4ba1d0b55339c3ea90e2bcd64662a06f0f90dd46 fuzz: Add coverage for client_maxfeerate (Greg Sanders)
91d7d8f22a1c528db14fa743c66cd861ea00e84b AcceptMultipleTransactions: Fix workspace client_maxfeerate (Greg Sanders)
f3aa5bd5eb6d1088f98a4dc7daaab0e17a7d5529 fill_mempool: assertions and docsctring update (Greg Sanders)
a3da63e8febe475f2250f6432bca237d31fa9107 Move fill_mempool to util function (Greg Sanders)
73b68bd8b4f9447e30091c7f8c3dc91a086bd93b fill_mempool: remove subtest-specific comment (Greg Sanders)
Pull request description:
Bug causes an `Assume()` failure due to the expectation that the individual result should be invalid when done over `submitpackage` via rpc.
Bug introduced by https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28950 , and I discovered it rebasing https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28984 since it's easier to hit in that test scenario.
Tests in place were only checking `AcceptSingleTransaction`-level checks due to package evaluation only triggering when minfee is too high for the parent transaction.
Added test along with fix, moving the fill_mempool utility into a common area for re-use.
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
reACK 4ba1d0b55339c3ea90e2bcd64662a06f0f90dd46
theStack:
ACK 4ba1d0b55339c3ea90e2bcd64662a06f0f90dd46
ismaelsadeeq:
re-ACK 4ba1d0b553 via [diff](4fe7d150eb..4ba1d0b553)
Tree-SHA512: 3729bdf7f25d04e232f173ccee04ddbb2afdaafa3d04292a01cecf58fb11b3b2bc133e8490277f1a67622b62d17929c242dc980f9bb647896beea4332ee35306
d5a715536e497c160a2520f81334aab6c7490213 build: remove boost::process dependency for building external signer support (Sebastian Falbesoner)
70434b1c443d9251a880d0193af771f574c40617 external_signer: replace boost::process with cpp-subprocess (Sebastian Falbesoner)
cc8b9875b104c31f0a5b5e4195a8278ec55f35f7 Add `cpp-subprocess` header-only library (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Closes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/24907.
This PR is based on **theStack**'s [work](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/24907#issuecomment-1466087049).
The `subprocess.hpp` header has been sourced from the [upstream repo](https://github.com/arun11299/cpp-subprocess) with the only modification being the removal of convenience functions, which are not utilized in our codebase.
Windows-related changes will be addressed in subsequent follow-ups.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
reACK d5a715536e497c160a2520f81334aab6c7490213
Sjors:
re-tACK d5a715536e497c160a2520f81334aab6c7490213
theStack:
Light re-ACK d5a715536e497c160a2520f81334aab6c7490213
fanquake:
ACK d5a715536e497c160a2520f81334aab6c7490213 - with the expectation that this code is going to be maintained as our own. Next PRs should:
Tree-SHA512: d7fb6fecc3f5792496204190afb7d85b3e207b858fb1a75efe483c05260843b81b27d14b299323bb667c990e87a07197059afea3796cf218ed8b614086bd3611
a8203e94123b6ea6e4f4a6320e3ad20457f44a28 refactor: Simplify `extra_txn` to be a vec of CTransactionRef instead of a vec of pair<Wtxid, CTransactionRef> (AngusP)
c3c18433ae1d5b024d4cb92c762f5ca0ec7849c8 refactor: Use typesafe Wtxid in compact block encoding message, instead of ambiguous uint256. (AngusP)
Pull request description:
The first commit replaces `uint256` with typesafe `Wtxid` (or `Txid`) types introduced in #28107.
The second commit then simplifies the extra tx `vector` to just be of `CTransactionRef`s instead of a `std::pair<Wtxid, CTransactionRef>`, as it's easy to get a `Wtxid` from a transaction ref.
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
ACK a8203e94123b6ea6e4f4a6320e3ad20457f44a28
dergoegge:
ACK a8203e94123b6ea6e4f4a6320e3ad20457f44a28
Tree-SHA512: b4ba1423a8059f9fc118782bd8a668213d229c822f22b01267de74d6ea97fe4f2aad46b5da7c0178ecc9905293e9a0eafba1d75330297c055e27fd53c8c8ebfd
All `CTransactionRef` have `.GetWitnessHash()` that returns a cached `const Wtxid` (since fac1223a568fa1ad6dd602350598eed278d115e8),
so we don't need to pass transaction refs around with their IDs as they're easy to get from a ref.
561a650e0f669159699224ddd4eb5b1c91cf9ac3 test: Fix debug recommendation in argsman_tests (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
There are recommendations in the `argsman_tests` comments on how to re-run and debug a test failure to see if it reflects an expected or unexpected change. The command tries to run a test in `util_tests` but this is in `argsman_tests` so the command doesn't work with just copy+paste. I didn't investigate further but I suspect that these tests were moved between files.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 561a650e0f669159699224ddd4eb5b1c91cf9ac3
Tree-SHA512: b3bb94ba1635c9455149b455f2b30ee37a8067a6242339531ab54d428177a288da29a4a10702652305eb34aa7638f51dad35fa6b0e7b74617e445327b8c4c053
fa9f36babaceba6ab2f88e64bc4bc2956f58871f build: Remove HAVE_GMTIME_R (MarcoFalke)
fa72dcbfa56177ca878375bae7c7bca6ca6a1f40 refactor: FormatISO8601* without gmtime* (MarcoFalke)
fa2c486afc8501f2678cc19c9e9518a23c4ebcbd Revert "time: add runtime sanity check" (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Now that the `ChronoSanityCheck` has passed for everyone with C++17 and is guaranteed by C++20 to always pass, remove it.
Also, remove `gmtime_r` and `gmtime_s` and replace them with `year_month_day`+`hh_mm_ss` from C++20.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK fa9f36babaceba6ab2f88e64bc4bc2956f58871f
fanquake:
ACK fa9f36babaceba6ab2f88e64bc4bc2956f58871f - more std lib & even less stuff to port.
Tree-SHA512: a9e7e805b757b7dade0bcc3f95273a7dc4f68622630d74838339789dd203ad7542d36b2e090a93b2bc5a7ecc383207dd7ec82c68147108bdac7ce44f088c8c9a
80f8b92f4f2311b9e9a25361c9dd973244e6f95c remove libbitcoinconsensus (fanquake)
Pull request description:
This was deprecated in `v27.0`, for removal in `v28.0`. See discussion in PR #29189.
ACKs for top commit:
theuni:
Concept ACK and light review ACK 80f8b92f4f2311b9e9a25361c9dd973244e6f95c. My only hesitation here is that (afaics?) there's now nothing keeping undesired features like threading or globals from working their way into the interpreter in future commits.
m3dwards:
Concept ACK 80f8b92f4f
TheCharlatan:
ACK 80f8b92f4f2311b9e9a25361c9dd973244e6f95c
hebasto:
ACK 80f8b92f4f2311b9e9a25361c9dd973244e6f95c, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK.
Tree-SHA512: 17a62118aeb088f2695c892bb32794dfea3061e3cb7d9e8e9f1c06c3ff6f63a7587fa532e37edbb91fbc5a19b12c9a0f8e05fa9e8864aa07f92665375d847e80
72959867784098137a50c34f86deca8235eef4f8 Unit tests for CalculateFeerateDiagramsForRBF (Greg Sanders)
b767e6bd47cb0fb8f7aea3fb10c597e59a35bf74 test: unit test for ImprovesFeerateDiagram (Greg Sanders)
7e89b659e1ddd0c04fa2bddba9706b5d1a1daec3 Add fuzz test for FeeFrac (Greg Sanders)
4d6528a3d6bf3821c216c68f99170e2faab5d63c fuzz: fuzz diagram creation and comparison (Greg Sanders)
e9c5aeb11d641b8cae373452339760809625021d test: Add tests for CompareFeerateDiagram and CheckConflictTopology (Greg Sanders)
588a98dccc5dbb6e331f28d83a4a10a13d70eb31 fuzz: Add fuzz target for ImprovesFeerateDiagram (Greg Sanders)
2079b80854e2595f6f696e7c13a56c7f2a7da9f4 Implement ImprovesFeerateDiagram (Greg Sanders)
66d966dcfaad3638f84654e710f403cb0a0a2ac7 Add FeeFrac unit tests (Greg Sanders)
ce8e22542ed0b4fa5794d3203207146418d59473 Add FeeFrac utils (Greg Sanders)
Pull request description:
This is a smaller piece of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28984 broken off for easier review.
Up to date explanation of diagram checks are here: https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/mempool-incentive-compatibility/553
This infrastructure has two near term applications prior to cluster mempool:
1) Limited Package RBF(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28984): We want to allow package RBF only when we know it improves the mempool. This narrowly scoped functionality allows use with v3-like topologies, and will be expanded at some point post-cluster mempool when diagram checks can be done efficiently against bounded cluster sizes.
2) Replacement for single tx RBF(in a cluster size of up to two) against conflicts of up to cluster size two. `ImprovesFeerateDiagram` interface will have to change for this use-case, which is a future direction to solve certain pins and improve mempool incentive compatibility: https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/ephemeral-anchors-and-mev/383#diagram-checks-fix-this-3
And longer-term, this would be the proposed way we would compute incentive compatibility for all conflicts, post-cluster mempool.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK 72959867784098137a50c34f86deca8235eef4f8
glozow:
code review ACK 72959867784098137a50c34f86deca8235eef4f8
murchandamus:
utACK 72959867784098137a50c34f86deca8235eef4f8
ismaelsadeeq:
Re-ACK 7295986778
willcl-ark:
crACK 72959867784098137a50c34f86deca8235eef4f8
sdaftuar:
ACK 72959867784098137a50c34f86deca8235eef4f8
Tree-SHA512: 79593e5a087801c06f06cc8b73aa3e7b96ab938d3b90f5d229c4e4bfca887a77b447605c49aa5eb7ddcead85706c534ac5eb6146ae2396af678f4beaaa5bea8e
9d9a7458a2570f7db56ab626b22010591089c312 assumeutxo: Remove BLOCK_ASSUMED_VALID flag (Ryan Ofsky)
ef174e9ed21c08f38e5d4b537b6decfd1f646db9 test: assumeutxo snapshot block CheckBlockIndex crash test (Ryan Ofsky)
0391458d767b842a7925785a7053400c0e1cb55a test: assumeutxo stale block CheckBlockIndex crash test (Ryan Ofsky)
ef29c8b662309a438121a83f27fd7bdd1779700c assumeutxo: Get rid of faked nTx and nChainTx values (Ryan Ofsky)
9b97d5bbf980d657a277c85d113c2ae3e870e0ec doc: Improve comments describing setBlockIndexCandidates checks (Ryan Ofsky)
0fd915ee6bef63bb360ccc5c039a3c11676c38e3 validation: Check GuessVerificationProgress is not called with disconnected block (Ryan Ofsky)
63e8fc912c21a2f5b47e8eab10fb13c604afed85 ci: add getchaintxstats ubsan suppressions (Ryan Ofsky)
f252e687ec94b6ccafb5bc44b7df3daeb473fdea assumeutxo test: Add RPC test for fake nTx and nChainTx values (Ryan Ofsky)
Pull request description:
The `PopulateAndValidateSnapshot` function introduced in f6e2da5fb7c6406c37612c838c998078ea8d2252 from #19806 has been setting fake `nTx` and `nChainTx` values that can show up in RPC results (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29328) and make `CBlockIndex` state hard to reason about, because it is difficult to know whether the values are real or fake.
Revert to previous behavior of setting `nTx` and `nChainTx` to 0 when the values are unknown, instead of faking them. Also drop no-longer needed `BLOCK_ASSUMED_VALID` flag.
Dropping the faked values also fixes assert failures in the `CheckBlockIndex` `(pindex->nChainTx == pindex->nTx + prev_chain_tx)` check that could happen previously if forked or out-of-order blocks before the snapshot got submitted while the snapshot was being validated. The PR includes two commits adding tests for these failures and describing them in detail.
Compatibility note: This change could cause new `-checkblockindex` failures if a snapshot was loaded by a previous version of Bitcoin Core and not fully validated, because fake `nTx` values will have been saved to the block index. It would be pretty easy to avoid these failures by adding some compatibility code to `LoadBlockIndex` and changing `nTx` values from 1 to 0 when they are fake (when `(pindex->nStatus & BLOCK_VALID_MASK) < BLOCK_VALID_TRANSACTIONS`), but a little simpler not to worry about being compatible in this case.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-ACK 9d9a7458a2570f7db56ab626b22010591089c312
achow101:
ACK 9d9a7458a2570f7db56ab626b22010591089c312
mzumsande:
Tested ACK 9d9a7458a2570f7db56ab626b22010591089c312
maflcko:
ACK 9d9a7458a2570f7db56ab626b22010591089c312 🎯
Tree-SHA512: b1e1e2731ec36be30d5f5914042517219378fc31486674030c29d9c7488ed83fb60ba7095600f469dc32f0d8ba79c49ff7706303006507654e1762f26ee416e0
6e873df3478f3ab8f67d1b9339c7e990ae90e95b serfloat: improve/simplify tests (Pieter Wuille)
b45f1f56582fb3a0d17db5014ac57f1fb40a3611 serfloat: do not test encode(bits)=bits anymore (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
Closes#28941.
Our current tests for serfloat verify two distinct properties:
1. Whether they roundtrip `double`->`uint64_t`->`double` (excluding NaN values) on all systems.
2. Whether on systems with a typical floating point unit that encoding matches the hardware representation, as before v22.0, we would dump the hardware representation directly to disk and we wanted to retain compatibility with that.
#28941 seems to show that the second property doesn't always hold, but just for "subnormal" numbers (below $2^{-1021}$). Since we don't care about encoding these numbers, we could exclude such subnormal numbers from the hardware-identical representation test, but this PR goes further and just drops the second property entirely, as I don't think we care about edge-case compatibility with pre-v22.0 code for fee_estimates.dat (the only place it is used).
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
ACK 6e873df3478f3ab8f67d1b9339c7e990ae90e95b
fanquake:
ACK 6e873df3478f3ab8f67d1b9339c7e990ae90e95b - It's not as much of a priority, but I think we could still backport this.
Tree-SHA512: e18ceee0753a7ee7e999fdfa10b014dc5bb67b6ef79522a0f8c76b889adcfa785772fc26ed7559bcb5a09a9938e243bb54eedd9549bc59080a2c8090155e2267
626f8e398e219b84907ccaad036f69177d39284c fuzz: actually test garbage >64b in p2p transport test (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This fixes an oversight from #28196: in the `p2p_transport_bidirectional_v2` fuzz test, when the desired garbage length is over 64 bytes, the code would actually use garbage length 0. Fix this.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK 626f8e398e
brunoerg:
crACK 626f8e398e219b84907ccaad036f69177d39284c
Tree-SHA512: f6346367adb10464b6c9d20aef43625531d2a4d8110887ad03214b8c1907b83560f2dd5b5415e2180a40b4cd276d51881b32b60c740471b5c6bb218aa19848d8
38f70ba6ac86fb96c60571d2e1f316315c1c73cc RPC: Add maxfeerate and maxburnamount args to submitpackage (Greg Sanders)
Pull request description:
Resolves https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28949
I couldn't manage to do it very cleanly outside of (sub)package evaluation itself, since it would change the current interface very heavily. Instead I threaded through the max fee argument and used that directly via ATMPArgs. From that perspective, this is somewhat a reversion from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19339. In a post-cluster mempool world, these checks could be consolidated to right after the given (ancestor) package is linearized/chunked, by just checking the feerate of the top chunk and rejecting the submission entirely if the top chunk is too high.
The implication here is that subpackages can be submitted to the mempool prior to hitting this new fee-based error condition.
ACKs for top commit:
ismaelsadeeq:
Re-ACK 38f70ba6ac👍🏾
glozow:
ACK 38f70ba6ac with some non-blocking nits
murchandamus:
LGTM, code review ACK 38f70ba6ac86fb96c60571d2e1f316315c1c73cc
Tree-SHA512: 38212aa9de25730944cee58b0806a3d37097e42719af8dd7de91ce86bb5d9770b6f7c37354bf418bd8ba571c52947da1dcdbb968bf429dd1dbdf8715315af18f
The `PopulateAndValidateSnapshot` function introduced in
f6e2da5fb7c6406c37612c838c998078ea8d2252 from #19806 has been setting fake
`nTx` and `nChainTx` values that can show up in RPC results (see #29328) and
make `CBlockIndex` state hard to reason about, because it is difficult to know
whether the values are real or fake.
Revert to previous behavior of setting `nTx` and `nChainTx` to 0 when the
values are unknown, instead of faking them.
This commit fixes at least two assert failures in the (pindex->nChainTx ==
pindex->nTx + prev_chain_tx) check that would happen previously. Tests for
these failures are added separately in the next two commits.
Compatibility note: This change could result in -checkblockindex failures if a
snapshot was loaded by a previous version of Bitcoin Core and not fully
validated, because fake nTx values will have been saved to the block index. It
would be pretty easy to avoid these failures by adding some compatibility code
to `LoadBlockIndex` and changing `nTx` values from 1 to 0 when they are fake
(when `(pindex->nStatus & BLOCK_VALID_MASK) < BLOCK_VALID_TRANSACTIONS`), but a
little simpler not to worry about being compatible in this case.
28287cfbe18b6c468f76389e9f66bdcf2d00f8d1 test: add script compression coverage for not-on-curve P2PK outputs (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR adds unit test coverage for the script compression functions `{Compress,Decompress}Script` in the special case of uncompressed P2PK outputs (scriptPubKey: OP_PUSH65 <0x04 ....> OP_CHECKSIG) with [pubkeys that are not fully valid](44b05bf3fe/src/pubkey.cpp (L297-L302)), i.e. where the encoded point is not on the secp256k1 curve. For those outputs, script compression is not possible, as the y coordinate of the pubkey can't be recovered (see also call-site of `IsToPubKey`):
44b05bf3fe/src/compressor.cpp (L49-L50)
Likewise, for a compressed script of an uncompressed P2PK script (i.e. compression ids 4 and 5) where the x coordinate is not on the curve, decompression fails:
44b05bf3fe/src/compressor.cpp (L122-L129)
Note that the term "compression" is used here in two different meanings (though they are related), which might be a little confusing. The encoding of a pubkey can either be compressed (33-bytes with 0x02/0x03 prefixes) or uncompressed (65-bytes with 0x04 prefix). On the other hand there is also compression for whole output scripts, which is used for storing scriptPubKeys in the UTXO set in a compact way (and also for the `dumptxoutset` result, accordingly). P2PK output scripts with uncompressed pubkeys get compressed by storing only the x-coordinate and the sign as a prefix (0x04 = even, 0x05 = odd). Was diving deeper into the subject while working on https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27432, where the script decompression of uncompressed P2PK needed special handling (see also https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/24628#issuecomment-1108798536).
Trivia: as of now (block 801066), there are 13 uncompressed P2PK outputs in the UTXO set with a pubkey not on the curve (which obviously means they are unspendable).
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 28287cfbe18b6c468f76389e9f66bdcf2d00f8d1
tdb3:
ACK for 28287cfbe18b6c468f76389e9f66bdcf2d00f8d1.
cbergqvist:
ACK 28287cf!
marcofleon:
Nicely done, ACK 28287cfbe18b6c468f76389e9f66bdcf2d00f8d1. Built the PR branch, ran the unit and functional tests, everything passed.
Tree-SHA512: 777b6c3065654fbfa1ce94926f4cadb91a9ca9dc4dd4af6008ad77bd1da5416f156ad0dfa880d26faab2e168bf9b27e0a068abc9a2be2534d82bee61ee055c65
And thread the feerate value through ProcessNewPackage to
reject individual transactions that exceed the given
feerate. This allows subpackage processing, and is
compatible with future package RBF work.
567cec9a05e1261e955535f734826b12341684b6 doc: add release notes and help text for unix sockets (Matthew Zipkin)
bfe51928911daf484ae07deb52a7ff0bcb2526ae test: cover UNIX sockets in feature_proxy.py (Matthew Zipkin)
c65c0d01630b44fa71321ea7ad68d5f9fbb7aefb init: allow UNIX socket path for -proxy and -onion (Matthew Zipkin)
c3bd43142eba77dcf1acd4984e437759f65e237a gui: accomodate unix socket Proxy in updateDefaultProxyNets() (Matthew Zipkin)
a88bf9dedd1d8c1db0a9c8b663dab3e3c2f0f030 i2p: construct Session with Proxy instead of CService (Matthew Zipkin)
d9318a37ec09fe0b002815a7e48710e530620ae2 net: split ConnectToSocket() from ConnectDirectly() for unix sockets (Matthew Zipkin)
ac2ecf3182fb5ad9bcd41540b19382376114d6ee proxy: rename randomize_credentials to m_randomize_credentials (Matthew Zipkin)
a89c3f59dc44eaf4f59912c1accfc0ce5d61933a netbase: extend Proxy class to wrap UNIX socket as well as TCP (Matthew Zipkin)
3a7d6548effa6cd9a4a5413b690c2fd85da4ef65 net: move CreateSock() calls from ConnectNode() to netbase methods (Matthew Zipkin)
74f568cb6fd5c74b7b9bf0ce69876430746a53b1 netbase: allow CreateSock() to create UNIX sockets if supported (Matthew Zipkin)
bae86c8d318d06818aa75a9ebe3db864197f0bc6 netbase: refactor CreateSock() to accept sa_family_t (Matthew Zipkin)
adb3a3e51de205cc69b1a58647c65c04fa6c6362 configure: test for unix domain sockets (Matthew Zipkin)
Pull request description:
Closes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27252
UNIX domain sockets are a mechanism for inter-process communication that are faster than local TCP ports (because there is no need for TCP overhead) and potentially more secure because access is managed by the filesystem instead of serving an open port on the system.
There has been work on [unix domain sockets before](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9979) but for now I just wanted to start on this single use-case which is enabling unix sockets from the client side, specifically connecting to a local Tor proxy (Tor can listen on unix sockets and even enforces strict curent-user-only access permission before binding) configured by `-onion=` or `-proxy=`
I copied the prefix `unix:` usage from Tor. With this patch built locally you can test with your own filesystem path (example):
`tor --SocksPort unix:/Users/matthewzipkin/torsocket/x`
`bitcoind -proxy=unix:/Users/matthewzipkin/torsocket/x`
Prep work for this feature includes:
- Moving where and how we create `sockaddr` and `Sock` to accommodate `AF_UNIX` without disturbing `CService`
- Expanding `Proxy` class to represent either a `CService` or a UNIX socket (by its file path)
Future work:
- Enable UNIX sockets for ZMQ (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27679)
- Enable UNIX sockets for I2P SAM proxy (some code is included in this PR but not tested or exposed to user options yet)
- Enable UNIX sockets on windows where supported
- Update Network Proxies dialog in GUI to support UNIX sockets
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-ACK 567cec9a05e1261e955535f734826b12341684b6
tdb3:
re ACK for 567cec9a05e1261e955535f734826b12341684b6.
achow101:
ACK 567cec9a05e1261e955535f734826b12341684b6
vasild:
ACK 567cec9a05e1261e955535f734826b12341684b6
Tree-SHA512: de81860e56d5de83217a18df4c35297732b4ad491e293a0153d2d02a0bde1d022700a1131279b187ef219651487537354b9d06d10fde56225500c7e257df92c1
0a533613fb44207053796fd01a9f4b523a3153d4 docs: add release notes for #27114 (brunoerg)
e6b8f19de9a6d1c477d0bbda18d17794cd81a6f4 test: add coverage for whitelisting manual connections (brunoerg)
c985eb854cc86deb747caea5283c17cf51b6a983 test: add option to speed up tx relay/mempool sync (brunoerg)
66bc6e2d1749f43d7b314aa2784a06af78440170 Accept "in" and "out" flags to -whitelist to allow whitelisting manual connections (Luke Dashjr)
8e06be347c5e14cbe75256eba170e0867f95f360 net_processing: Move extra service flag into InitializeNode (Luke Dashjr)
9133fd69a5cc9a0ab1a06a60d09f1b7e1039018e net: Move `NetPermissionFlags::Implicit` verification to `AddWhitelistPermissionFlags` (Luke Dashjr)
2863d7dddb62d987b3e1c3b8bfad7083f0f774b2 net: store `-whitelist{force}relay` values in `CConnman` (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
Revives #17167. It allows whitelisting manual connections. Fixes#9923
Since there are some PRs/issues around this topic, I'll list some motivations/comments for whitelisting outbound connections from them:
- Speed-up tx relay/mempool sync for testing purposes (my personal motivation for this) - In #26970, theStack pointed out that we whitelist peers to speed up tx relay for fast mempool synchronization, however, since it applies only for inbound connections and considering the topology `node0 <--- node1 <---- node2 <--- ... <-- nodeN`, if a tx is submitted from any node other than node0, the mempool synchronization can take quite long.
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29058#issuecomment-1865155764 - "Before enabling -v2transport by default (which I'd image may happen after https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24748) we could consider a way to force manual connections to be only-v1 or even only-v2 (disabling reconnect-with-v1). A possibility could be through a net permission flag, if https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27114 makes it in."
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17167#issuecomment-1168606032 - "This would allow us to use https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25355 when making outgoing connections to all nodes, except to whitelisted ones for which we would use our persistent I2P address."
- Force-relay/mempool permissions for a node you intentionally connected to.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 0a533613fb44207053796fd01a9f4b523a3153d4
sr-gi:
re-ACK [0a53361](0a533613fb)
pinheadmz:
ACK 0a533613fb44207053796fd01a9f4b523a3153d4
Tree-SHA512: 97a79bb854110da04540897d2619eda409d829016aafdf1825ab5515334b0b42ef82f33cd41587af235b3af6ddcec3f2905ca038b5ab22e4c8a03d34f27aebe1
