fadd568931a2d21e0f80e1efaf2281f5164fa20e fuzz: Fix misplaced SeedRand::ZEROS (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
After commit fae63bf13033adec80c7e6d73144a21ea3cfbc6d this must be placed even before test_setup. This is nice, because it makes the usage consistently appear in the first line.
The change is moving a `SeedRandomForTest(SeedRand::ZEROS)` to happen earlier. This is fine, because it will either have no effect, or make the code more deterministic, because after commit fae63bf, no other re-seeding other than `ZEROS` can happen in fuzz tests.
ACKs for top commit:
marcofleon:
Re ACK fadd568931a2d21e0f80e1efaf2281f5164fa20e
brunoerg:
code review ACK fadd568931a2d21e0f80e1efaf2281f5164fa20e
hodlinator:
ACK fadd568931a2d21e0f80e1efaf2281f5164fa20e
Tree-SHA512: 54eadf19a1e850157a280fb252ece8797f37a9a50d3b0a01aa2c267bacbe8ef4ddea6cf3faadcbaa4ab9f53148edf08e3cee5dfb3eae928db582adf8373a5206
81cea5d4ee0e226f7c7145072de85829f4166ec9 Ensure m_tip_block is never ZERO (Sjors Provoost)
e058544d0e83aed691903d13d7e5775beb7e678f Make m_tip_block an std::optional (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
Suggested in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31297#discussion_r1844244309
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
re-ACK 81cea5d4ee0e226f7c7145072de85829f4166ec9
tdb3:
code review re ACK 81cea5d4ee0e226f7c7145072de85829f4166ec9
l0rinc:
ACK 81cea5d4ee0e226f7c7145072de85829f4166ec9
Tree-SHA512: 31a75ba29e3d567bab32e4e7925a419d9d7a4d2d85ed1c1012116d8d22adc14d31d5b4ce5f6c499c994188dcd26a01cced05be74f94c892fc90ae17a6783a472
fae63bf13033adec80c7e6d73144a21ea3cfbc6d fuzz: Clarify that only SeedRandomStateForTest(SeedRand::ZEROS) is allowed (MarcoFalke)
fa18acb457e91cc0fa6b3640b6b55c6bc61572ee fuzz: Abort when using global PRNG without re-seed (MarcoFalke)
fa7809aeab838752af94c52977936a8c6555d315 fuzz: Add missing SeedRandomStateForTest(SeedRand::ZEROS) (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This is the first step toward improving fuzz stability and determinism (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29018).
A fuzz target using the global test-only PRNG will now abort if the seed is re-used across fuzz inputs.
Also, temporarily add `SeedRandomStateForTest(SeedRand::ZEROS)` to all affected fuzz targets. This may slow down the libfuzzer leak detector, but it will disable itself after some time, or it can be disabled explicitly with `-detect_leaks=0`.
In a follow-up, each affected fuzz target can be stripped of the global random use and a local `RandomMixin` (or similar) can be added instead.
(Can be tested by removing any one of the re-seed calls and observing a fuzz abort)
ACKs for top commit:
hodlinator:
ACK fae63bf13033adec80c7e6d73144a21ea3cfbc6d
dergoegge:
utACK fae63bf13033adec80c7e6d73144a21ea3cfbc6d
marcofleon:
Tested ACK fae63bf13033adec80c7e6d73144a21ea3cfbc6d
Tree-SHA512: 4a0db69af7f715408edf4f8b08b44f34ce12ee2c79d33b336ad19a6e6bd079c4ff7c971af0a3efa428213407c1171f4e2837ec6a2577086c2f94cd15618a0892
f86678156a3d3ce6488b383a2d6d91d28fcd2b73 Check leaves size maximum in MerkleComputation (Sjors Provoost)
4d572882463b20818fcfbd0a2f6fa6c0168e4e4a refactor: use CTransactionRef in submitSolution (Sjors Provoost)
2e81791d907288c174aa05dc1b3816e6d988127c Drop TransactionMerklePath default position arg (Sjors Provoost)
39d3b538e6a2af8db85077e958970cdcd0ee7f7d Rename merkle branch to path (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
This PR implements the refactors suggested in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30955#pullrequestreview-2354931253.
ACKs for top commit:
tdb3:
code review re-ACK f86678156a3d3ce6488b383a2d6d91d28fcd2b73
itornaza:
re ACK f86678156a3d3ce6488b383a2d6d91d28fcd2b73
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK f86678156a3d3ce6488b383a2d6d91d28fcd2b73 only changes since last review are a whitespace change and adding an Assume statement to check for size_t -> uint32_t overflows
Tree-SHA512: 661b5d5d0e24b2269bf33ab1484e37c36e67b32a7796d77ca3b1856d3043378b081ad43c32a8638b46fa8c0de51c823fd9747dd9fc81f958f20d327bf330a47c
52fd1511a774d1ff9e747b2ce88aa1fcb778ced8 test: drop scriptPubKeyIn arg from CreateNewBlock (Sjors Provoost)
ff41b9e296aba0237e068fab181523c50bf8c9d0 Drop script_pub_key arg from createNewBlock (Sjors Provoost)
7ab733ede444aee61ab52670c228eec811268c6f rpc: rename coinbase_script to coinbase_output_script (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
Providing a script for the coinbase transaction is only done in test code and for (unoptimized) CPU solo mining.
Production miners use the `getblocktemplate` RPC which omits the coinbase transaction entirely from its block template, leaving it to external (pool) software to construct it.
This commit removes the `script_pub_key argument` from `createNewBlock()` in the Mining interface.
A coinbase script can still be passed via `BlockCreateOptions` instead. Tests are modified to do so.
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 52fd1511a774d1ff9e747b2ce88aa1fcb778ced8. No change since last review other than rebase
TheCharlatan:
Re-ACK 52fd1511a774d1ff9e747b2ce88aa1fcb778ced8
vasild:
ACK 52fd1511a774d1ff9e747b2ce88aa1fcb778ced8
Tree-SHA512: c4b3a53774d9a5dc90950e77f47a64dbb68f971baffbb9a0d8f59332ef8e52d0c039130c925bde73135b3d0e79e65d91d1df30dc4cff13f32d8a72e5c56669d8
To avoid future code changes from reintroducing the ambiguity fixed
by the previous commit, mark m_tip_block private and Assume that
it's not set to uint256::ZERO.
The TARGET_OBJECTS generator expression was introduced in the staging
branch when we aimed to build the libbitcoinconsensus shared library.
However, `bitcoin_consensus` is a STATIC library, not an OBJECT library.
This change updates the build system to link `bitcoin_consensus`
normally to `test_bitcoin`, resolving linking issues when building with
clang-cl.
c93bf0e6e2cd0e9dc979ed996e41cc1034bc1ad1 test: Add missing %c character test (Hodlinator)
76cca4aa6fcd363dee821c837b1b627ea137b7a4 test: Document non-parity between tinyformat and ConstevalFormatstring (Hodlinator)
533013cba20664e3581a8e4633cc188d5be3175a test: Prove+document ConstevalFormatString/tinyformat parity (Hodlinator)
b81a4659950a6c4e22316f66b55cae8afc4f4d9a refactor test: Profit from using namespace + using detail function (Hodlinator)
Pull request description:
Clarifies and puts the extent of parity under test.
Broken out from #30546 based on https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30546#discussion_r1755013263 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30546#discussion_r1756495304.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
re-ACK c93bf0e6e2cd0e9dc979ed996e41cc1034bc1ad1 🗜
l0rinc:
ACK c93bf0e6e2cd0e9dc979ed996e41cc1034bc1ad1
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK c93bf0e6e2cd0e9dc979ed996e41cc1034bc1ad1. Just a few cleanups tweaking function declarations and commit comments and consolidating some test cases since last review.
Tree-SHA512: 5ecc893b26cf2761c0009861be392ec4c4fceb0ef95052a2f6f9df76b2e459cfb3f9e257f61be07c3bb2ecc6e525e72c5ca853be1f63b70b52785323d3db6b42
Same as https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113951.
Avoids compile failures under clang-20 &
`D_LIBCPP_REMOVE_TRANSITIVE_INCLUDES`:
```bash
In file included from /bitcoin/src/test/fuzz/addition_overflow.cpp:5:
/bitcoin/src/test/fuzz/FuzzedDataProvider.h:209:5: error: use of undeclared identifier 'abort'
209 | abort();
| ^
/bitcoin/src/test/fuzz/FuzzedDataProvider.h:250:5: error: use of undeclared identifier 'abort'
250 | abort();
```
31e59d94c67b58f24dd701fc7ccfee7d79f311cb iwyu: Drop backported mapping (Hennadii Stepanov)
fe9bc5abef3dcbe0f6395c3233f9d122579cd1f0 ci: Update Clang in "tidy" job (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR switches to the latest [IWYU 0.23](https://github.com/include-what-you-use/include-what-you-use/releases/tag/0.23), which is compatible with Clang 19.
New "bugprone-use-after-move" and "modernize-use-starts-ends-with" warnings that emerged have been addressed.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
lgtm ACK 31e59d94c67b58f24dd701fc7ccfee7d79f311cb
l0rinc:
ACK 31e59d94c67b58f24dd701fc7ccfee7d79f311cb
theuni:
ACK 31e59d94c67b58f24dd701fc7ccfee7d79f311cb
Tree-SHA512: ae0ca150673e1bfa78664f2ef35dbc965094b32374cafeeae390c6d368c28169a7f7790debe9a6eeb5efc39c9a468f5032d92f30cc4032b09d8265f6a75de882
- For "%n", which is supposed to write to the argument for printf.
- For string/integer mismatches of width/precision specifiers.
Co-Authored-By: Ryan Ofsky <ryan@ofsky.org>
Also adds BOOST_CHECK_NO_THROW() while touching that line, clarifying part of what we are checking for.
Also removed redundant inline from template functions in .cpp file.
0184d33b3d28fe78a2ee228417ebfd6f46fcaee5 scripted-diff: Replace strprintf(Untranslated) with Untranslated(strprintf) (Ryan Ofsky)
006e4d1d5984d841c9ac0a6f3c40cfd51e774eda refactor: Use + instead of strformat to concatenate translated & untranslated strings (Ryan Ofsky)
831d2bfcf94117957a90f60fa5bc84a53bb61f7c refactor: Don't embed translated string in untranslated string. (Ryan Ofsky)
058021969b542fc865d17d22fa21e48c9abe4a6e refactor: Avoid concatenation of format strings (Ryan Ofsky)
Pull request description:
This PR cleans up string formatting in the codebase so other PRs adding compile time checking can be simpler and easier to review (specifically #30928, #31061, #31074, and #31149).
Currently these PRs are hard to review because in addition to changing formatting APIs, they have to update callers that are using the API's in unusual ways. Clean up these callers now so later PRs can be simpler. Specifically:
- Use string literals instead of `std::string` format strings to enable more compile-time checking.
- Avoid using untranslated bilingual strings as format strings. Use originals so they can by checked at compile time.
- Favor `Untranslated(strprintf(...))` over `strprintf(Untranslated(...), ...)` for consistency and to prevent translated and untranslated strings from being unintentionally combined.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
lgtm ACK 0184d33b3d28fe78a2ee228417ebfd6f46fcaee5 🔹
l0rinc:
ACK 0184d33b3d28fe78a2ee228417ebfd6f46fcaee5 - no overall difference because of the rebase
Tree-SHA512: 37eb771187d30977f5f054eddb82af6dd69878ace89cede72032bb389e57200898119f9fe486ce6903ebb00cb24648be215ab3e44842b3d206b35e26038da750
This change switches to the latest IWYU 0.23, which is compatible with
Clang 19.
Fixed new "modernize-use-starts-ends-with" warnings.
The new "bugprone-use-after-move" warning in `result_tests.cpp` is a
false positive caused by a bug in Boost.Test versions < 1.87. This has
been addressed by introducing a local variable.
See upstream references:
- Issue: https://github.com/boostorg/test/issues/343
- Fix: https://github.com/boostorg/test/pull/348
Co-authored-by: MarcoFalke <*~=`'#}+{/-|&$^_@721217.xyz>
1807df3d9fb0135057a33e01173080ea14b0403d test: addrman: tried 3 times and never a success so `isTerrible=true` (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR adds test coverage for the following verification:
```cpp
if (TicksSinceEpoch<std::chrono::seconds>(m_last_success) == 0 && nAttempts >= ADDRMAN_RETRIES) { // tried N times and never a success
return true;
}
```
If we've tried an address for 3 or more times and were unsuccessful, this address should be pointed out as "terrible".
-------
You can test this by applying:
```diff
diff --git a/src/addrman.cpp b/src/addrman.cpp
index 054a9bee32..93a9521b59 100644
--- a/src/addrman.cpp
+++ b/src/addrman.cpp
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ bool AddrInfo::IsTerrible(NodeSeconds now) const
}
if (TicksSinceEpoch<std::chrono::seconds>(m_last_success) == 0 && nAttempts >= ADDRMAN_RETRIES) { // tried N times and never a success
- return true;
+ return false;
}
```
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
re-ACK 1807df3d9fb0135057a33e01173080ea14b0403d
naumenkogs:
ACK 1807df3d9fb0135057a33e01173080ea14b0403d
achow101:
ACK 1807df3d9fb0135057a33e01173080ea14b0403d
Tree-SHA512: e3cc43c98bddfe90f585d5b4bd00543be443b77ecaf038615261aa8cc4d14fc2f1006d0b00c04188040eaace455c5c6dbb3bb200a2c0f29c3b4ef5128bf0973a
This makes code more consistent and makes it easier to add compile-time checking to
enforce that format strings contain the right specifiers, because it stops
using Untranslated() to create the format string, so the Untranslated()
function will not need to get involved in formatting.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
quote='"[^"]+"'
quotes="(?:$quote|\\s)*"
nonparens="[^()]*"
single_level_paren="\($nonparens\)"
double_level_paren="\($nonparens\($nonparens\)$nonparens\)"
exprs="(?:$double_level_paren|$single_level_paren|$nonparens)*"
git grep -l 'Untranslated' | xargs perl -0777 -i -pe "s/strprintf\((\\W*)Untranslated\(($quotes)\)($exprs)(\))/Untranslated(\1strprintf(\2\3))/gs"
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
50cce20013c97e1257cb9f4c9319701a09b0a196 test, refactor: Compact ccoins_access and ccoins_spend (Lőrinc)
0a159f0914775756dcac2d9fa7fe4e4d4e70ba0c test, refactor: Remove remaining unbounded flags from coins_tests (Lőrinc)
c0b4b2c1eef95c0b626573a9a2e217f4a541a880 test: Validate error messages on fail (Lőrinc)
d5f8d607ab1f8fd9fc17aba4105867b450117be2 test: Group values and states in tests into CoinEntry wrappers (Lőrinc)
ca74aa7490a5005d227da75dc8f2d1ab73c6e9d2 test, refactor: Migrate GetCoinsMapEntry to return MaybeCoin (Lőrinc)
15aaa81c3818b4138602c127d6a16018aae75687 coins, refactor: Remove direct GetFlags access (Lőrinc)
6b733699cfc79253ffae1527106baa428dd62f39 coins, refactor: Assume state after SetClean in AddFlags to prevent dangling pointers (Lőrinc)
fc8c282022e6ce4eb3ce526800a6ada3b4a2996d coins, refactor: Make AddFlags, SetDirty, SetFresh static (Lőrinc)
cd0498eabc910efa3ed7a6d32e687107248bb5be coins, refactor: Split up AddFlags to remove invalid states (Lőrinc)
Pull request description:
Similarly to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30849, this cleanup is intended to de-risk https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30673#discussion_r1739909068 by simplifying the coin cache public interface.
`CCoinsCacheEntry` provided general access to its internal flags state, even though, in reality, it could only be `clean`, `fresh`, `dirty`, or `fresh|dirty` (in the follow-up, we will remove `fresh` without `dirty`).
Once it was marked as `dirty`, we couldn’t set the state back to clean with `AddFlags(0)`—tests explicitly checked against that.
This PR refines the public interface to make this distinction clearer and to make invalid behavior impossible, rather than just checked by tests. We don't need extensive access to the internals of `CCoinsCacheEntry`, as many tests were simply validating invalid combinations in this way.
The last few commits contain significant test refactorings to make `coins_tests` easier to change in follow-ups.
ACKs for top commit:
andrewtoth:
Code Review ACK 50cce20013c97e1257cb9f4c9319701a09b0a196
laanwj:
Code review ACK 50cce20013c97e1257cb9f4c9319701a09b0a196
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 50cce20013c97e1257cb9f4c9319701a09b0a196. Looks good! Thanks for the followups.
Tree-SHA512: c0d65f1c7680b4bb9cd368422b218f2473c2ec75a32c7350a6e11e8a1601c81d3c0ae651b9f1dae08400fb4e5d43431d9e4ccca305a718183f9a936fe47c1a6c
fa3e074304780549b1e7972217930e34fa55f59a refactor: Tidy fixups (MarcoFalke)
fa72646f2b197810a324cb0544d9a1fac37d3f9c move-only: Detail_CheckNumFormatSpecifiers and G_TRANSLATION_FUN (MarcoFalke)
faff8403f0aac3b5ec26d3c7fc98240f879f9906 refactor: Pick translated string after format (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The changes are required for https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31061, however they also make sense on their own. For example, they are fixing up an `inline namespace`, which lead to compile errors otherwise (can be tested by observing the compile error after reverting the changes to `src/util/strencodings.h`). Also, a unit test comment is fixed.
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fa3e074304780549b1e7972217930e34fa55f59a. Nice changes! These should allow related PRs to be simpler.
l0rinc:
ACK fa3e074304780549b1e7972217930e34fa55f59a
hodlinator:
cr-ACK fa3e074304780549b1e7972217930e34fa55f59a
Tree-SHA512: 37371181a348610442186b5fbb7a6032d0caf70aae566002ad60be329a3131a2b89f28f6c51e10872079f987986925dc8c0611bde639057bee4f572d2b9ba92a
faf70cc9941ce2b0ce4fd48ecfdbe28194adb8ba Remove wallet::ParseISO8601DateTime, use ParseISO8601DateTime instead (MarcoFalke)
2222aecd5f8059785e655da7b7e3fcc59204245c util: Implement ParseISO8601DateTime based on C++20 (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
`boost::posix_time` in `ParseISO8601DateTime` has many issues:
* It parses random strings that are clearly invalid and returns a time value for them, see [1] below.
* None of the separators `-`, or `:`, or `T`, or `Z` are validated.
* It may crash when running under a hardened C++ library, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28917.
* It has been unmaintained for years, so reporting or fixing any issues will most likely be useless.
* It pulls in a third-party dependency, when the functionality is already included in vanilla C++20.
Fix all issues by replacing it with a simple helper function written in C++20.
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28917.
[1] The following patch passes on current master:
```diff
diff --git a/src/wallet/test/rpc_util_tests.cpp b/src/wallet/test/rpc_util_tests.cpp
index 32f6f5ab46..c1c94c7116 100644
--- a/src/wallet/test/rpc_util_tests.cpp
+++ b/src/wallet/test/rpc_util_tests.cpp
@@ -12,6 +12,14 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE(wallet_util_tests)
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(util_ParseISO8601DateTime)
{
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ParseISO8601DateTime("964296"), 242118028800);
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ParseISO8601DateTime("244622"), 15023836800);
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ParseISO8601DateTime("+INfINITy"), 9223372036854);
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ParseISO8601DateTime("7000802 01"), 158734166400);
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ParseISO8601DateTime("7469-2 +INfINITy"), 9223372036854);
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ParseISO8601DateTime("maXimum-datE-time"), 253402300799);
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ParseISO8601DateTime("577737 114maXimum-datE-time"), 253402300799);
+
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ParseISO8601DateTime("1970-01-01T00:00:00Z"), 0);
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ParseISO8601DateTime("1960-01-01T00:00:00Z"), 0);
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ParseISO8601DateTime("2000-01-01T00:00:01Z"), 946684801);
```
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK faf70cc9941ce2b0ce4fd48ecfdbe28194adb8ba, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK.
dergoegge:
utACK faf70cc9941ce2b0ce4fd48ecfdbe28194adb8ba
Tree-SHA512: 9dd745a356d04acf6200e13a6af52c51a9e2a0eeccea110093ce5da147b3c669c0eda918e46db0164c081a78c8feae3fe557a4759bea18449a8ff2d090095931
32fc59796f74a2941772b5ec2755b1319132cd9c rpc: Allow single transaction through submitpackage (glozow)
Pull request description:
There's no particular reason to restrict single transaction submissions with submitpackage. This change relaxes the RPC checks as enables the `AcceptPackage` flow to accept packages of a single transaction.
Resolves#31085
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
ACK 32fc59796f
achow101:
ACK 32fc59796f74a2941772b5ec2755b1319132cd9c
glozow:
ACK 32fc59796f74a2941772b5ec2755b1319132cd9c
Tree-SHA512: ffed353bfdca610ffcfd53b40b76da05ffc26df6bac4b0421492e067bede930380e03399d2e2d1d17f0e88fb91cd8eb376e3aabebbabcc724590bf068d09807c
This makes the debug output mostly the same for -par=1 and parallel validation runs. Of course,
parallel validation is non-deterministic in what error it may encounter first if there are
multiple issues. Also, the way certain script-related and non-script-related checks are
performed differs between the two modes still, which may result in discrepancies.
The check type function now needs to return a std::optional<R> for some type R,
and the check queue overall will return std::nullopt if all individual checks
return that, or one of the non-nullopt values if there is at least one.
For most tests, we use R=int, but for the actual validation code, we make it return
the ScriptError.
The `ccoins_add` and `ccoins_write` tests check the actual exception error messages now instead of just that they fail for the given parameters.
This enables us testing different exceptions in a more fine-grained way in later changes.
We don't need so much access to the internals of CCoinsCacheEntry, since many tests are just exercising invalid combinations this way.
This implies that `AddFlags` has private access now.
CCoinsCacheEntry provided general access to its internal flags state, even though in reality it could only be clean, fresh, dirty or fresh|dirty.
After it got dirtied we couldn't set the state back to clean by AddFlags(0) - tests were explicitly checking against that.
This commit cleans up the public interface to make this distinction cleaner and invalid behavior impossible instead of just checked by tests.
This includes the removal of redundant `inline` qualifiers (we're inside a struct).
Also renamed `self` to `pair` to simplify the upcoming commits.
Also modernized `EmplaceCoinInternalDANGER` since it was already modified.
Co-authored-by: Andrew Toth <andrewstoth@gmail.com>
37a5c5d83664c31d83fc649d3c8c858bd5f10f21 doc: update descriptors.md for getdescriptoractivity (James O'Beirne)
ee3ce6a4f4d35afe7fcab16eff419a6788b02170 test: rpc: add no address case for getdescriptoractivity (James O'Beirne)
811f76f3a511d20750046319b390e225a1151caa rpc: add getdescriptoractivity (James O'Beirne)
25fe087de59e967ce968d35ed77138325eb9a9fa rpc: move-only: move ScriptPubKeyDoc to utils (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
The RPC command `scanblocks` provides a useful way to get a set of blockhashes that have activity relevant to a set of descriptors (`relevant_blocks`). However actually extracting the activity from those blocks is left as an exercise to the end user.
This process involves not only generating the (potentially ranged) set of scripts for the descriptor set on the client side (maybe via `deriveaddresses`), but then the user must retrieve each block's contents one-by-one using `getblock <hash>`, which is transmitted over a network link. And that's all before they perform the actual search over block content. There's even more work required to incorporate unconfirmed transactions.
This PR introduces an RPC `getdescriptoractivity` that [dovetails](https://bitcoin-irc.chaincode.com/bitcoin-core-dev/2024-08-16#1046393;) with `scanblocks` output, handling the process described above. Users specify the blockhashes (perhaps from `relevant_blocks`) and a set of descriptors; they are then given all spend/receive activity in that set of blocks.
This is a very useful tool when implementing lightweight wallets that want neither to require a third-party indexer like electrs, nor the overhead of creating and managing watch-only wallets in Core. This allows Core to be more easily used in a "stateless" manner by wallets, with potentially many nodes interchangeably acting as backends.
### Example usage
```
% ./src/bitcoin-cli scanblocks start \
'["addr(bc1p0cp0vyag6snlta2l7c4am3rue7eef9f72l7uhx52m4v27vfydx9s8tfs7t)"]' \
857263
{
"from_height": 857263,
"to_height": 858263,
"relevant_blocks": [
"00000000000000000002bc5cc78f5b0913a5230a8f4b0d5060bc9a60900a5a88",
"00000000000000000001c5291ed6a40c06d3db5c8fb738567654b24a14b24ecb"
],
"completed": true
}
% ./src/bitcoin-cli getdescriptoractivity \
'["00000000000000000002bc5cc78f5b0913a5230a8f4b0d5060bc9a60900a5a88", "00000000000000000001c5291ed6a40c06d3db5c8fb738567654b24a14b24ecb"]' \
'["addr(bc1p0cp0vyag6snlta2l7c4am3rue7eef9f72l7uhx52m4v27vfydx9s8tfs7t)"]'
{
"activity": [
{
"type": "receive",
"amount": 0.00002900,
"blockhash": "00000000000000000002bc5cc78f5b0913a5230a8f4b0d5060bc9a60900a5a88",
"height": 857907,
"txid": "c9d34f202c1f66d80cae76f305350f5fdde910b97cf6ae6bf79f5bcf2a337d06",
"vout": 254,
"output_spk": {
"asm": "1 7e02f613a8d427f5f55ff62bddc47ccfb394953e57fdcb9a8add58af3124698b",
"desc": "rawtr(7e02f613a8d427f5f55ff62bddc47ccfb394953e57fdcb9a8add58af3124698b)#yewcd80j",
"hex": "51207e02f613a8d427f5f55ff62bddc47ccfb394953e57fdcb9a8add58af3124698b",
"address": "bc1p0cp0vyag6snlta2l7c4am3rue7eef9f72l7uhx52m4v27vfydx9s8tfs7t",
"type": "witness_v1_taproot"
}
},
{
"type": "spend",
"amount": 0.00002900,
"blockhash": "00000000000000000001c5291ed6a40c06d3db5c8fb738567654b24a14b24ecb",
"height": 858260,
"spend_txid": "7f61d1b248d4ee46376f9c6df272f63fbb0c17039381fb23ca5d90473b823c36",
"spend_vin": 0,
"prevout_txid": "c9d34f202c1f66d80cae76f305350f5fdde910b97cf6ae6bf79f5bcf2a337d06",
"prevout_vout": 254,
"prevout_spk": {
"asm": "1 7e02f613a8d427f5f55ff62bddc47ccfb394953e57fdcb9a8add58af3124698b",
"desc": "rawtr(7e02f613a8d427f5f55ff62bddc47ccfb394953e57fdcb9a8add58af3124698b)#yewcd80j",
"hex": "51207e02f613a8d427f5f55ff62bddc47ccfb394953e57fdcb9a8add58af3124698b",
"address": "bc1p0cp0vyag6snlta2l7c4am3rue7eef9f72l7uhx52m4v27vfydx9s8tfs7t",
"type": "witness_v1_taproot"
}
}
]
}
```
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
reACK 37a5c5d83664c31d83fc649d3c8c858bd5f10f21
achow101:
ACK 37a5c5d83664c31d83fc649d3c8c858bd5f10f21
tdb3:
Code review and light retest ACK 37a5c5d83664c31d83fc649d3c8c858bd5f10f21
rkrux:
re-ACK 37a5c5d83664c31d83fc649d3c8c858bd5f10f21
Tree-SHA512: 04aa51e329c6c2ed72464b9886281d5ebd7511a8a8e184ea81249033a4dad535a12829b1010afc2da79b344ea8b5ab8ed47e426d0bf2eb78ab395d20b1da8dbb
11f3bc229ccd4b20191855fb1df882cfa6145264 refactor: Reserve vectors in fuzz tests (Lőrinc)
152fefe7a22b7da3cfe2815083634bece9c5654e refactor: Preallocate PrevectorFillVector(In)Direct without vector resize (Lőrinc)
a774c7a339c26b1409c9a9572d2b52810ee64062 refactor: Fix remaining clang-tidy performance-inefficient-vector errors (Lőrinc)
Pull request description:
PR inspired by https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29608#issuecomment-2437847307 (and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29458, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29606, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29607, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30093).
The `clang-tidy` check can be run via:
```bash
cmake -B build -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=clang -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=clang++ -DCMAKE_EXPORT_COMPILE_COMMANDS=ON -DBUILD_BENCH=ON -DBUILD_FUZZ_BINARY=ON -DBUILD_FOR_FUZZING=ON && cmake --build build -j$(nproc)
run-clang-tidy -quiet -p build -j $(nproc) -checks='-*,performance-inefficient-vector-operation' | grep -v 'clang-tidy'
```
which revealed 3 tests and 1 prod warning (+ fuzz and benching, found by hebasto).
Even though the tests aren't performance critical, getting rid of these warnings (for which the checks were already enabled via https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/.clang-tidy#L18, see below), the fix was quite simple.
<details>
<summary>clang-tidy -list-checks</summary>
```bash
cd src && clang-tidy -list-checks | grep 'vector'
performance-inefficient-vector-operation
```
</details>
<details>
<summary>Output before the change</summary>
```
src/test/rpc_tests.cpp:434:9: error: 'emplace_back' is called inside a loop; consider pre-allocating the container capacity before the loop [performance-inefficient-vector-operation,-warnings-as-errors]
433 | for (int64_t i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
434 | feerates.emplace_back(1 ,1);
| ^
src/test/checkqueue_tests.cpp:366:13: error: 'emplace_back' is called inside a loop; consider pre-allocating the container capacity before the loop [performance-inefficient-vector-operation,-warnings-as-errors]
365 | for (size_t i = 0; i < 3; ++i) {
366 | tg.emplace_back(
| ^
src/test/cuckoocache_tests.cpp:231:9: error: 'emplace_back' is called inside a loop; consider pre-allocating the container capacity before the loop [performance-inefficient-vector-operation,-warnings-as-errors]
228 | for (uint32_t x = 0; x < 3; ++x)
229 | /** Each thread is emplaced with x copy-by-value
230 | */
231 | threads.emplace_back([&, x] {
| ^
src/rpc/output_script.cpp:127:17: error: 'push_back' is called inside a loop; consider pre-allocating the container capacity before the loop [performance-inefficient-vector-operation,-warnings-as-errors]
126 | for (unsigned int i = 0; i < keys.size(); ++i) {
127 | pubkeys.push_back(HexToPubKey(keys[i].get_str()));
| ^
```
And the fuzz and benchmarks, noticed by hebasto: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31305#issuecomment-2483124499
</details>
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
review ACK 11f3bc229ccd4b20191855fb1df882cfa6145264 🎦
achow101:
ACK 11f3bc229ccd4b20191855fb1df882cfa6145264
theuni:
ACK 11f3bc229ccd4b20191855fb1df882cfa6145264
hebasto:
ACK 11f3bc229ccd4b20191855fb1df882cfa6145264, tested with clang 19.1.5 + clang-tidy.
Tree-SHA512: 41691c19f35c63b922a95407617a54f9bff1af3f95f99d15642064f321df038aeb1ae5f061f854ed913f69036807cc28fa6222b2ff4c24ef43b909027fa0f9b3
And under the hood suppoert single transactions
in AcceptPackage. This simplifies user experience
and paves the way for reducing number of codepaths
for transaction acceptance in the future.
Co-Authored-By: instagibbs <gsanders87@gmail.com>
* Since the main LIMITED_WHILE stated `outpoints.size() < 200'000`, I've presized outpoints accordingly.
* `tx_mut.vin` and `tx_mut.vout` weren't caught by the clang-tidy, but addressed them anyway.
