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK ea19cc844e780b29825b26aee321204be981a3ae
meshcollider:
utACK ea19cc844e780b29825b26aee321204be981a3ae
Tree-SHA512: ced89869b2147e088e7a4cda2acbbdd4a806f66dbc2d6999953d0d702c0655aa53c0eb699cc7e5e3732f2d24206d577a9d9e1b5de7f439100dead2696ade1092
fa5eabe72117f6e3704858e8d5b2c57a120258ed refactor: Remove negative lock annotations from globals (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
They only make sense for mutexes that are private members. Until cs_main is a private member the negative annotations should be replaced by excluded annotations, which are optional.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK fa5eabe72117f6e3704858e8d5b2c57a120258ed
ajtowns:
ACK fa5eabe72117f6e3704858e8d5b2c57a120258ed
hebasto:
ACK fa5eabe72117f6e3704858e8d5b2c57a120258ed
vasild:
ACK fa5eabe72117f6e3704858e8d5b2c57a120258ed
Tree-SHA512: 06f8a200304f81533010efcc42d9f59b8c4d0ae355920c0a28efb6fa161a3e3e68f2dfffb0c009afd9c2501e6a293c6e5a419a64d718f1f4e79668ab2ab1fcdc
This bug doesn't have any effects currently because it only affects
external signer RPCs which aren't currently using the wallet context,
but it does cause an appveyor failure in a upcoming PR:
https://ci.appveyor.com/project/DrahtBot/bitcoin/builds/38512882
This bug is subtle and could have been avoided if JSONRPCRequest didn't
have constructors that were so loose with type checking. Suggested
change
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21366#issuecomment-792044351
eliminates these and would be a good followup for a future PR.
2e5f7def22e1b212fbd69e9147145d9d1f408aaf wallet, rpc: update listdescriptors response format (Ivan Metlushko)
Pull request description:
Update `listdescriptors` response format according to [RPC interface guidelines](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/developer-notes.md#rpc-interface-guidelines).
This is a follow up for #20226
**Before:**
```
Result:
[ (json array) Response is an array of descriptor objects
{ (json object)
"desc" : "str", (string) Descriptor string representation
"timestamp" : n, (numeric) The creation time of the descriptor
"active" : true|false, (boolean) Activeness flag
"internal" : true|false, (boolean, optional) Whether this is internal or external descriptor; defined only for active descriptors
"range" : [ (json array, optional) Defined only for ranged descriptors
n, (numeric) Range start inclusive
n (numeric) Range end inclusive
],
"next" : n (numeric, optional) The next index to generate addresses from; defined only for ranged descriptors
},
...
]
```
**After:**
```
Result:
{ (json object)
"wallet_name" : "str", (string) Name of wallet this operation was performed on
"descriptors" : [ (json array) Array of descriptor objects
{ (json object)
"desc" : "str", (string) Descriptor string representation
"timestamp" : n, (numeric) The creation time of the descriptor
"active" : true|false, (boolean) Activeness flag
"internal" : true|false, (boolean, optional) Whether this is internal or external descriptor; defined only for active descriptors
"range" : [ (json array, optional) Defined only for ranged descriptors
n, (numeric) Range start inclusive
n (numeric) Range end inclusive
],
"next" : n (numeric, optional) The next index to generate addresses from; defined only for ranged descriptors
},
...
]
}
```
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK 2e5f7def22e1b212fbd69e9147145d9d1f408aaf
meshcollider:
utACK 2e5f7def22e1b212fbd69e9147145d9d1f408aaf
jonatack:
re-ACK 2e5f7def22e1b212fbd69e9147145d9d1f408aaf
Tree-SHA512: 49bf73e46e2a61003ce594a4bfc506eb9592ccb799c2909c43a1a527490a4b4009f78dc09f3d47b4e945d3d7bb3cd2632cf48c5ace5feed5066158cc010dddc1
1111896eb7865a7bc474ee2aa338c97c22a66c14 doc: Merge release notes (MarcoFalke)
faeba9819d81e0f41756a45db55030ec3ba9f044 rpc: Missing doc updates for bumpfee psbt update (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Stuff missed in #20891. Also merge release notes, so that it doesn't have to be done later.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 1111896eb7865a7bc474ee2aa338c97c22a66c14
Tree-SHA512: c9be5a3c944e2981c83546c4761277f1ad5fb9ba97bec80d073db4229924cb48fd23cb5638217c844e05af51d80507718dd201099cbe50819986b3c47c5df7e5
Adds updates that have been missed in commit
ea0a7ec949f0f7e212f0d8819f7a54cad2258bdd:
* RPC help doc update
* Release notes update
* Remove "mutable" keyword from lambda
90ae3d8ca68334ec712d67b21a8d4721c6d79788 doc: Add release notes for -deprecatedrpc=addresses and bitcoin-tx (Michael Dietz)
085b3a729952896ccd0e40c17df569f4421f5493 rpc: deprecate `addresses` and `reqSigs` from rpc outputs (Michael Dietz)
Pull request description:
Considering the limited applicability of `reqSigs` and the confusing output of `1` in all cases except bare multisig, the `addresses` and `reqSigs` outputs are removed for all rpc commands.
1) add a new sane "address" field (for outputs that have an identifiable address, which doesn't include bare multisig)
2) with -deprecatedrpc: leave "reqSigs" and "addresses" intact (with all weird/wrong behavior they have now)
3) without -deprecatedrpc: drop "reqSigs" and "addresses" entirely always.
Note: Some light refactoring done to allow us to very easily delete a few chunks of code (marked with TODOs) when we remove this deprecated behavior.
Using `IsDeprecatedRPCEnabled` in core_write.cpp caused some circular dependencies involving core_io
Circular dependencies were caused by rpc/util unnecessarily importing node/coinstats and node/transaction. Really what rpc/util needs are some fundamental type/helper-function definitions. So this was cleaned up to make more sense.
This fixes#20102.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 90ae3d8ca68334ec712d67b21a8d4721c6d79788 📢
Tree-SHA512: 8ffb617053b5f4a8b055da17c06711fd19632e0037d71c4c8135e50c8cd7a19163989484e4e0f17a6cc48bd597f04ecbfd609aef54b7d1d1e76a784214fcf72a
1) add a new sane "address" field (for outputs that have an
identifiable address, which doesn't include bare multisig)
2) with -deprecatedrpc: leave "reqSigs" and "addresses" intact
(with all weird/wrong behavior they have now)
3) without -deprecatedrpc: drop "reqSigs" and "addresses" entirely,
always.
ebc4ab721b0371c0ef217c0f5bd7d42613e951e6 refactor: post Optional<> removal cleanups (fanquake)
57e980d13ca488031bde6ef197cf34d493d36796 scripted-diff: remove Optional & nullopt (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Same rationale & motivation as #21404, which turned out to be quite low in the number of potential conflicts. Lets see what the bot has to say here.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK ebc4ab721b0371c0ef217c0f5bd7d42613e951e6: patch looks correct
jnewbery:
utACK ebc4ab721b0371c0ef217c0f5bd7d42613e951e6
laanwj:
Code review ACK ebc4ab721b0371c0ef217c0f5bd7d42613e951e6
Tree-SHA512: 550fbeef09b9d35ddefaa805d1755c18c8fd499c4b0f77ebfece8c20296a7abd1cf6c699e2261f92fe3552deeb7555ec2a2287ffe3ab9e98bb9f8612a4d43be3
57ff5a42ab89c2774387b53248bbf5902de086b4 doc: specify minimum HWI version (Sjors Provoost)
03308b2bfaef5cdf2337a1e8f63edf043d98a7c0 rpc: don't require wallet for enumeratesigners (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
HWI just released 2.0. See https://github.com/bitcoin-core/HWI/releases/tag/2.0.0
As of #16546 we already rely on features that are in 2.0 and not in the previous 1.* releases:
* `--chain` param
This shouldn't be a problem, because HWI 2.0 has been released before we release v22.
Misc improvements:
* document that HWI 2.0 is required
* drop wallet requirement for `enumeratesigners`
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
Code Review ACK 57ff5a42ab89c2774387b53248bbf5902de086b4
Tree-SHA512: 3fb6ba20894e52a116f89525a5f5a1f61d363ccd904e1cffd0e6d095640fc6d2edf0388cd6ae20f83bbc31e5f458255ec090b6e823798d426eba3e45b4336bf9
f9cd2bfbccb7a2b8ff07cec5f6d2adbeca5f07c3 Rename CoinSelectionParams::effective_fee to m_effective_feerate (Andrew Chow)
bdd0c2934b7f389ffcfae3b602ee3ecee8581acd wallet: Move discard feerate fetching to CreateTransaction (Andrew Chow)
448d04b931f86941903e855f831249ff5ec77485 wallet: Move long term feerate setting to CreateTransaction (Andrew Chow)
e2f429e6bbf7098f278c0247b954ecd3ba53cf37 wallet: Replace nFeeRateNeeded with effective_fee (Andrew Chow)
1a6a0b0dfb90f9ebd4b86d7934c6aa5594974f5f wallet: Use existing feerate instead of getting a new one (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
During coin selection, there are various places where we need to have a feerate. We need the feerate for the transaction itself, the discard fee rate, and long term feerate. Fetching these each time we need them can lead to a race condition where two feerates that should be the same are actually different. One particular instance where this can happen is during the loop in `CreateTransactionInternal`. After inputs are chosen, the expected transaction fee is calculated using a newly fetched feerate. If `pick_new_inputs == false`, the loop will go again with the assumption that the fee for the transaction remains the same. However because the feerate is fetched again, it is possible that it actually isn't and this causes coin selection to fail.
Instead of fetching the feerate each time it is needed, we fetch them all at once at the top of `CreateTransactionInternal`, store them in `CoinSelectionParams`, and use them where needed.
While some of these fee rates probably don't need this caching, I've done it for consistency and the guarantee that they remain the same.
Fixes#19229
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
reACK f9cd2bfbcc
fjahr:
Code review re-ACK f9cd2bfbccb7a2b8ff07cec5f6d2adbeca5f07c3
Xekyo:
tACK f9cd2bfbcc
meshcollider:
Code review + test run ACK f9cd2bfbccb7a2b8ff07cec5f6d2adbeca5f07c3
Tree-SHA512: be83ff64ba473c3cdd3469c812e214659b6e2a9584c22ed2b1595618fce0d4b35d0901e61068cd1069fc1a8fb911db01dd7312d05c3b8cbafbe2504ab7a3e863
Instead of fetching the discard feerate for each SelectCoinsMinConf
iteration, fetch and cache it once during CreateTransaction so that it
is shared for each SelectCoinsMinConf through
coin_selection_params.m_discard_feerate.
Does not change behavior.
Instead of setting the long term feerate for each SelectCoinsMinConf
iteration, set it once during CreateTransaction and let it be shared
with each SelectCoinsMinConf through
coin_selection_params.m_long_term_feerate.
Does not change behavior.
Make sure that all fee calculations use the same feerate.
coin_selection_params.effective_fee is the variable we use for all fee
calculations, so get rid of remaining nFeeRateNeeded usages and just
directly set coin_selection_params.effective_fee.
Does not change behavior.
During each loop of CreateTransaction, instead of constantly getting a
new feerate, use the feerate that we have already fetched for all
fee calculations. Thix fixes a race condition where the feerate required
changes during each iteration of the loop.
This commit changes behavior as the "Fee estimation failed" error will
now take priority over "Signing transaction failed".
9048c58e10841d9e1d709c0a325dd14684cec325 Remove pointer cast in CRPCTable::dumpArgMap (Russell Yanofsky)
14f3d9b908ed9e78997bfaad3d8a06357a89d46e refactor: Add RPC server ExecuteCommands function (Russell Yanofsky)
6158a6d3978a18d5ac4166ca2f59056d8ef71c3d refactor: Replace JSONRPCRequest fHelp field with mode field (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This change is needed to fix the `rpc_help.py` test failing in #10102: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5469433013469184?command=ci#L2275
The [`CRPCTable::dumpArgMap`](16b784d953/src/rpc/server.cpp (L492)) method currently works by casting RPC `unique_id` integer field to a function pointer, and then calling it. The `unique_id` field wasn't supposed to be used this way (it's meant to be used to detect RPC aliases) and as a result, this code segfaults in the `rpc_help.py` test in multiprocess PR #10102 because wallet RPC functions aren't directly accessible from the node process.
Fix this by adding a new `GET_ARGS` RPC request mode to retrieve argument information similar to the way the `GET_HELP` mode retrieves help information.
---
This PR is part of the [process separation project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/10).
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 9048c58e10841d9e1d709c0a325dd14684cec325 👑
Tree-SHA512: cd1a01c1daa5bde2c2455b63548371ee4cf39688313969ad2016d9a0fd4344102e3fd43034058f253364518e9632d57cf21abffad0d6a2c0c94b7a6921cbe615
7c90c67b7e6f598f9ffdc136ded2b533b78ed044 rpc: refactor rpc wallet functions to take references instead of pointers (fanquake)
48669340080feaff86b8fc0403ef22c820477697 rpc: remove calls to CWallet.get() (fanquake)
Pull request description:
This is a rebased #18592.
> This PR replaces raw pointers in `rpcwallet.cpp` and `rpcdump.cpp` with **shared_ptr**. The motivation for this PR is described here https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/18590
> It seems that this PR is indirectly related to this issue: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13063#discussion_r186740049
> Notice: I have deliberately **not** changed the class `WalletRescanReserver ` whose constructor expects a raw pointer, because it's external and affects other areas, which I didn't touch to avoid making this PR "viral".
> Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/18590
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 7c90c67b7e6f598f9ffdc136ded2b533b78ed044 🐧
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 7c90c67b7e6f598f9ffdc136ded2b533b78ed044. Changes easy to review with `--word-diff-regex=. -U0`
Tree-SHA512: 32d69c813026b02260e8a89de9d6a5ab9e87826ba230687246583ac7a80c8c3fd00318da4658f1450e04c23d2c77ae765862de0d2a110b1312b3b69a1161e7ba
fa4e088cbac035b8029a10b492849540150d0622 wallet: Mark replaced tx to not be in the mempool anymore (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The wallet does not mark the replaced tx as out-of-mempool. This causes failures in user scripts, because later RPCs may depend on this state change from `bumpfee`.
For example, the following might fail on current master:
```
txid = sendtoaddress(...)
bumpfee(txid)
abandontransaction(txid) # fails because txid is still marked as "in mempool"
```
Fixes#18831
ACKs for top commit:
meshcollider:
utACK fa4e088cbac035b8029a10b492849540150d0622
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fa4e088cbac035b8029a10b492849540150d0622, and previous ACK faeedff5c87091fd83d2fb2b29eb49c948363f29 is also still valid in case there's a preference for the original fix
Tree-SHA512: 9858f40f5fb5a43a7b584b5c4268b6befa82e6a84583be5206fe721bcb6c255e8d35479d347d0b9aed72703df49887c02b14ab680e8efdd28b90dd6b93d9439a
48a0319babb409cf486a9eb7c776810f70b06cb2 Add a test that selects too large if BnB is used (Andrew Chow)
3e69939b78d0143d514c5d9b6c6a9844c9bb901c Fail if maximum weight is too large (Andrew Chow)
51e2cd322cfc7271af309e3a2243448a2ec0cad4 Have CalculateMaximumSignedTxSize also compute tx weight (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Currently the `Transaction too large` is calculated on the transaction that is returned from `CreateTransaction`. This does not make sense for when `CreateTransaction` is being used for `fundrawtransaction` as no signing occurs so the final returned transaction is missing signatures. Thus users may successfully fund a transaction but fail to broadcast it after it has been fully signed.
So instead we should figure out whether the transaction we are funding will be too large after it is signed. We can do this by having `CalculateMaximumSignedTxSize` also return the transaction weight and then comparing that weight against the maximum weight.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK 48a0319bab
meshcollider:
utACK 48a0319babb409cf486a9eb7c776810f70b06cb2
Xekyo:
utACK with nits 48a0319babb409cf486a9eb7c776810f70b06cb2
Tree-SHA512: 1700c60b07f67e2d5c591c5ccd131ac9f1861fab3def961c3c9c4b3281ec1063fe8e4f0f7f1038cac72692340856406bcee8fb45c8104d2ad34357a0ec878ac7
