71c3f0356c01521a95c64fba1e7375aea6286bb0 move-only: Rename index + pruning functional test (Fabian Jahr)
de08932efa953e9a237cbf879460488ad8947411 test: Update test for indices on pruned nodes (Fabian Jahr)
825d19839bf71245306d4c8edde040e5941caa46 Index: Allow coinstatsindex with pruning enabled (Fabian Jahr)
f08c9fb0c6a799e3cb75ca5f763a746471625beb Index: Use prune locks for blockfilterindex (Fabian Jahr)
2561823531c25e1510c107eb41de944b00444ce0 blockstorage: Add prune locks to BlockManager (Fabian Jahr)
231fc7b035481f748159968353c1cab81354e843 refactor: Introduce GetFirstStoredBlock helper function (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
# Motivation
The main motivation of this change and only behavior change noticeable by user is to allow running `coinstatsindex` on pruned nodes as has been requested [here for example](https://twitter.com/benthecarman/status/1388170854140452870?s=20).
# Background
`coinstatsindex` on pruned nodes can be enabled in a much simpler than it is done here but it comes with downside. The ability to run `blockfilterindex`on pruned nodes was added in #15946 but it also added the `blockfilterindex` as a dependency to `validation` and it introduced two new circular dependencies. Enabling `coinstatsindex` on pruned nodes in a similar way would add it as a dependency as well and introduce another circular dependency.
Instead, this PR introduces a `m_prune_blockers` map to `BlockManager` as a flexible approach to block pruning. Entities like `blockfilterindex`, for example, can add a key and a height to block pruning over that height. These entities need to update that value to allow more pruning when they are ready.
# Alternative approach
Upon completing the first draft of this PR I found #19463 as an alternative that follows the same but follows a very different approach. I am listing the main differences here as I see them:
- Usage of globals
- Blocks pruning with a start and a stop height
- Can persist blockers across restarts
- Blockers can be set/unset via RPCs
Personally, I don't think any of these are necessary to be added here but if the general approach or specific features are more appealing to reviewers I am happy to change to a solution based on that PR or port over specific parts of it here.
ACKs for top commit:
mzumsande:
Code review ACK 71c3f0356c01521a95c64fba1e7375aea6286bb0
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 71c3f0356c01521a95c64fba1e7375aea6286bb0. Changes since last review: just tweaking comments and asserts, and rebasing
w0xlt:
tACK 71c3f0356c on signet.
Tree-SHA512: de7efda08b44aa31013fbebc47a02cd2de32db170b570f9643e1f013fee0e8e7ca3068952d1acc6e5e74a70910735c5f263437981ad73df841ad945b52d36b71
fa870e3d4ccd6dfd0a9a8f2c608721a7251114e2 Remove not needed clang-format off comments (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
It seems odd to disable clang-format and force manual formatting when there is no need for it. So remove the clang-format comments and other unneeded comments.
Can be reviewed with `--word-diff-regex=. --ignore-all-space`
Looks like this was initially added in commit d9d79576f423cd9c5cef4547c7e3648dbb339460 to accommodate a linter that has since been removed and replaced by a functional test.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK fa870e3d4ccd6dfd0a9a8f2c608721a7251114e2
fanquake:
ACK fa870e3d4ccd6dfd0a9a8f2c608721a7251114e2
Tree-SHA512: 0f8f97c12f5dbe517dd96c10b10ce1b8772d8daed33e6b41f73ea1040e89888cf3b8c0ad7b20319e366fe30c71e8b181c89098ae7f6a3deb8647e1b4731db815
a62e84438d27ee6213219fe2c233e58814fcbb5d fuzz: add `SplitString` fuzz target (MarcoFalke)
4fad7e46d94a0fdee4ff917e81360d7ae6bd8110 test: add unit tests for `SplitString` helper (Kiminuo)
9cc8e876e412056ed22d364538f0da3d5d71946d refactor: introduce single-separator split helper `SplitString` (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR adds a simple string split helper `SplitString` that takes use of the spanparsing `Split` function that was first introduced in #13697 (commit fe8a7dcd78cfeedc9a7c705e91384f793822912b). This enables to replace most calls to `boost::split`, in the cases where only a single separator character is used. Note that while previous attempts to replace `boost::split` were controversial (e.g. #13751), this one has a trivial implementation: it merely uses an internal helper (that is unit tested and in regular use with output descriptiors) and converts its result from spans to strings. As a drawback though, not all `boost::split` instances can be tackled.
As a possible optimization, one could return a vector of `std::string_view`s (available since C++17) instead of strings, to avoid copies. This would need more carefulness on the caller sites though, to avoid potential lifetime issues, and it's probably not worth it, considering that none of the places where strings are split are really performance-critical.
ACKs for top commit:
martinus:
Code review ACK a62e84438d27ee6213219fe2c233e58814fcbb5d. Ran all tests. I also like that with `boost::split` it was not obvious that the resulting container was cleared, and with `SplitString` API that's obvious.
Tree-SHA512: 10cb22619ebe46831b1f8e83584a89381a036b54c88701484ac00743e2a62cfe52c9f3ecdbb2d0815e536c99034558277cc263600ec3f3588b291c07eef8ed24
ee02c8bd9aedad8cfd3c2618035fe275da025fb9 util/check: Add CHECK_NONFATAL identity function, NONFATAL_UNREACHABLE AND UNREACHABLE macros (Aurèle Oulès)
Pull request description:
This PR replaces the macro `CHECK_NONFATAL` with an identity function.
I simplified the usage of `CHECK_NONFATAL` where applicable in `src/rpc`.
This function is useful in sanity checks for RPC and command-line interfaces.
Context: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24804#discussion_r846182474.
Also adds `UNREACHABLE_NONFATAL` macro.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK ee02c8bd9aedad8cfd3c2618035fe275da025fb9
MarcoFalke:
ACK ee02c8bd9aedad8cfd3c2618035fe275da025fb9 🍨
Tree-SHA512: 3cba09223cd7b22e62fe5d0b46c4a024c1d9957d4268ba6d3fb07fcc0a5854fc0886bb3266184e6a7df5df91373b3e84edd6adf6999c4e934aeef8c043b01aa2
3ae7791bcaa88f5c68592673b8926ee807242ce7 refactor: use Span in random.* (pasta)
Pull request description:
~This PR does two things~
1. use a Span<unsigned char> for GetRandBytes and GetStrongRandBytes
~2. make GetRand a template for which any integral type can be used, where the default behavior is to return a random integral up to the max of the integral unless a max is provided.
This simplifies a lot of code from `GetRand(std::numeric_limits<uint64_t>::max()` -> `GetRand<uint64_t>()`~
MarcoFalke this was inspired by your comment here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24185#issuecomment-1025514263 about using Span, so hopefully I'll be able to get this PR done and merged 😂
~Also, if requested I could revert the `GetRand(std::numeric_limits<uint64_t>::max()` -> `GetRand<uint64_t>()` related changes if it ends up causing too many conflicts~
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Thank you! Code review re-ACK 3ae7791bcaa88f5c68592673b8926ee807242ce7
Tree-SHA512: 12375a83b68b288916ba0de81cfcab4aac14389a66a36811ae850427435eb67dd55e47df9ac3ec47db4e214f4330139e548bec815fff8a3f571484ea558dca79
This helper uses spanparsing::Split internally and enables to replace
all calls to boost::split where only a single separator is passed.
Co-authored-by: Martin Ankerl <Martin.Ankerl@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com>
cccc4e879a8cb9d858a88ea46b28ea27ab79ca55 Remove nHeightEnd and nHeight in generateBlocks helper (MarcoFalke)
fa38b1c8bd29e2c792737f6481ab928e46396b7e Remove buggy and confusing IncrementExtraNonce (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
IncrementExtraNonce has many issues:
* It is test-only code, but part of bitcoind
* It is using the block height of the tip, as opposed to the block's previous block as reference for the new height. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/24730#issuecomment-1085586193
* It has no use case in regtest testing. With a low difficulty the extra nonce won't be incremented. With a high difficulty the test-only functions are clumsy to handle anyway. For example, the generate* RPCs will return an empty array once they reached `maxtries`, as opposed to an error. Also the calls can't be aborted early unless the node shuts down completely. So I think it is fine to just remove the extra nonce functionality and leave it to the outside to implement, if needed. For example, a wrapper script can call the `generate*` RPCs once every second, to use the timestamp as extra nonce.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK cccc4e879a8cb9d858a88ea46b28ea27ab79ca55
Tree-SHA512: d8a3989ad280ebd4b1b574159b3a396b8a42134347e6be3c88445162d86624d221c416456f45ae75aea62ed8c8a1a9bb3a2532924abca2ef7a879cb8e6b15654
The removed code was intended to catch issues with event_enable_debug_logging which was not available prior to libevent 2.1.1. This is not necessary since the minimum libevent version was bumped to 2.1.8.
71038a151e3136c22449e1a5cb1f386e8474c32d rpc: Fix documentation assertion for `getrawtransaction` (laanwj)
Pull request description:
When `getrawtransaction` is successfully used on a coinbase transaction, there is an assertion error. This is very unlikely but happens in the `interface_usdt_utxocache.py` test in #24358.
This does the following:
- Add missing "coinbase" documentation.
- Synchronize documentation between `getrawtransaction` and `decoderawtransaction`, the two users of `TxToUniv` that have detailed documentation. `decodepsbt` and `getblock` also uses it but fortunately elides this block.
- Change "vout[].amount" to `STR_AMOUNT` for consistency.
- Add maintainer comment to keep the two places synchronized. It might be possible to get smarter with deduplication, but there are some extra fields that prevent the obvious way.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 71038a151e3136c22449e1a5cb1f386e8474c32d
Tree-SHA512: 962236130455d805190ff9a5c971e4e25c17db35614a90ce340264ec953b0ad7fb814eb33ae430b5073955a8a350f72bdd67ba93e35f9c70e5175b836a767a35
When `getrawtransaction` is successfully used on a coinbase transaction,
there is an assertion error. This is very unlikely but happens in the
test in #24358.
This does the following:
- Add missing "coinbase" documentation.
- Synchronize documentation between `getrawtransaction` and
`decoderawtransaction`, the two users of `TxToUniv` that have detailed
documentation. `decodepsbt` also uses it but fortunately elides this block.
- Change "vout[].amount" to `STR_AMOUNT` for consistency.
- Add maintainer comment to keep the two places synchronized. It might
be possible to get smarter with deduplication, but there are some
extra fields that prevent the obvious way.
bb84b7145b31dbfdcb4cf0b9b6e612a57e573993 add tests for no recipient and using send_max while inputs are specified (ishaanam)
49090ec4025152c847be8a5ab6aa6f379e345260 Add sendall RPC née sweep (Murch)
902793c7772e5bdd5aae5b0d20a32c02a1a6dc7c Extract FinishTransaction from send() (Murch)
6d2208a3f6849a3732af6ff010eeea629b9b10d0 Extract interpretation of fee estimation arguments (Murch)
a31d75e5fb5c1304445d698595079e29f3cd3a3a Elaborate error messages for outdated options (Murch)
35ed094e4b0e0554e609709f6ca1f7d17096882c Extract prevention of outdated option names (Murch)
Pull request description:
Add sendall RPC née sweep
_Motivation_
Currently, the wallet uses a fSubtractFeeAmount (SFFO) flag on the
recipients objects for all forms of sending calls. According to the
commit discussion, this flag was chiefly introduced to permit sweeping
without manually calculating the fees of transactions. However, the flag
leads to unintuitive behavior and makes it more complicated to test
many wallet RPCs exhaustively. We proposed to introduce a dedicated
`sendall` RPC with the intention to cover this functionality.
Since the proposal, it was discovered in further discussion that our
proposed `sendall` rpc and SFFO have subtly different scopes of
operation.
• sendall:
Use _given UTXOs_ to pay a destination the remainder after fees.
• SFFO:
Use a _given budget_ to pay an address the remainder after fees.
While `sendall` will simplify cases of spending a given set of
UTXOs such as paying the value from one or more specific UTXOs, emptying
a wallet, or burning dust, we realized that there are some cases in
which SFFO is used to pay other parties from a limited budget,
which can often lead to the creation of change outputs. This cannot be
easily replicated using `sendall` as it would require manual
computation of the appropriate change amount.
As such, sendall cannot replace all uses of SFFO, but it still has a
different use case and will aid in simplifying some wallet calls and
numerous wallet tests.
_Sendall call details_
The proposed sendall call builds a transaction from a specific
subset of the wallet's UTXO pool (by default all of them) and assigns
the funds to one or more receivers. Receivers can either be specified
with a given amount or receive an equal share of the remaining
unassigned funds. At least one recipient must be provided without
assigned amount to collect the remainder. The `sendall` call will
never create change. The call has a `send_max` option that changes the
default behavior of spending all UTXOs ("no UTXO left behind"), to
maximizing the output amount of the transaction by skipping uneconomic
UTXOs. The `send_max` option is incompatible with providing a specific
set of inputs.
---
Edit: Replaced OP with latest commit message to reflect my updated motivation of the proposal.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK bb84b7145b31dbfdcb4cf0b9b6e612a57e573993
Tree-SHA512: 20aaf75d268cb4b144f5d6437d33ec7b5f989256b3daeeb768ae1e7f39dc6b962af8223c5cb42ecc72dc38cecd921c53c077bc0ec300b994e902412213dd2cc3
_Motivation_
Currently, the wallet uses a fSubtractFeeAmount (SFFO) flag on the
recipients objects for all forms of sending calls. According to the
commit discussion, this flag was chiefly introduced to permit sweeping
without manually calculating the fees of transactions. However, the flag
leads to unintuitive behavior and makes it more complicated to test
many wallet RPCs exhaustively. We proposed to introduce a dedicated
`sendall` RPC with the intention to cover this functionality.
Since the proposal, it was discovered in further discussion that our
proposed `sendall` rpc and SFFO have subtly different scopes of
operation.
• sendall:
Use _specific UTXOs_ to pay a destination the remainder after fees.
• SFFO:
Use a _specific budget_ to pay an address the remainder after fees.
While `sendall` will simplify cases of spending from specific UTXOs,
emptying a wallet, or burning dust, we realized that there are some
cases in which SFFO is used to pay other parties from a limited budget,
which can often lead to the creation of change outputs. This cannot be
easily replicated using `sendall` as it would require manual computation
of the appropriate change amount.
As such, sendall cannot replace all uses of SFFO, but it still has a
different use case and will aid in simplifying some wallet calls and
numerous wallet tests.
_Sendall call details_
The proposed sendall call builds a transaction from a specific subset of
the wallet's UTXO pool (by default all of them) and assigns the funds to
one or more receivers. Receivers can either be specified with a specific
amount or receive an equal share of the remaining unassigned funds. At
least one recipient must be provided without assigned amount to collect
the remainder. The `sendall` call will never create change. The call has
a `send_max` option that changes the default behavior of spending all
UTXOs ("no UTXO left behind"), to maximizing the output amount of the
transaction by skipping uneconomic UTXOs. The `send_max` option is
incompatible with providing a specific set of inputs.
fc892c3a80091fbeaa2b5a6ec5bdaa31359b42de rpc: Fail to return undocumented or misdocumented JSON (MarcoFalke)
f4bc4a705addea3e60c3b69437913e6571df275d rpc: Add m_skip_type_check to RPCResult (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This avoids documentation shortcomings such as the ones fixed in commit e7b6272b305386a264adf2c04b7bebfb8499070f, 138d55e6a0241f126916fde6ac9177c7e2a119c4, 577bd51a4b8de066466a445192c1c653872657e2, f8c84e047c61200fae4cc1d85688e113bf270409, 0ee9a00f90e81a6978b30bdb250a37cbfa6da022, 13f41855c5fedf11d4a2525f2f0dd214533e5e62, or faecb2ee0a0ad3eb8303cfc84a87dc02ec553c43
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK fc892c3a80091fbeaa2b5a6ec5bdaa31359b42de - tested that this catches issue, i.e #24691:
Tree-SHA512: 9d0d7e6291bfc6f67541a4ff746d374ad8751fefcff6d103d8621c0298b190ab1d209ce96cfc3a0d4a6a5460a9f9bb790eb96027b16e5ff91f2512e40c92ca84
fac5a51c47fba21678fb35805e40d00fe7c891a0 Move mempool RPCs to rpc/mempool (MarcoFalke)
fa0f666dd7b55a5a0250c5e35d2c3dfd565463b7 style: Add static keyword where possible in rpc/mempool (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This moves the remaining mempool RPCs to `rpc/mempool`. Previously all mempool RPCs from the `blockchain` category have been moved. This patch moves the ones from the `rawtransactions` category.
In the future, as a follow-up to this refactoring patch, it could be considered whether a new `mempool` category should be introduced.
Beside a clearer code organization, this pull request should also reduce the compile time and space of the `rawtransactions.cpp` file.
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
Code review ACK fac5a51c47fba21678fb35805e40d00fe7c891a0.
Tree-SHA512: 5578b894b68d0595869a9b03ed8dceebe3366f73dec5f090ccc36ff4002b1bc4d58af77546c2d71537c1be03694d9a28c4b1bfbb3569560997879293c5c0301e
1066d10f71e6800c78012d789ff6ae19df0243fe scripted-diff: rename TxRelay members (John Newbery)
575bbd0dea6d12510fdf3220d0f0e47d969da6e9 [net processing] Move tx relay data to Peer (John Newbery)
785f55f7eeab0dedbeb8e0d0b459f3bdc538b621 [net processing] Move m_wtxid_relay to Peer (John Newbery)
36346703f8558d6781c079c29ddece5a97477beb [net] Add CNode.m_relays_txs and CNode.m_bloom_filter_loaded (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
This continues the work of moving application layer data into net_processing, by moving all tx data into the new Peer object added in #19607.
For motivation, see #19398.
ACKs for top commit:
dergoegge:
ACK 1066d10f71e6800c78012d789ff6ae19df0243fe - This is a good layer separation improvement with no behavior changes.
glozow:
utACK 1066d10f71e6800c78012d789ff6ae19df0243fe
Tree-SHA512: 0c9d6b8a0a05e2d816b6d6588b7df133842ec960ae67667813422aa7bd8eb5308599c714f3822a98ddbdf364ffab9050b055079277ba4aff24092557ff99ebcc
faf37c217a408114224f91b7ada3fb6ff29b0c0a rpc: Exclude descriptor when address is excluded (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
I don't think output descriptors should be used to describe redeem scripts and witness scripts.
Fix this by excluding them when it doesn't make sense.
This should only affect the `decodepsbt` RPC.
Found by https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23083
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK faf37c217a408114224f91b7ada3fb6ff29b0c0a
jonatack:
ACK faf37c217a408114224f91b7ada3fb6ff29b0c0a
Tree-SHA512: ebd581ad639e70080e26028723fed287caa3fa4d7b836936645020d6cd9b7586585d7113b043442c444a9dc90c23b93efd7f8b8a7d6cf5db1e42137b67c497c3
fa2d176016683eac82dabfbfc276b8a7b07b7499 Move txoutproof RPCs to txoutproof.cpp (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The txoutproof RPCs don't really fit into `rawtransaction.cpp`, as they deal with txids, not with raw transactions. As they are placed in the `blockchain` RPC category, they could be moved there. However, `blockchain.cpp` already takes about 20 seconds to compile (and `rawtransaction.cpp` even longer), so move them to a separate file.
Can be reviewed with `--color-moved=dimmed-zebra --color-moved-ws=ignore-all-space`.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK fa2d176016683eac82dabfbfc276b8a7b07b7499
theStack:
Concept and code-review ACK fa2d176016683eac82dabfbfc276b8a7b07b7499
Tree-SHA512: 6250e5f87b6237f604d69643f9a809b238702d73f041792c537aeadeafdb60ab8e0dca1d83347d0d6c85900ce179df14365ae303ca3930ed33a528a862f85aa3
facd5d92e185cde608289462b400b19bba2b901c doc: Fix getblockchaininfo/getdeploymentinfo RPC docs (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Also, fix whitespace to be `4` spaces. Can be reviewed with `--ignore-all-space --word-diff-regex=.`.
Found by https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23083
ACKs for top commit:
luke-jr:
crACK facd5d92e185cde608289462b400b19bba2b901c
Tree-SHA512: 113228a6b140009cecd9068fb634d352148670589f647350e41c02a35e0ca306b4a2d3f2588cd9ef14a2ab7d1f23d0d2f83b5ebb00b60f17a1d16a8d71386fd2
f865cf8ded2b2fbc82a6fbc41226d991909a6880 Add and use BlockManager::GetAllBlockIndices (Carl Dong)
28ba0313eac37e4a900b7e97af7169ce999c4024 Add and use CBlockIndexHeightOnlyComparator (Carl Dong)
12eb05df63f930969115af6dc66e2e5d02f2a517 move-only: Move CBlockIndexWorkComparator to blockstorage (Carl Dong)
c600ee38168a460d3026eae0e289c976194aad14 Only load BlockMan in BlockMan member functions (Carl Dong)
42e56d9b188f97c077ed2269e24acc0be35ece17 style-only: No need for std::pair for vSortedByHeight (Carl Dong)
3bbb6fea051f4e19bd2448e401a6c4e9b4cc7a41 style-only: Various blockstorage.cpp cleanups (Carl Dong)
5be9ee3c54dcb396ff52fc8c8b7e4e6e39ec4a3b refactor: more const annotations for uses of CBlockIndex* (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
The only important commit is "Only load BlockMan in BlockMan member functions", everything else is all just small style changes.
Here's the commit message, reproduced:
```
This commit effectively splits the "load block index itself" logic from
"derive Chainstate variables from loaded block index" logic.
This means that BlockManager::LoadBlockIndex{,DB} will only load what's
relevant to the BlockManager.
```
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK f865cf8ded2b2fbc82a6fbc41226d991909a6880 ; code review only
MarcoFalke:
review ACK f865cf8ded2b2fbc82a6fbc41226d991909a6880 🗂
Tree-SHA512: 7b204d782834e06fd7329d022e2ae860181b4e8105c33bfb928539a4ec24161dc7438a9c4d4ee279dcad77de310c160b997bb8aa18923243d0fd55ccf4ad7c3a
fad4c8934c7b4342076bd01daa4abf4d83617b17 Add RegisterMempoolRPCCommands helper (MarcoFalke)
fafd40b5413aea5f8ec47c24fdb2ccc702e7cdd7 refactor: Avoid int64_t -> size_t -> int64_t conversion (MarcoFalke)
fa2a5f301aa678aa7b6be4bb7987f2bcbdaf2be2 rpc: Move mempool RPCs to new file (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The `blockchain.cpp` file is quite large. This makes it harder to navigate and increases the memory required to compile.
Improve on both issues by splitting up the mempool RPCs to a separate file.
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
Code review ACK fad4c8934c7b4342076bd01daa4abf4d83617b17.
theStack:
Code-review ACK fad4c8934c7b4342076bd01daa4abf4d83617b17 🏞️
Tree-SHA512: 7f13168ea2cbea51eaef05ca1604fddc919480a2128ec7fa6b1f9365ec5e4822c3df93eb408a19f038c627f2309fa282b9f7f7ec45e5e661fc728f6b33157f89
