This ensures that all gui translator comments end in a full stop.
If a comment does not end in a full stop, a translator may think
that the rest of the comment is being cut off.
While here, add a colon to the word "see" for any comments
touched which point to look at a link.
4830f4912a538600e9e9133442e9f8d929006630 qt: Refactor open date range to use std::optional (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Use `std::nullopt` for open date range instead of `TransactionFilterProxy::MIN_DATE` and `TransactionFilterProxy::MAX_DATE`.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
re-ACK 4830f4912a538600e9e9133442e9f8d929006630, only missed header included since my [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/354#pullrequestreview-682108182) review.
Talkless:
tACK 4830f4912a538600e9e9133442e9f8d929006630, tested on Debian Sid, filtering seems to work as expected.
Tree-SHA512: dcecbcc129cb401d6ac13a20f015b8cb2a7434fae6bd3e5b19fca5531e8bd915e2a0835f9c601371381750cdc8cd6fcf4f8c6669177d679773046cbe13bed68b
c231254a65d390a3350fcef456d57e4a6eca0506 qt: Make TransactionView aware of runtime palette change (Hennadii Stepanov)
2b622d4aced1848393989ee906b1f9d2436f1c1a qt: Make CoinControlDialog aware of runtime palette change (Hennadii Stepanov)
97a6b5e06a532a4ee029c8ba59c3438369f8b049 qt: Make OverviewPage aware of runtime palette change (Hennadii Stepanov)
d05f1b278d9846de5142a4ac3f53c84145330dd1 qt: Make UnitDisplayStatusBarControl aware of runtime palette change (Hennadii Stepanov)
6b2ce65392dc98250e84941370e975048b8afc54 qt: Replace base class of ClickableLabel with ThemedLabel (Hennadii Stepanov)
ff530a2093c294a1093e1b00fb66ab0a98851c04 qt: Use GUIUtil::ThemedLabel class (Hennadii Stepanov)
d99ef327a885874fed1c4e35e0f47b10290c6bd9 qt: Add GUIUtil::ThemedLabel class (Hennadii Stepanov)
c054720e08b5549913f54b9b4bc4e4002617ff23 qt: Make SignVerifyMessageDialog aware of runtime palette change (Hennadii Stepanov)
0dcc3fac433b341eb6e1d3a2fb4d2de1595e8e88 qt: Make SendCoinsEntry aware of runtime palette change (Hennadii Stepanov)
fa18d28e1242c2948814df1082ee12c2fecf5403 qt: Make RPCConsole aware of runtime palette change (Hennadii Stepanov)
f1083826e3e68803da86af6efba21c4080769b5c qt: Make BitcoinGUI aware of runtime palette change (Hennadii Stepanov)
ce17861dc419b0d1fc1d933000f484dd08bacf5b qt: Make PlatformStyle aware of runtime palette change (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
On macOS switching appearance (Light -> Dark or Dark -> Light) when Bitcoin Core is running makes the GUI pretty unusable.
This bug is especially important when a user chose the "Auto" mode to adjust appearance automatically.
This PR fixes Bitcoin Core behavior.
This is an alternative to #268.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
tACK c231254a65d390a3350fcef456d57e4a6eca0506 on macOS 11.4
goums:
ACK c231254a65d390a3350fcef456d57e4a6eca0506
promag:
Tested ACK c231254a65d390a3350fcef456d57e4a6eca0506 on macOS Big Sur arm64.
jarolrod:
tACK c231254a65d390a3350fcef456d57e4a6eca0506
Tree-SHA512: 122dda3e4c9703f68cec60613c536ca59d04c93f2c03398559f2361b8d279ae534800e8e677d94a33e10e769d00be54295a704e98afa2e986a06146b9f164854
cdbc2bd1f1c171848c1fef7f217afe140e1afb06 qt: Use template function qOverload in signal-slot connections (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
A nice template function [`qOverload`](https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qtglobal.html#qOverload) is available for us now (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20413, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21286).
Its usage makes code much more readable.
This PR does not change behavior.
ACKs for top commit:
Talkless:
utACK cdbc2bd1f1c171848c1fef7f217afe140e1afb06.
promag:
Code review ACK cdbc2bd1f1c171848c1fef7f217afe140e1afb06.
Tree-SHA512: 72002aa646b1a79bab62d498825b3f245dc7ebdc189280f8bd3b4076e1bb50be8802c02bc872ff6f70c1ea81faec66d3bec36471119dd98c9e70d87b990396ae
88df300f20da02060694cfe643e1c882efaa306c qt: Do not translate file extensions (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
File extensions are untranslatable by their nature.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Concept and code review ACK 88df300f20da02060694cfe643e1c882efaa306c
Talkless:
tACK 88df300f20da02060694cfe643e1c882efaa306c, tested on Debian Sid with Qt 5.15.2. Tested all filters except for .psbt.
jarolrod:
re-ACK 88df300f20da02060694cfe643e1c882efaa306c
Tree-SHA512: 104d383543edcee8fb825f98d3b6669a7aaae2c74b6602f9bc407bf1c88be121ec535f2f9be87afa6ca775dc79865165f620553f6f6ab1d31a3f9ea93f7f9593
8f9644890a167a093d95ecef1f12a20dce1bc581 qt: Remove Transactionview Edit Label Action (Jarol Rodriguez)
Pull request description:
This PR removes the `Edit Label` action from the `transactionview` context menu. Since the `Edit Label` action will no longer be utilized in the `transactionview`, the `Edit Label` function logic is also removed.
| Master | PR |
| ----------- | ----------- |
|<img width="248" alt="Screen Shot 2021-02-17 at 8 34 34 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/23396902/108292189-9b86c800-7161-11eb-9e80-6238523bc27e.png">|<img width="248" alt="Screen Shot 2021-02-17 at 8 35 10 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/23396902/108292204-a17ca900-7161-11eb-8582-7f33d3e2ba8f.png">|
Among the context menu actions for each transaction in the `transactionview` is the `Edit Label` action.
While all other actions apply directly to the selected transaction, the `Edit Label` action applies to the selected transaction's address. As documented in issue #209 and [#1168](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/1168) , this is an "unfortunate" placement for such an action. The current placement creates a confusing UX scenario where the outcome of the action is ambiguous.
**Example of Ambiguous Behavior:**
The context menu gives the wrong impression that the `Edit Label` action will edit a `Label` for the specific transaction that has been right-clicked on. This impression can be because all other actions in this menu will relate to the specific transaction and the misconception between `Comment` and `Label`.
<img width="1062" alt="editlabel-start" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/23396902/108296385-6da48200-7167-11eb-89f0-b21ccc58f6f4.png">
Let's say I wanted to give the transaction selected in the screenshot above a comment of "2-17[17:43]". Given all the context clues, it will be reasonable to assume that the `Edit Label` function will give a label to this transaction. Instead, it edits the `Label` for the address behind this transaction. Thus, changing the `Label` for all transactions associated with this address.
<img width="971" alt="editlabel-end" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/23396902/108297179-e35d1d80-7168-11eb-86a9-0d2796c51829.png">
**Maintaining `Edit Label` Functionality:**
The action of Editing a Label should instead be reserved for the respective address tables of the `Send` and `Receive` tabs. As documented in this [comment](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/issues/209#issuecomment-780922101), `Edit Label` is currently implemented in the `Send` tab and is missing in the `Receive` tab. A follow-up PR can add the `Edit Label` functionality to the `Receive` tab.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 8f9644890a167a093d95ecef1f12a20dce1bc581
Talkless:
tACK 8f9644890a167a093d95ecef1f12a20dce1bc581, tested on Debian Sid.
Tree-SHA512: 70bbcc8be3364b0d4f476a9760aa14ad1ad1f53b0b130ce0ffe75190d76c386e6e26c530c0a55d1742402fe2b45c68a2af6dbfaf58ee9909ad93b06f0b6559d4
Among the context menu actions for each transaction in the transactionview is the 'Edit Label' action.
While all other actions apply directly to the selected transaction, the 'Edit Label' action applies to the address of the selected transaction. This creates a confusing UX scenario where the outcome of the action is ambiguous. The action of Editing a Label should instead be reserved for the Send and Receive tabs.
This PR removes the 'Edit Label' action from the transactionview context menu. Since the 'Edit Label' action will no longer be utilized in the transactionview, the 'Edit Label' function logic is also removed.
In Qt 5 the last column resizing with dragging its left edge works
out-of-the-box.
The current TableViewLastColumnResizingFixer implementation could put
the last column content out of the view port and confuse a user.
d795c610d3 [qt] TransactionView: highlight replacement tx after fee bump (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
Consistent with #12421 which highlights the transaction after send.
<img width="747" alt="1" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10217/38036280-a7358ea4-32a6-11e8-8f92-417e9e1e3e8b.png">
<img width="685" alt="2" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10217/38036289-aac87040-32a6-11e8-9f94-81745ff6c592.png">
~I'm not too proud of the `QTimer::singleShot(10` bit; any suggestions on how to properly wait for the transactions table to become aware of the new transaction?~
Although I could have called `focusTransaction()` directly from `TransactionView::bumpFee()` I'm using the same signal as the send screen. This should make it easier to move fee bump / transaction replacement functionality around later.
Tree-SHA512: 242055b7c3d32c7b2cf871f5ceda2581221902fd53fa29e0b092713fc16d3191adbe8cbb28417d522dda9febec8cc05e07afe3489cd7caaecd33460c1dde6fbc
9ad6746ccd Use static_cast instead of C-style casts for non-fundamental types (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
A C-style cast is equivalent to try casting in the following order:
1. `const_cast(...)`
2. `static_cast(...)`
3. `const_cast(static_cast(...))`
4. `reinterpret_cast(...)`
5. `const_cast(reinterpret_cast(...))`
By using `static_cast<T>(...)` explicitly we avoid the possibility of an unintentional and dangerous `reinterpret_cast`. Furthermore `static_cast<T>(...)` allows for easier grepping of casts.
For a more thorough discussion, see ["ES.49: If you must use a cast, use a named cast"](https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#es49-if-you-must-use-a-cast-use-a-named-cast) in the C++ Core Guidelines (Stroustrup & Sutter).
Tree-SHA512: bd6349b7ea157da93a47b8cf238932af5dff84731374ccfd69b9f732fabdad1f9b1cdfca67497040f14eaa85346391404f4c0495e22c467f26ca883cd2de4d3c
6dda059bd [qt] Simplifies boolean expression model && model->haveWatchOnly() (251)
Pull request description:
This PR optimizes the boolean expression `model && model->haveWatchOnly()` to `model->haveWatchOnly()`.
The boolean expression can be optimized because the method `TransactionView::exportClicked` already guards against a potential dereferenced null pointer by returning early if `model` is null.
63a4dc1087/src/qt/transactionview.cpp (L351-L353)
Tree-SHA512: 8bdd0d05bf879745fa39d3ca7524471720ae08ceee9427d5a08776e7b56d18542ae87a6991cd6779e232305f504fdfc77223702b72ecbe231f5f5e98453456dd
The boolean expression model && model->haveWatchOnly() can be simplified to model->haveWatchOnly(), because if (!model || !model->getOptionsModel()) { return; } guards against a potential dereferenced null pointer.
