830ddf413934226d0b6ca99165916790cc52ca18 Drop noop gcc version checks (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Since #20413 the minimum required GCC version is 7.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 830ddf413934226d0b6ca99165916790cc52ca18
Tree-SHA512: 36264661d6ced1683a0c907efba7c700502acaf8e9fd50d9066bc9c7b877b25165b0684c2d7fe74bd58e500a77d7702bdbdd53691c274f29e4abccd241c10964
8008ef770f3d0b14d03e22371314500373732143 qt: unlock wallet "OK" button bugfix (Michael Dietz)
Pull request description:
When trying to send a transaction from an encrypted wallet, the ask
passphrase dialog would not allow the user to click the "OK" button
and proceed. Therefore it was impossible to send a transaction
through the gui. It was not enabling the "OK" button after the
passphrase was entered by the user, because it was using the same
form validation logic as the "Change passphrase" flow.
I reported this in a comment in https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/issues/136. But then I realized this seems to be a flat out bug.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 8008ef770f3d0b14d03e22371314500373732143
hebasto:
ACK 8008ef770f3d0b14d03e22371314500373732143, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: cc09b34c7f3aea09729e1c7ccccff05dc11fec56fee2ad369f2d862979572b1edd8b7e738ffe6e91d35d071b819b0c3e0f5d48bf5e27427a80af4a28893f8aaf
89bdad5b25ae4ac03a486f729a5b58ae6f21946d RPC/Wallet: unloadwallet: Allow specifying wallet_name param matching RPC endpoint (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
Allow specifying the `wallet_name` param to `unloadwallet` on RPC wallet endpoints, so long as it matches the endpoint wallet.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 89bdad5b25ae4ac03a486f729a5b58ae6f21946d
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 89bdad5b25ae4ac03a486f729a5b58ae6f21946d
Tree-SHA512: efb399c33f7b5596870a26a8680f453ca47aa7a6db4e550f9435d13044f1c4bad0ae11e8f0205213409d08b75c4188c3be782e54aafab1f65b97eb8cf5c252a9
When trying to send a transaction from an encrypted wallet, the ask
passphrase dialog would not allow the user to click the "OK" button
and proceed. Therefore it was impossible to send a transaction
through the gui. It was not enabling the "OK" button after the
passphrase was entered by the user, because it was using the same
form validation logic as the "Change passphrase" flow.
Bitcoin core has a standardness rule for max satisfaction script sig size.
This PR adds to the policy header file so that it is documented along with
along policy rules. The initial reasoning that 1650 is an implicit
limit(would not reached assuming all other policy rules are being
followed) is outdated.
As we now know, bitcoin transactions can have spend conditions are more than
just signatures and there may exist p2sh transactions involving 100 byte
preimages that maybe non-standard because of this rule. Because this
rule is no longer implicit, we should explicitly document it in policy
header file
95975dd08d8fdaaeaf28e0d06b861ce2748c17b6 sync: detect double lock from the same thread (Vasil Dimov)
4df6567e4cbb4677e8048de2f8008612e1b860b9 sync: make EnterCritical() & push_lock() type safe (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
Double lock of the same (non-recursive) mutex from the same thread would produce an undefined behavior. Detect this from `DEBUG_LOCKORDER` and react similarly to the deadlock detection.
This came up during discussion in another, related PR: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19238#discussion_r442394521.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
code review ACK 95975dd08d8fdaaeaf28e0d06b861ce2748c17b6
hebasto:
re-ACK 95975dd08d8fdaaeaf28e0d06b861ce2748c17b6
Tree-SHA512: 375c62db7819e348bfaecc3bd82a7907fcd8f5af24f7d637ac82f3f16789da9fc127dbd0e37158a08e0dcbba01a55c6635caf1d8e9e827cf5a3747f7690a498e
e3e7446305329ce96e9cf5f5161658eb2e1ea888 Add lifetimebound to attributes for general-purpose usage (Cory Fields)
1d58cc7cb040a70f768b632f294db4e0797d3a34 span: add lifetimebound attribute (Cory Fields)
62733fee874bfe7e833e71380eb8efd6a3126fbd span: (almost) match std::span's constructor behavior (Cory Fields)
Pull request description:
Replaces #19382 with a different approach. See [this comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19382#discussion_r446332852) for the reasoning behind the switch.
--
Description from #19382:
See [here](http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p0936r0.pdf) for more detail on lifetimebound.
This is implemented using preprocesor macros rather than configure checks in order to keep span.h self-contained.
The ```[[clang::lifetimebound]]``` syntax was chosen over ```__attribute__((lifetimebound))``` because the former is more flexible and works to guard ```this``` as well as function parameters, and also because at least for now, it's available only in clang.
There are currently no violations in our codebase, but this can easily be tested by inserting one like this somewhere and compiling with a modern clang:
```c++
Span<const int> bad(std::vector<int>{1,2,3});
```
The result:
> warning: temporary whose address is used as value of local variable 'bad' will be destroyed at the end of the full-expression [-Wdangling]
Span<const int> bad(std::vector<int>{1,2,3});
```
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
ACK e3e7446305329ce96e9cf5f5161658eb2e1ea888
ajtowns:
ACK e3e7446305329ce96e9cf5f5161658eb2e1ea888 (drive by; only a quick skim of code and some basic sanity checks)
MarcoFalke:
review ACK e3e7446305329ce96e9cf5f5161658eb2e1ea888 🔗
jonatack:
ACK e3e7446 change since last review is adding `[[clang::lifetimebound]]` as `LIFETIMEBOUND` to src/attributes.h as suggested in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19387#issuecomment-650752959.
Tree-SHA512: 05a3440ee595ef0e8d693a2820b360707695c016a68e15df47c20cd8d053646cc6c8cca8addd7db40e72b3fce208879a41c8102ba7ae9223e4366e5de1175211
3eb6f8b2e61c24a22ea9396d86672307845f35eb wallet (not for backport): improve upgradewallet error messages (Jon Atack)
ca8cd893bb56bf5d455154b0498b1f58f77d20ed wallet: fix and improve upgradewallet error responses (Jon Atack)
99d56e357159c7154f69f28cb5587c5ca20d6594 wallet: fix and improve upgradewallet result responses (Jon Atack)
2498b04ce88696a3216fc38b7d393906b733e8b1 Don't upgrade to HD split if it is already supported (Andrew Chow)
c46c18b788cb0862aafbb116fd37936cbed6a431 wallet: refactor GetClosestWalletFeature() (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This follows up on #18836 and #20282 to fix and improve the as-yet unreleased `upgradewallet` feature and also implement review follow-up in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18836#discussion_r519328607.
This PR fixes 4 upgradewallet issues:
- this bug: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20403#discussion_r526063920
- it returns nothing in the absence of an RPC error, which isn't reassuring for users
- it returns the same thing both in the case of a successful upgrade and when no upgrade took place
- the error message object is currently dead code
This PR fixes the above and provides:
...user feedback to not silently return without upgrading
```
{
"wallet_name": "disable private keys",
"previous_version": 169900,
"current_version": 169900,
"result": "Already at latest version. Wallet version unchanged."
}
```
...better feedback after successfully upgrading
```
{
"wallet_name": "watch-only",
"previous_version": 159900,
"current_version": 169900,
"result": "Wallet upgraded successfully from version 159900 to version 169900."
}
```
...helpful error responses
```
{
"wallet_name": "blank",
"previous_version": 169900,
"current_version": 169900,
"error": "Cannot downgrade wallet from version 169900 to version 159900. Wallet version unchanged."
}
{
"wallet_name": "blank",
"previous_version": 130000,
"current_version": 130000,
"error": "Cannot upgrade a non HD split wallet from version 130000 to version 169899 without upgrading to support pre-split keypool. Please use version 169900 or no version specified."
}
```
updated help:
```
upgradewallet ( version )
Upgrade the wallet. Upgrades to the latest version if no version number is specified.
New keys may be generated and a new wallet backup will need to be made.
Arguments:
1. version (numeric, optional, default=169900) The version number to upgrade to. Default is the latest wallet version.
Result:
{ (json object)
"wallet_name" : "str", (string) Name of wallet this operation was performed on
"previous_version" : n, (numeric) Version of wallet before this operation
"current_version" : n, (numeric) Version of wallet after this operation
"result" : "str", (string, optional) Description of result, if no error
"error" : "str" (string, optional) Error message (if there is one)
}
```
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 3eb6f8b
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 3eb6f8b2e61c24a22ea9396d86672307845f35eb 🛡
Tree-SHA512: b767314069e26b5933b123acfea6aa40708507f504bdb22884da020a4ca1332af38a7072b061e36281533af9f4e236d94d3c129daf6fe5b55241127537038eed
e95aaefe2540cb76969818fcc2ff77d33448ed5a build: Avoid secp256k1.h include from system (Niklas Gögge)
Pull request description:
While building i ran into an error because i had a version of `secp256k1.h` under `/usr/local/include` that was incompatible with the secp256k1 code in the repository. This caused a problem because `$(BOOST_CPPFLAGS)` contained `-I/usr/local/include` and the include paths are searched by the compiler in order from left to right, so in the end `$(BITCOIN_INCLUDES)` contained `-I/usr/local/include` before `-I$(srcdir)/secp256k1/include` which caused the compiler to find `secp256k1.h` under `/usr/local/include`.
Looking at git blame i am wondering how this has not happened to anyone else in several years: cb89e18845/src/Makefile.am (L25)
I am on macOS 10.15.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK e95aaefe2540cb76969818fcc2ff77d33448ed5a
hebasto:
ACK e95aaefe2540cb76969818fcc2ff77d33448ed5a, tested on macOS 11 Big Sur by adding `#error` into `/usr/local/include/secp256k1.h`.
Tree-SHA512: 1f0b395725936c179ab60dee3582ec7b21e2f9c0f1895e160d84a487cf0db16d0c7aa47d05800e0aded31685b4362056cac9b9ecca1bb8c308a4c5a810e8dc1d
fa69c2c78455fd0dc436018fece9ff7fc83a180d wallet: Do not treat default constructed types as None-type (MarcoFalke)
fac4e136fa3d0fab7fde900a6be921313e16e7a6 refactor: Change pointer to reference because it can not be null (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Equating `0==None` and `""==None` is confusing, unneeded and undocumented
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK fa69c2c78455fd0dc436018fece9ff7fc83a180d
achow101:
ACK fa69c2c78455fd0dc436018fece9ff7fc83a180d
Sjors:
tACK fa69c2c78455fd0dc436018fece9ff7fc83a180d modulo `unset`
Tree-SHA512: c4c8d0ad80c6697621d356a9545caf28ca2facc82bb2fa8e70eceb52372d25f0685237c73688c4b01da0e75d213c77c0d45011a8bdfe81ea783d85f045786dac
05c10953887bd78af2e21ef6d3c07f90dd885572 test: Add testing of ParseInt/ParseUInt edge cases with leading +/-/0:s (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Add testing of `ParseInt`/`ParseUInt` edge cases with leading `+`/`-`/`0`:s.
Context: While working on #20457 and #20452 I noticed some edge cases which our unit tests are currently not covering.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 05c10953887bd78af2e21ef6d3c07f90dd885572
laanwj:
Code review ACK 05c10953887bd78af2e21ef6d3c07f90dd885572
jonatack:
ACK 05c10953887bd78af2e21ef6d3c07f90dd885572
promag:
Code review ACK 05c10953887bd78af2e21ef6d3c07f90dd885572.
Tree-SHA512: bdfb94d8fa0293512dbba89907cb6dd0f8b1418d878267dd6d49c8c397a0e5b9714441345565d41a6a909a1cda052ef7cccece822f355ff604fcf85f2dc8136f
b1f59d55d920d2b35269b474762f94fec87bfb16 RPC/Wallet: unloadwallet: Clarify docs/error when both the RPC endpoint and wallet_name parameter specify a wallet (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
Just documentation clarifications from #20448
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK b1f59d55d920d2b35269b474762f94fec87bfb16
jonatack:
re-ACK b1f59d55d920d2b35269b474762f94fec87bfb16 per `git diff e8303a0 b1f59d5`
Tree-SHA512: ac068b0aa7ceed49496367fdd9425b59dbba18b56e89b26afc22a6c8ece51f0b92a169cacd55740b1cadab2b32f4f8e8700e609066ab7e59d3b53c7891da585e
d52f502b1ea1cafa7d58c5517f01dba26ecb7269 Fix mock SQLiteDatabases (Andrew Chow)
99309ab3e96a290359b84f9b657c5115aa3470dd Allow disabling BDB in configure with --without-bdb (Andrew Chow)
ee47f11f7399ec3a4330ea1f2fc388c7e32959d6 GUI: Force descriptor wallets when BDB is not compiled (Andrew Chow)
71e40b33bd1e72ccf5d82e1d3f8b481f8e965492 RPC: Require descriptors=True for createwallet when BDB is not compiled (Andrew Chow)
6ebc41bf9cb0184554923e84e1935195d356f2b3 Enforce salvage is only for BDB wallets (Andrew Chow)
a58b719cf75e2d97205ec260bcff0d4780fe4fb8 Do not compile BDB things when USE_BDB is defined (Andrew Chow)
b33af48210c117a734fc3e1bebeb1c2057645775 Include wallet/bdb.h where it is actually being used (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Adds a `--without-bdb` option to `configure` which disables the compilation of the BDB stuff. Legacy wallets will not be created when BDB is not compiled. A legacy-sqlite wallet can be loaded, but we will not create them.
Based on #20156 to resolve the situation where both `--without-sqlite` and `--without-bdb` are provided. In that case, the wallet is disabled and `--disable-wallet` is effectively set.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK d52f502b1ea1cafa7d58c5517f01dba26ecb7269
Tree-SHA512: 5a92ba7a542acc2e27003e9d4e5940e0d02d5c1f110db06cdcab831372bfd83e8d89c269caff31dd5bff062c1cf5f04683becff12bd23a33be731676f346553d
fabecce71909c984504c21fa05f91d5f1b471e8c net: Treat raw message bytes as uint8_t (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Using `uint8_t` from the beginning when messages are `recv`ed has two style benefits:
* The signedness is clear from reading the code, as it does not depend on the architecture
* When passing the bytes on, the need for static signedness casts is dropped, making the code a bit less verbose and more coherent
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK fabecce71909c984504c21fa05f91d5f1b471e8c
theStack:
Code Review ACK fabecce71909c984504c21fa05f91d5f1b471e8c
jonatack:
Tested ACK fabecce71909c984504c21fa05f91d5f1b471e8c
Tree-SHA512: e6d9803c78633fde3304faf592afa961ff9462a7912d1da97a24720265274aa10ab4168d71b6ec2756b7448dd42585321afee0e5c889e705be778ce9a330d145
9f08780dd7946b63476e9736745131db8e7f4e93 Use the correct incremental fee constant in bumpfee help (Jon Atack)
3f1e10b2b1cd11f7112fbad6355464bd4adbbc5c Update feeRate (BTC/kvB) to fee_rate (sat/vB) in wallet_bumpfee (Jon Atack)
1b3d7009280595108eb22ac1188bc4367804fc5d Allow zero-fee fundrawtxn and walletcreatefundedpsbt calls (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
- Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20305/files#r525406176. A check to raise an error on zero-fee txns was mistakenly extended in a0d4957 from the bumpfee and send{toaddress, many} RPCs to also include fundrawtransaction and walletcreatefundedpsbt. This commit re-overrides zero fee rate checking for these two RPCs, not only for the feeRate (BTC/kvB) arg to return to previous behavior, but also for the new fee_rate (sat/vB) arg. Negative fee rates will still raise "amount out of range" by the MoneyRange check in src/bitcoin-tx.cpp::AmountFromValue.
- Updates a wallet bumpfee test from feeRate (BTC/kvB) to fee_rate (sat/vB)
- Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20305/files#r525405363 to use the correct incremental fee rate constant in the bumpfee help (thanks Marco Falke for the catch) and rectifies "1.000 sat/vB sat/vB" in the help to "1.000 sat/vB"
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 9f08780dd7946b63476e9736745131db8e7f4e93 🐾
promag:
Code review ACK 9f08780dd7946b63476e9736745131db8e7f4e93.
Xekyo:
Code review reACK 9f08780dd7946b63476e9736745131db8e7f4e93.
Tree-SHA512: 413dfb4f23ebaf3d2ef210dd04610a843272e64eabba428699f5de4d646a86ac4911dab66b5e2f5ebea53b76e4be8347ef40824c1592c750d5eaa12579d3cdf6
8f7b93047581c67f2133cdb8c7845471de66c30f Drop the leading 0 from the version number (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Removes the leading 0 from the version number. The minor version, which we had been using as the major version, is now the major version. The revision, which we had been using as the minor version, is now the minor version. The revision number is dropped. The build number is promoted to being part of the version number. This also avoids issues where it was accidentally not included in the version number.
The CLIENT_VERSION remains the same format as previous as previously, as the Major version was 0 so it never actually got included in it.
The user agent string formatter is updated to follow this new versioning.
***
Honestly I'm just tired of all of the people asking for "1.0" that maybe this'll shut them up. Skip the whole 1.0 thing and go straight to version 22.0!
Also, this means that the terminology we commonly use lines up with how the variables are named. So major versions are actually bumping the major version number, etc.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
Code review ACK 8f7b930475
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 8f7b93047581c67f2133cdb8c7845471de66c30f 🎻
Tree-SHA512: b5c3fae14d4c0a9c0ab3b1db7c949ecc0ac3537646306b13d98dd0efc17c489cdd16d43f0a24aaa28e9c4a92ea360500e05480a335b03f9fb308010cdd93a436
2a55a0ed3055a2ce0a33b58a3a7bbf6e30df3dfd Squashed 'src/univalue/' changes from 98261b1e7b..98fadc0909 (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Just a minor bugfix: Currently we don't push booleans into arrays, but if we did they'd be pushed as integers.
Can be tested by reverting the diff in `include/` and observing a test failure.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK fa17eef6274811be5348149443e563bca95d54a3
practicalswift:
cr ACK fa17eef6274811be5348149443e563bca95d54a3
Tree-SHA512: d87ca5be6769b4cd0c9b9e319973bc0c4f2b7121779f9554e11f34a4edb0013997e875c7edb7bc6eb9309ff5c13379d22f436cd4fb9e6e68df6f0aee29fed914
A check to raise an error on zero-fee txns was mistakenly extended in commit
a0d4957 from the bumpfee and send{toaddress, many} RPCs to also include
fundrawtransaction and walletcreatefundedpsbt.
This commit overrides zero fee rate checking for these two RPCs, not only for
the feeRate (BTC/kvB) arg to return to previous behavior, but also for the new
fee_rate (sat/vB) arg.
76277cc77dea39b53e09ee1c440cd37270826201 qt: Hide peer detail view if multiple are selected (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Currently if multiple peers are selected the peer detail view shows the first new selected peer.
With this PR the peer detail view is hidden when multiple peers are selected. It is also a slight refactor to simplify and remove duplicate code.
ACKs for top commit:
jonasschnelli:
Tested ACK 76277cc77dea39b53e09ee1c440cd37270826201.
hebasto:
ACK 76277cc77dea39b53e09ee1c440cd37270826201, tested on Linux Mint 20 (Qt 5.12.8).
Tree-SHA512: 16c9cfd6ccb7077a9f31917a6cb3532e32d17d21f735e43bf4720fb0c8bb1bd539d42569c105df4b551f5dccb4acaeedb6bb2362620a9cb9267a602d9d065b9f
2fc5efc55c886f1b874ce6cd02c9082b5bb6435a Update pruning tooltip, original author BitcoinErrorLog (Riccardo Spagni)
Pull request description:
Squashed commits from BitcoinErrorLog at his request, per the original discussion on #15: this tooltip has been adjusted to be more user-friendly and reflect what the net effect of pruning is for the user.
ACKs for top commit:
harding:
Untested ACK 2fc5efc55c886f1b874ce6cd02c9082b5bb6435a
Sjors:
utACK 2fc5efc55c886f1b874ce6cd02c9082b5bb6435a and welcome to the dark side!
jonasschnelli:
ACK 2fc5efc55c886f1b874ce6cd02c9082b5bb6435a
Tree-SHA512: 45d6a7efbf4d34d20b9de439c988a39c739591b854726b6682c4cffcb23dff7d9131afab572fa0c9a8bc033c46c3878efdfbf8a984aafde632e1dfc1caa1cbbb
fa5ed3b4ca609426b2622cad235e107d33db7b30 net: Use Span in ReceiveMsgBytes (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Pass a data pointer and a size as span in `ReceiveMsgBytes` to get the benefits of a span
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK fa5ed3b4ca609426b2622cad235e107d33db7b30 code review, rebased to current master 12a1c3ad1a43634, debug build, unit tests, ran bitcoind/-netinfo/getpeerinfo
theStack:
ACK fa5ed3b4ca609426b2622cad235e107d33db7b30
Tree-SHA512: 89bf111323148d6e6e50185ad20ab39f73ab3a58a27e46319e3a08bcf5dcf9d6aa84faff0fd6afb90cb892ac2f557a237c144560986063bc736a69ace353ab9d
c92387232f750397da7d131f262c150a608408c2 refactor: Extract ParseOpCode from ParseScript (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Seems more natural to have `mapOpNames` "hidden" in `ParseOpCode` than in `ParseScript`.
A second lookup in `mapOpNames` is also removed.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK c92387232f750397da7d131f262c150a608408c2
theStack:
re-ACK c92387232f750397da7d131f262c150a608408c2
Tree-SHA512: d59d1964760622cf365479d44e3e676aa0bf46b60e77160140d967e012042df92121d3224c7551dc96eff5ff3294598cc6bade82adb3f60d28810e18e60e1257
ecc6cf1a3b097b9b5b047282063a0b6779631b83 test: fix creation of std::string objects with \0s (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
A string literal `"abc"` contains a terminating `\0`, so that is 4
bytes. There is no need to write `"abc\0"` unless two terminating
`\0`s are necessary.
`std::string` objects do not internally contain a terminating `\0`, so
`std::string("abc")` creates a string with size 3 and is the same as
`std::string("abc", 3)`.
In `"\01"` the `01` part is interpreted as one number (1) and that is
the same as `"\1"` which is a string like `{1, 0}` whereas `"\0z"` is a
string like `{0, 'z', 0}`. To create a string like `{0, '1', 0}` one
must use `"\0" "1"`.
Adjust the tests accordingly.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK ecc6cf1a3b097b9b5b047282063a0b6779631b83
practicalswift:
ACK ecc6cf1a3b097b9b5b047282063a0b6779631b83 modulo happily green CI
Tree-SHA512: 5eb489e8533a4199a9324b92f7280041552379731ebf7dfee169f70d5458e20e29b36f8bfaee6f201f48ab2b9d1d0fc4bdf8d6e4c58d6102f399cfbea54a219e
705c1f0648c72aa97e0ee699ff9a3da23fc9bd61 qt, refactor: Fix 'buttonClicked is deprecated' warnings (Hennadii Stepanov)
c2f4e5ea1d6f01713ac69aaf6018884028aa55bd qt, refactor: Fix 'split is deprecated' warnings (Hennadii Stepanov)
8e12d6996116e786e928077b22d9f47cee27319e qt, refactor: Fix 'QFlags is deprecated' warnings (Hennadii Stepanov)
fa5749c805878304c107bcae0ae5ffa401dc7c4d qt, refactor: Fix 'pixmap is deprecated' warnings (Hennadii Stepanov)
b02264cb5dfcef50eec8a6346471cbaa25370e00 qt, refactor: Fix 'QDateTime is deprecated' warnings (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
[What's New in Qt 5.15](https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/whatsnew515.html#deprecated-modules):
> To help preparing for the transition to Qt 6, numerous classes and member functions that will be removed from Qt 6.0 have been marked as deprecated in the Qt 5.15 release.
Fixes#36
ACKs for top commit:
jonasschnelli:
utACK 705c1f0648c72aa97e0ee699ff9a3da23fc9bd61
promag:
Tested ACK 705c1f0648c72aa97e0ee699ff9a3da23fc9bd61 on macos with Apple clang version 11.0.3 (clang-1103.0.32.62) and brew qt 5.15.1.
Tree-SHA512: 29e00535b4583ceec0dfb29612e86ee29bdea13651b548c6d22167917a4a10464af49160a12b05151030699f690f437ebb9c4ae9f130f66a722415222165b44f
0000a0c7e9e4e7c1afafe6ef75b7624f4c573190 Remove confusing and almost useless "unexpected version" warning (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
It is useless because it isn't displayed for most users:
* It isn't displayed in normal operation (because the validation debug category is disabled by default)
* It isn't displayed for users that sync up their nodes intermittently, e.g. once a day or once a week (because it is disabled for IBD)
* It is only displayed in the debug log (as opposed to the versionbits warning, which is displayed more prominently)
It is confusing because it doesn't have a use case:
Despite the above, if a user *did* see the warning, it would most likely be a false positive (like it has been in the past). Even if it wasn't, there is nothing they can do about it. The only thing they could do is to check for updates and hope that a fixed version is available. But why would the user be so scrupulously precise in enabling the warning and reading the log, but then fail to regularly check update channels for updated software?
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK 0000a0c7e9e4e7c1afafe6ef75b7624f4c573190
decryp2kanon:
ACK 0000a0c
LarryRuane:
ACK 0000a0c7e9e4e7c1afafe6ef75b7624f4c573190
Tree-SHA512: 16e069c84be6ab6034baeefdc515d0e5cdf560b2005d2faec5f989d45494bd16cfcb4ffca6a17211d9556ae44f9737a60a476c08b5c2bb5e1bd29724ecd6d5c1
0bfce9dc46234b196a8b3679c21d6f8455962495 [addrman] Fix Connected() comment (John Newbery)
eefe19471868ef0cdc9d32473d0b57015e7647ee [net] Consolidate logic around calling CAddrMan::Connected() (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Currently, the logic around whether we called CAddrMan::Connected() for
a peer is spread between verack processing (where we discard inbound
peers) and FinalizeNode (where we discard misbehaving and
block-relay-only peers). Consolidate that logic to a single place.
Also remove the CNode.fCurrentlyConnected bool, which is now
redundant. We can rely on CNode.fSuccessfullyConnected, since the two
bools were only ever flipped to true in the same place.
ACKs for top commit:
mzumsande:
Code review ACK 0bfce9dc46234b196a8b3679c21d6f8455962495
amitiuttarwar:
code review ACK 0bfce9dc46. nice tidy, and bonus that we get to remove an unnecessary call to `cs_main`
Tree-SHA512: 1ab74dae3bc12a6846da57c853033e546bb4f91caa39f4c50bf0cf7eca59cb917bdb2ef795da55363e7e9f70949cb28bb3be004cb3afa4389f970d2fe097d932
ea93bbeb26948c0ddba39b589bd166eaecf446c8 init: Fix incorrect warning "Reducing -maxconnections from N to N-1, because of system limitations" (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Fix incorrect warning `Reducing -maxconnections from N to N-1, because of system limitations`.
Before this patch (only the first warning is correct):
```
$ src/bitcoind -maxconnections=10000000 | grep Warning
2020-09-26T01:23:45Z Warning: Reducing -maxconnections from 10000000 to 1048417, because of system limitations.
$ src/bitcoind -maxconnections=1000000 | grep Warning
2020-09-26T01:23:45Z Warning: Reducing -maxconnections from 1000000 to 999999, because of system limitations.
$ src/bitcoind -maxconnections=100000 | grep Warning
2020-09-26T01:23:45Z Warning: Reducing -maxconnections from 100000 to 99999, because of system limitations.
$ src/bitcoind -maxconnections=10000 | grep Warning
2020-09-26T01:23:45Z Warning: Reducing -maxconnections from 10000 to 9999, because of system limitations.
$ src/bitcoind -maxconnections=1000 | grep Warning
2020-09-26T01:23:45Z Warning: Reducing -maxconnections from 1000 to 999, because of system limitations.
$ src/bitcoind -maxconnections=100 | grep Warning
[no warning]
```
After this patch (no incorrect warnings):
```
$ src/bitcoind -maxconnections=10000000 | grep Warning
2020-09-26T01:23:45Z Warning: Reducing -maxconnections from 10000000 to 1048417, because of system limitations.
$ src/bitcoind -maxconnections=1000000 | grep Warning
[no warning]
$ src/bitcoind -maxconnections=100000 | grep Warning
[no warning]
$ src/bitcoind -maxconnections=10000 | grep Warning
[no warning]
$ src/bitcoind -maxconnections=1000 | grep Warning
[no warning]
$ src/bitcoind -maxconnections=100 | grep Warning
[no warning]
```
ACKs for top commit:
n-thumann:
tACK ea93bbeb26, Ran on other systems running Debian 10.5 (4.19.0-8-amd64) and Debian bullseye/sid (5.3.0-1-amd64) and was able to reproduce the issue exactly as you described above on both of them. After applying your patch the issue is fixed ✌️
laanwj:
Code review ACK ea93bbeb26948c0ddba39b589bd166eaecf446c8
theStack:
tACK ea93bbeb26948c0ddba39b589bd166eaecf446c8
Tree-SHA512: 9b0939a1a51fdf991d11024a5d20b4f39cab1a80320b799a1d24d0250aa059666bcb1ae6dd79c941c2f2686f07f59fc0f6618b5746aa8ca6011fdd202828a930
faaf9c58e4aa809019d4ca12747dd47411988e37 remove CRPCCommand constructor that takes rpcfn_type function pointer (MarcoFalke)
fa19bb2cd8c575593583138a84e6bb3444d6196d remove dead rpc code (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Remove the CRPCCommand arguments, now that they are asserted to be equal and thus redundant
### Future work
> Here or follow up, makes sense to also assert type of returned UniValue?
Sure, but let's not get ahead of ourselves. I am going to submit any further works as follow-ups, including:
* Removing all python regex linters on the args, now that RPCMan can be used to generate any output, including the cli.cpp table
* Auto-formatting and sanity checking the RPCExamples with RPCMan
* Checking passed-in json in self-check. Removing redundant checks
* Checking returned json against documentation to avoid regressions or false documentation
* Compile the RPC documentation at compile-time to ensure it doesn't change at runtime and is completely static
### Bugs found
* The assert identified issue #18607
* The changes itself fixed bug #19250
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
tested ACK faaf9c58e4aa809019d4ca12747dd47411988e37
promag:
Tested ACK faaf9c58e4aa809019d4ca12747dd47411988e37.
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK faaf9c58e4aa809019d4ca12747dd47411988e37. Two obviously good simplifications.
Tree-SHA512: 5de3b440f7b2ed2c3e86655d4f0e2e5df9c67e8ce3c7817d5ea5311d1a38690f2f3e28fab41aad6936be9fc884326d037e5f19e85d4d2fe281474dada13911ee
7486e2771e7b5d6fa84df6e954be76350c84e220 Tests: Unit test related to WalletDB ReadKeyValue (Bushstar)
32def8d1c29e0855fe5429687acabd2f29119316 Catch ios_base::failure specifically (Peter Bushnell)
Pull request description:
In https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/2950 a hash of the pubkey and private was added to speed up key import, this was made backwards compatible by reading the hash in a try block with an ellipses catch all in case the hash was not present.
CDataStream::read() specifically throws std::ios_base::failure, backwards compatibility expects only that error to be thrown, if something else gets thrown we should not be catching it. The change in this commit is to catch that exception only. If any other exception is thrown other than std::ios_base::failure it will be caught by the wider try block and an error written to the log and/or console.
CDataStream::read() throwing std::ios_base::failure.
2c364fde42/src/streams.h (L191)
Wider catch statements that pick up all others exceptions other than ios_base::failure.
2c364fde42/src/wallet/walletdb.cpp (L425)2c364fde42/src/wallet/walletdb.cpp (L430)
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 7486e2771e7b5d6fa84df6e954be76350c84e220
Tree-SHA512: 5364bf935af8ec603bf5b8fef8c23b5cdaa4fe3506090cff988413221f2eaa99f7a91929afb42a35f8881ce2328744a0d32052da51ca0a5b2e65b6809e97f604
330cb33985d0ce97c20f4a0f0bbda0fbffe098d4 src/randomenv.cpp: fix build on uclibc (Fabrice Fontaine)
Pull request description:
Check for HAVE_STRONG_GETAUXVAL or HAVE_WEAK_GETAUXVAL before using
getauxval to avoid a build failure on uclibc
Signed-off-by: Fabrice Fontaine <fontaine.fabrice@gmail.com>
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 330cb33985d0ce97c20f4a0f0bbda0fbffe098d4
Tree-SHA512: 94fbbdb0e859f0220d64b2d04565f575b410327f080125fec7fb74205d0bea0e8133561c83a696033d6dc377871133871b72c1aad19aca61e972ce67e0fdf707
6f4e3936461d0893250e7684928339f6cedf4d0c refactor: remove use of boost::algorithm::replace_first (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
As discussed in #19851 (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19851#issuecomment-685424702), this trivial PR substitutes the (only) use of `boost::algorithm::replace_first` by a direct implementation.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 6f4e3936461d0893250e7684928339f6cedf4d0c
Tree-SHA512: 2ef06498e19f864a4cbae10e8d1905e3440a2d1e8e5aae83de7597c23cdab92b4612d7fa1efbc49016e530debd127d1d50531c60ff159dbea0deaa8c836a2bfb
d9141a0002bb508b2e94e206a1bd28ef8f97ffde doc: clarify CRollingBloomFilter size estimate (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
Based on #19130, this change improves the comment for `CRollingBloomFilter` in `bloom.h`:
- Give examples to illustrate the heuristic "1.8 bytes per element per factor 0.1 of false positive rate"
- Add some Python code which can be copy/pasted for convenient filter size calculation (in an interpreter)
- Reconcile the newly added code with the existing approximation
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK d9141a0002bb508b2e94e206a1bd28ef8f97ffde
Tree-SHA512: e7138b3c531883a750ead06368975c750863fde7ef6f2633b137eca011079226e9205316217322014399fba05a48f294c788dd700bb7d479c58fe1f23e40419f
It is unnecessary to upgrade to FEATURE_HD_SPLIT if this feature is
already supported by the wallet. Because upgrading to FEATURE_HD_SPLIT
actually requires upgrading to FEATURE_PRE_SPLIT_KEYPOOL, users would
accidentally be upgraded to FEATURE_PRE_SPLIT_KEYPOOL instead of nothing
being done.
Fixes the issue described at
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20403#discussion_r526063920
fac71987281077aed7f79dce99f4eb3e8a91916a Use std::make_unique (MarcoFalke)
faaee810e62d796d66bfb2bc4e53c8b4c8104d13 build: Require C++17 compiler (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Developers have been compiling with C++17 for a few months now (fuzz tests and the msvc build have it even enabled by default). According to #16684, the 22.0 release shall be compiled with C++17 enabled.
This only sets the build flag, any other changes need more discussion and can be done later.
ACKs for top commit:
elichai:
utACK fac71987281077aed7f79dce99f4eb3e8a91916a
hebasto:
ACK fac71987281077aed7f79dce99f4eb3e8a91916a, I've locally compiled on ARM 32bit SBC without GUI.
fanquake:
ACK fac71987281077aed7f79dce99f4eb3e8a91916a
Tree-SHA512: 53eb40ba5d496376a2d2cf16e2000bef36616cc2a3696c3ec59a5366e41fa8b872817a7ca21751f030f9c1efb339dfa63cc655eaa5199b9a3d2e52c2de0ccb29
Removes the leading 0 from the version number. The minor version, which
we had been using as the major version, is now the major version. The
revision, which we had been using as the minor version, is now the minor
version. The revision number is dropped. The build number is promoted to
being part of the version number. This also avoids issues where it was
accidentally not included in the version number.
The CLIENT_VERSION remains the same format as previous as previously,
the Major version was 0 so that was never a factor in CLIENT_VERSION.
