bb6fcc75d1ec94b733d1477c816351c50be5faf9 refactor: Drop boost::thread stuff in CCheckQueue (Hennadii Stepanov)
6784ac471bb32b6bb8e2de60986f123eb4990706 bench: Use CCheckQueue local thread pool (Hennadii Stepanov)
dba30695fc42f45828db008e7e5b81cb2b5d8551 test: Use CCheckQueue local thread pool (Hennadii Stepanov)
01511776acb0c7ec216dc9c8112531067763f1cb Add local thread pool to CCheckQueue (Hennadii Stepanov)
0ef938685b5c079a6f5a98daf0e3865d718d817b refactor: Use member initializers in CCheckQueue (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR:
- gets rid of `boost::thread_group` in the `CCheckQueue` class
- allows thread safety annotation usage in the `CCheckQueue` class
- is alternative to #14464 (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18710#issuecomment-616618525, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18710#issuecomment-617291612)
Also, with this PR (I hope) it could be easier to resurrect a bunch of brilliant ideas from #9938.
Related: #17307
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK bb6fcc75d1ec94b733d1477c816351c50be5faf9
LarryRuane:
ACK bb6fcc75d1ec94b733d1477c816351c50be5faf9
jonatack:
Code review ACK bb6fcc75d1ec94b733d1477c816351c50be5faf9 and verified rebase to master builds cleanly with unit/functional tests green
Tree-SHA512: fddeb720d5a391b48bb4c6fa58ed34ccc3f57862fdb8e641745c021841c8340e35c5126338271446cbd98f40bd5484f27926aa6c3e76fa478ba1efafe72e73c1
281fd1a4a032cded7f9ea9857e3e99fc793c714b Replace KeyIDHasher with SaltedSipHasher (Andrew Chow)
210b693db66e7c5b618014b5a287aee15af00045 Add generic SaltedSipHasher (Andrew Chow)
95e61c1cf2a91d041c8025306ba36f0ea2806894 Move Hashers to util/hasher.{cpp/h} (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
There are existing `SaltedOutPointHasher` and `SaltedTxidHasher` classes used for `std::unordered_map` and `std::unordered_set` that could be useful in other places in the codebase. So we these to their own `saltedhash.{cpp/h}` file. An existing `KeyIDHasher` is moved there too. Additionally, `ScriptIDHasher`, `SaltedPubkeyHasher`, and `SaltedScriptHasher` are added so that they can be used in future work.
`KeyIDHasher` and `ScriptIDHasher` are not salted so that equality comparisons of maps and sets keyed by `CKeyID` and `CScriptID` will actually work.
Split from #19602 (and a few other PRs/branches I have).
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 281fd1a4a032cded7f9ea9857e3e99fc793c714b
jonatack:
ACK 281fd1a4a032cded7f9ea9857e3e99fc793c714b, code review, debug build and ran bitcoind after rebasing to master @ dff0f6f753ea
fjahr:
utACK 281fd1a4a032cded7f9ea9857e3e99fc793c714b
Tree-SHA512: bb03b231ccf3c9ecefc997b8da9c3770af4819f9be5b0a72997a103864e84046a2ac39b8eadf0dc9247bdccd53f86f433642e3a098882e6748341a9e7736271b
5021810650afc3073c2af6953ff046ad4d27a1fc Make CanFlushToDisk a const member function (practicalswift)
281cf995547f7683a9e9186bc6384a9fb6035d10 Do not run functions with necessary side-effects in assert() (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Do not run functions with necessary side-effects in `assert()`.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 5021810650afc3073c2af6953ff046ad4d27a1fc
sipa:
utACK 5021810650afc3073c2af6953ff046ad4d27a1fc
theStack:
Code Review ACK 5021810650afc3073c2af6953ff046ad4d27a1fc 🟢
Tree-SHA512: 38b7faccc2f16a499f9b7b1b962b49eb58580b2a2bbf63ea49dcc418a5ecc8f21a0972fa953f66db9509c7239af67cfa2f9266423fd220963d091034d7332b96
This moves the CBlockPolicyEstimator to the NodeContext, which get rids
of two globals and allows us to conditionally create the
CBlockPolicyEstimator (and to remove a circular dep).
Signed-off-by: Antoine Poinsot <darosior@protonmail.com>
Move the hashers that we use for hash tables to a common place.
Moved hashers:
- SaltedTxidHasher
- SaltedOutpointHasher
- FilterHeaderHasher
- SignatureCacheHasher
- BlockHasher
72a1d5c6f3834e206719ee5121df7727aed5b786 validation: Remove review-only comments + assertions (Carl Dong)
3756853b15902d63f4b5a3129e8b5d82e84e125b docs: Move FindFilesToPrune{,Manual} doxygen comment (Carl Dong)
485899a93c6f5fff62090907efb0ac938992e1fb style: Make FindFilesToPrune{,Manual} match style guide (Carl Dong)
3f5b5f3f6db0e5716911b3fba1460ce327e8a845 validation: Move FindFilesToPrune{,Manual} to BlockManager (Carl Dong)
f8d4975ab3fcd3553843cf0862251289c88c106b validation: Move PruneOneBlockFile to BlockManager (Carl Dong)
74f73c783d46b012f375d819e2cd09c792820cd5 validation: Pass in chainman to UnloadBlockIndex (Carl Dong)
4668ded6d6ea4299d998abbb57543f37519812e2 validation: Move ~CMainCleanup logic to ~BlockManager (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
This PR paves the way for de-globalizing `g_chainman` entirely by removing the usage of `g_chainman` in the following functions/methods:
- `~CMainCleanup`
- `CChainState::FlushStateToDisk`
- `UnloadBlockIndex`
The remaining direct uses of `g_chainman` are as follows:
1. In initialization codepaths:
- `AppTests`
- `AppInitMain`
- `TestingSetup::TestingSetup`
2. `::ChainstateActive`
3. `LookupBlockIndex`
- Note: `LookupBlockIndex` is used extensively throughout the codebase and require a much larger set of changes, therefore I've left it out of this initial PR
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 72a1d5c6f3 👚
jnewbery:
utACK 72a1d5c6f3834e206719ee5121df7727aed5b786
Tree-SHA512: 944a4fa8405eecf39706ff944375d6824373aaeea849d11473f08181eff26b12f70043a8348a5b08e6e9021b243b481842fbdfbc7c3140ca795fce3688b7f5c3
[META] No behaviour change is intended in this commit.
[META] This commit should be followed up by removing the comments and
assertions meant only to show that the change is correct.
Also stop FindFilesToPrune{,Manual} from unnecessary reaching for
::ChainActive() by passing in the necessary information.
[META] This is a pure refactor commit.
Move PruneBlockFile to BlockManager because:
1. PruneOneBlockFile only acts on BlockManager
2. Eliminates the need for callers (FindFilesToPrune{,Manual}) to have a
reference to the larger ChainstateManager, just a reference to
BlockManager is enough. See following commits.
~CMainCleanup:
1. Is vestigial
2. References the g_chainman global (we should minimize g_chainman refs)
3. Only acts on g_chainman.m_blockman
4. Does the same thing as BlockManager::Unload
ea74e10acf17903e44c85e3678853414653dd4e1 doc: Add best practice for annotating/asserting locks (Hennadii Stepanov)
2ee7743fe723227f2ea1b031eddb14fc6863f4c8 sync.h: Make runtime lock checks require compile-time lock checks (Anthony Towns)
23d71d171e6e22ba5e4a909d597a54595b2a2c1f Do not hide compile-time thread safety warnings (Hennadii Stepanov)
3ddc150857178bfb1c854c05bf9b526777876f56 Add missed thread safety annotations (Hennadii Stepanov)
af9ea55a72c94678b343f5dd98dc78f3a3ac58cb Use LockAssertion utility class instead of AssertLockHeld() (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
On the way of transit from `RecursiveMutex` to `Mutex` (see #19303) it is crucial to have run-time `AssertLockHeld()` assertion that does _not_ hide compile-time Clang Thread Safety Analysis warnings.
On master (65e4ecabd5b4252154640c7bac38c92a3f3a7018) using `AssertLockHeld()` could hide Clang Thread Safety Analysis warnings, e.g., with the following patch applied:
```diff
--- a/src/txmempool.h
+++ b/src/txmempool.h
@@ -607,7 +607,7 @@ public:
void addUnchecked(const CTxMemPoolEntry& entry, setEntries& setAncestors, bool validFeeEstimate = true) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs, cs_main);
void removeRecursive(const CTransaction& tx, MemPoolRemovalReason reason) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs);
- void removeForReorg(const CCoinsViewCache* pcoins, unsigned int nMemPoolHeight, int flags) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs, cs_main);
+ void removeForReorg(const CCoinsViewCache* pcoins, unsigned int nMemPoolHeight, int flags) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main);
void removeConflicts(const CTransaction& tx) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs);
void removeForBlock(const std::vector<CTransactionRef>& vtx, unsigned int nBlockHeight) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs);
```
Clang compiles the code without any thread safety warnings.
See "Add missed thread safety annotations" commit for the actual thread safety warnings that are fixed in this PR.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK ea74e10acf 🎙
jnewbery:
ACK ea74e10acf17903e44c85e3678853414653dd4e1
ajtowns:
ACK ea74e10acf17903e44c85e3678853414653dd4e1
Tree-SHA512: 8cba996e526751a1cb0e613c0cc1b10f027a3e9945fbfb4bd30f6355fd36b9f9c2e1e95ed3183fc254b42df7c30223278e18e5bdb5e1ef85db7fef067595d447
f19fdd47a6371dcbe0760ef6f3c3c5adb31b1bb4 test: add test for CChainState::ResizeCoinsCaches() (James O'Beirne)
8ac3ef46999ed676ca3775f7b2f461d92f09a542 add ChainstateManager::MaybeRebalanceCaches() (James O'Beirne)
f36aaa6392fdbdac6891d92202d3efeff98754f4 Add CChainState::ResizeCoinsCaches (James O'Beirne)
b223111da2e0e9ceccef75df8a20252b0094b7bc txdb: add CCoinsViewDB::ChangeCacheSize (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
This is part of the [assumeutxo project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/11):
Parent PR: #15606
Issue: #15605
Specification: https://github.com/jamesob/assumeutxo-docs/tree/master/proposal
---
In the assumeutxo implementation draft (#15056), once a UTXO snapshot is loaded, a new chainstate object is created after initialization. This means that we have to reclaim some of the cache that we've allocated to the original chainstate (per `dbcache=`) to repurpose for the snapshot chainstate.
Furthermore, it makes sense to have different cache allocations depending on which chainstate is more active. While the snapshot chainstate is working to get to the network tip (and the background validation chainstate is idle), it makes sense that the snapshot chainstate should have the majority of cache allocation. And contrariwise once the snapshot has reached network tip, most of the cache should be given to the background validation chainstate.
This set of changes (detailed in the commit messages) allows us to dynamically resize the various coins caches. None of the functionality introduced here is used at the moment, but will be in the next AU PR (which introduces `ActivateSnapshot`).
`ChainstateManager::MaybeRebalanceCaches()` defines the (somewhat normative) cache allocations between the snapshot and background validation chainstates. I'd be interested in feedback if anyone has thoughts on the proportions I've set there.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
weak utACK f19fdd47a6371dcbe0760ef6f3c3c5adb31b1bb4 -- didn't find any major problems, but not super confident that I didn't miss anything
fjahr:
Code review ACK f19fdd4
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK f19fdd47a6371dcbe0760ef6f3c3c5adb31b1bb4. Only change since last review is constructor cleanup (no change in behavior). I think the suggestions here from ajtowns and others are good, but shouldn't delay merging the PR (and hold up assumeutxo)
Tree-SHA512: fffb7847fb6993dd4a1a41cf11179b211b0b20b7eb5f7cf6266442136bfe9d43b830bbefcafd475bfd4af273f5573500594aa41fff03e0ed5c2a1e8562ff9269
Also adds CCoinsViewCache::ReallocateCache() to attempt to free
memory that the cacheCoins's allocator may be hanging onto when
downsizing the cache.
Adds `CChainState::m_coins{tip,db}_cache_size_bytes` data members
so that we can reference cache size on a per-chainstate basis for
flushing.
faec3dc2adc487af97c22408f9f0bfe33f44a230 init: Remove boost from ThreadImport (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Can be tested by calling `-reindex` or `-loadblock` and then pressing `CTRL`+`C`.
Should print something like:
```
...
2020-04-27T19:34:31Z [loadblk] Reindexing block file blk00005.dat...
^C2020-04-27T19:34:32Z [loadblk] Shutdown requested. Exit ThreadImport
2020-04-27T19:34:32Z [qt-init] Interrupting HTTP server
...
```
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK faec3dc2adc487af97c22408f9f0bfe33f44a230
hebasto:
ACK faec3dc2adc487af97c22408f9f0bfe33f44a230, tested on Linux Mint 19.3 (x86_64) both `bitcoind` and `bitcoin-qt` binaries.
Tree-SHA512: e105af18d98296d82ec99f48e478cf44577e3c32f7e4b47617a7bc7cbf71d6becb92722f229a1be38d58ad29712704509ad9740d8ab8cd3104cf90057664b437
Per BIP 141, the witness commitment structure is atleast 38 bytes,
OP_RETURN (0x6a) + 36 (0x24) + 4 byte header (0xaa21a9ed) + 32 byte
SHA256 hash. It can be longer, however any additional data has no
consensus meaning.
I'd previously attempted to create a specialized lock for ChainstateManager,
but it turns out that because that lock would be required for functions like
ChainActive() and ChainstateActive(), it created irreconcilable lock inversions
since those functions are used so broadly throughout the codebase.
Instead, I'm just using cs_main to protect the contents of g_chainman.
Co-authored-by: Russell Yanofsky <russ@yanofsky.org>
