576bee88fd36e207b7288077626947a1fce0fc33 fuzz: disable BnB when SFFO is enabled (furszy)
05e5ff194c7722b4ebc2b9309fc0bf47b3cf1df7 test: add coverage for BnB-SFFO restriction (furszy)
0c5755761c3e544547899ad096121585dffa73df wallet: create tx, log resulting coin selection info (furszy)
5cea25ba795d6eb9ccc721d01560783ae576af34 wallet: skip BnB when SFFO is active (Murch)
Pull request description:
Solves #28918. Coming from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28918#issuecomment-1838626406 discussion.
The intention is to decouple only the bugfix relevant commits from #28985, allowing them to be included in the 26.x release. This way, we can avoid disabling the coin selection fuzzing test for an entire release.
Note:
Have introduced few changes to the bug fix commit so that the unit tests pass without the additional burden introduced in #28985.
ACKs for top commit:
josibake:
ACK 576bee88fd
murchandamus:
ACK 576bee88fd
achow101:
ACK 576bee88fd36e207b7288077626947a1fce0fc33
Tree-SHA512: f5d90eb3f3f524265afe4719495c9bf30f98b9af26cf039f7df5a7db977abae72caa7a3478cdd0ab10cd143bc1662e8fc5286b5bc10fc10f0dd582a45b45c31a
bd7f5d33e3b9e01cd600afe1682b7afa935f68a3 wallet: Assert that the wallet is not initialized in LoadWallet (Andrew Chow)
fb0b6ca4e5d981cf58bf23ae2993117f171608e8 tests, bench: Remove incorrect LoadWallet() calls (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
`CWallet::LoadWallet()` expects to be called after a `CWallet` is constructed, but before any of its member functions called. Doing so invalidates pointers which causes issues with some PRs and branches that I am working on. This was being used incorrectly in a few tests and benchmarks, resulting in segfaults.
As a precaution for this kind of issue in the future, I've also added a few asserts to `LoadWallet()` so that developers will notice when it is used incorrectly.
As similar issue was fixed in #27666
ACKs for top commit:
S3RK:
ACK bd7f5d33e3b9e01cd600afe1682b7afa935f68a3
furszy:
ACK bd7f5d33
Tree-SHA512: 7664f12b8452994e7fc4d7d4f77697fb5f75edb0dba95ba99a4a23ec03d5b8e0ecbdcb7635547a0e8b4f89f708f98dcb5d039df0559e24b1ae411ed630e16e14
Verify the transaction creation process does not produce
a BnB solution when SFFO is enabled.
This is currently problematic because it could require a
change output. And BnB is specialized on changeless solutions.
Co-authored-by: Andrew Chow <achow101@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Murch <murch@murch.one>
LoadWallet() must only be called immediately after a CWallet is
constructed, or not at all. Doing so after any other CWallet member
functions have been called may cause pointers and other objects
setup by other those functions to become invalidated.
Since these tests and benchmarks are using completely new wallets with
mock databases, it's not necessary to call LoadWallet() anyways, so
these can be dropped.
Instead of using the output parameters, return CreatedTransactionResult
from FundTransaction in the same way that CreateTransaction does.
Additionally, instead of modifying the original CMutableTransaction, the
result from CreateTransactionInternal is used.
Instead of having a separate CCoinControl::SelectExternal function, we
can use the normal CCoinControl::Select function and explicitly use
PreselectedInput::SetTxOut in the caller. The semantics of what an
external input is remains.
Also, add missing includes to scriptpubkeyman.
Also, export dependecies of the BasicTestingSetup from setup_common.h,
to avoid having to include them when setup_common.h is already included.
fa79a881ce0537e1d74da296a7513730438d2a02 refactor: P2P transport without serialize version and type (MarcoFalke)
fa9b5f4fe32c0cfe2e477bb11912756f84a52cfe refactor: NetMsg::Make() without nVersion (MarcoFalke)
66669da4a5ca9edf2a40d20879d9a8aaf2b9e2ee Remove unused Make() overload in netmessagemaker.h (MarcoFalke)
fa0ed0794161d937d2d3385963c1aa5624b60d17 refactor: VectorWriter without nVersion (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Now that the serialize framework ignores the serialize version and serialize type, everything related to it can be removed from the code.
This is the first step, removing dead code from the P2P stack. A different pull will remove it from the wallet and other parts.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
reACK fa79a881ce0537e1d74da296a7513730438d2a02
Tree-SHA512: 785b413580d980f51f0d4f70ea5e0a99ce14cd12cb065393de2f5254891be94a14f4266110c8b87bd2dbc37467676655bce13bdb295ab139749fcd8b61bd5110
9e58c5bcd96e7ff2062274868814ccae0626589e Use Txid in COutpoint (dergoegge)
Pull request description:
This PR changes the type of the hash of a transaction outpoint from `uint256` to `Txid`.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
ACK 9e58c5bcd96e7ff2062274868814ccae0626589e
stickies-v:
ACK 9e58c5bcd96e7ff2062274868814ccae0626589e. A sizeable diff, but very straightforward changes. Didn't see anything controversial. Left a few nits, but nothing blocking, only if you have to retouch.
TheCharlatan:
ACK 9e58c5bcd96e7ff2062274868814ccae0626589e
Tree-SHA512: 58f61ce1c58668f689513e62072a7775419c4d5af8f607669cd8cdc2e7be9645ba14af7f9e2d65da2670da3ec1ce7fc2a744037520caf799aba212fd1ac44b34
This should fix the bug reported in
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28246#discussion_r1371640502,
which caused the GUI to not detect the destination type of recipients,
thus picking the wrong change destination type.
Also, add missing lifetimebound attribute to a getter method.
edbed31066e3674ba52b8c093ab235625527f383 chainparams: add signet assumeutxo param at height 160_000 (Sjors Provoost)
b8cafe38713cbf10d15459042f7f911bcc1b1e4e chainparams: add testnet assumeutxo param at height 2_500_000 (Sjors Provoost)
99839bbfa7110c7abf22e587ae2f72c9c57d3c85 doc: add note about confusing HaveTxsDownloaded name (James O'Beirne)
7ee46a755f1d57ce9d51975d3b54dc9ac3d08d52 contrib: add script to demo/test assumeutxo (James O'Beirne)
42cae39356fd20d521aaf99aff1ed85856f3c9f3 test: add feature_assumeutxo functional test (James O'Beirne)
0f64bac6030334d798ae205cd7af4bf248feddd9 rpc: add getchainstates (James O'Beirne)
bb0585779472962f40d9cdd9c6532132850d371c refuse to activate a UTXO snapshot if mempool not empty (James O'Beirne)
ce585a9a158476b0ad3296477b922e79f308e795 rpc: add loadtxoutset (James O'Beirne)
62ac519e718eb7a31dca1102a96ba219fbc7f95d validation: do not activate snapshot if behind active chain (James O'Beirne)
9511fb3616b7bbe1d0d2f54a45ea0a650ba0367b validation: assumeutxo: swap m_mempool on snapshot activation (James O'Beirne)
7fcd21544a333ffdf1910b65c573579860be6a36 blockstorage: segment normal/assumedvalid blockfiles (James O'Beirne)
4c3b8ca35c2e4a441264749bb312df2bd054b5b8 validation: populate nChainTx value for assumedvalid chainstates (James O'Beirne)
49ef778158c43859946a592e11ec34fe1b93a5b6 test: adjust chainstate tests to use recognized snapshot base (James O'Beirne)
1019c399825b0d512c1fd751c376d46fed4992b9 validation: pruning for multiple chainstates (James O'Beirne)
373cf91531b84bfdd06fdf8abf4dca228029ce6b validation: indexing changes for assumeutxo (James O'Beirne)
1fffdd76a1bca908f55d73b64983655b14cf7432 net_processing: validationinterface: ignore some events for bg chain (James O'Beirne)
fbe0a7d7ca680358237b6c2369b3fd2b43221113 wallet: validationinterface: only handle active chain notifications (James O'Beirne)
f073917a9e7ba423643dcae0339776470b628f65 validationinterface: only send zmq notifications for active (James O'Beirne)
4d8f4dcb450d31e4847804e62bf91545b949fa14 validation: pass ChainstateRole for validationinterface calls (James O'Beirne)
1e59acdf17309f567c370885f0cf02605e2baa58 validation: only call UpdatedBlockTip for active chainstate (James O'Beirne)
c6af23c5179cc383f8e6c275373af8d11e6a989f validation: add ChainstateRole (James O'Beirne)
9f2318c76cc6986d48e13831cf5bd8dab194fdf4 validation: MaybeRebalanceCaches when chain leaves IBD (James O'Beirne)
434495a8c1496ca23fe35b84499f3daf668d76b8 chainparams: add blockhash to AssumeutxoData (James O'Beirne)
c711ca186f8d8a28810be0beedcb615ddcf93163 assumeutxo: remove snapshot during -reindex{-chainstate} (James O'Beirne)
c93ef43e4fd4fbc1263cdc9e98ae5856830fe89e bugfix: correct is_snapshot_cs in VerifyDB (James O'Beirne)
b73d3bbd23220857bf17cbb6401275bf58013b72 net_processing: Request assumeutxo background chain blocks (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
- Background and FAQ: https://github.com/jamesob/assumeutxo-docs/tree/2019-04-proposal/proposal
- Prior progress/project: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/11
- Replaces https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15606, which was closed due to Github slowness. Original description and commentary can be found there.
---
This changeset finishes the first phase of the assumeutxo project. It makes UTXO snapshots loadable via RPC (`loadtxoutset`) and adds `assumeutxo` parameters to chainparams. It contains all the remaining changes necessary to both use an assumedvalid snapshot chainstate and do a full validation sync in the background.
This may look like a lot to review, but note that
- ~200 lines are a (non-essential) demo shell script
- Many lines are functional test, documentation, and relatively dilute RPC code.
So it shouldn't be as burdensome to review as the linecount might suggest.
- **P2P**: minor changes are made to `init.cpp` and `net_processing.cpp` to make simultaneous IBD across multiple chainstates work.
- **Pruning**: implement correct pruning behavior when using a background chainstate
- **Blockfile separation**: to prevent "fragmentation" in blockfile storage, have background chainstates use separate blockfiles from active snapshot chainstates to avoid interleaving heights and impairing pruning.
- **Indexing**: some `CValidationInterface` events are given with an additional parameter, ChainstateRole, and all indexers ignore events from ChainstateRole::ASSUMEDVALID so that indexation only happens sequentially.
- Have `-reindex` properly wipe snapshot chainstates.
- **RPC**: introduce RPC commands `loadtxoutset` and (hidden) `getchainstates`.
- **Release docs & first assumeutxo commitment**: add notes and a particular assumeutxo hash value for first AU-enabled release.
- This will complete the project and allow use of UTXO snapshots for faster node bootstrap.
The next phase, if it were to be pursued, would be coming up with a way to distribute the UTXO snapshots over the P2P network.
---
### UTXO snapshots
Create your own with `./contrib/devtools/utxo_snapshot.sh`, e.g.
```shell
./contrib/devtools/utxo_snapshot.sh 788000 utxo.dat ./src/bitcoin-cli -datadir=$(pwd)/testdata`)
```
or use the pre-generated ones listed below.
- Testnet: **2'500'000** (Sjors):
- torrent: `magnet:?xt=urn:btih:511e09f4bf853aefab00de5c070b1e031f0ecbe9&dn=utxo-testnet-2500000.dat&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.bitcoin.sprovoost.nl%3A6969`
- sha256: `79db4b025448cc0ac388d8589a28eab02de53055d181e34eb47391717aa16388`
- Signet: **160'000** (Sjors):
- torrent: `magnet:?xt=urn:btih:9da986cb27b3980ea7fd06b21e199b148d486880&dn=utxo-signet-160000.dat&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.bitcoin.sprovoost.nl%3A6969`
- sha256: `eeeca845385ba91e84ef58c09d38f98f246a24feadaad57fe1e5874f3f92ef8c`
- Mainnet: **800'000** (Sjors):
- Note: this needs the following commit cherry-picked in: 24deb2022b
- torrent: `magnet:?xt=urn:btih:50ee955bef37f5ec3e5b0df4cf0288af3d715a2e&dn=utxo-800000.dat&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.bitcoin.sprovoost.nl%3A6969`
### Testing
#### For fun (~5min)
If you want to do a quick test, you can run `./contrib/devtools/test_utxo_snapshots.sh` and follow the instructions. This is mostly obviated by the functional tests, though.
#### For real (longer)
If you'd like to experience a real usage of assumeutxo, you can do that too.
I've cut a new snapshot at height 788'000 (http://img.jameso.be/utxo-788000.dat - but you can do it yourself with `./contrib/devtools/utxo_snapshot.sh` if you want). Download that, and then create a datadir for testing:
```sh
$ cd ~/src/bitcoin # or whatever
# get the snapshot
$ curl http://img.jameso.be/utxo-788000.dat > utxo-788000.dat
# you'll want to do this if you like copy/pasting
$ export AU_DATADIR=/home/${USER}/au-test # or wherever
$ mkdir ${AU_DATADIR}
$ vim ${AU_DATADIR}/bitcoin.conf
dbcache=8000 # or, you know, something high
blockfilterindex=1
coinstatsindex=1
prune=3000
logthreadnames=1
```
Obtain this branch, build it, and then start bitcoind:
```sh
$ git remote add jamesob https://github.com/jamesob/bitcoin
$ git fetch jamesob assumeutxo
$ git checkout jamesob/assumeutxo
$ ./configure $conf_args && make # (whatever you like to do here)
# start 'er up and watch the logs
$ ./src/bitcoind -datadir=${AU_DATADIR}
```
Then, in some other window, load the snapshot
```sh
$ ./src/bitcoin-cli -datadir=${AU_DATADIR} loadtxoutset $(pwd)/utxo-788000.dat
```
You'll see some log messages about headers retrieval and waiting to see the snapshot in the headers chain. Once you get the full headers chain, you'll spend a decent amount of time (~10min) loading the snapshot, checking it, and flushing it to disk. After all that happens, you should be syncing to tip in pretty short order, and you'll see the occasional `[background validation]` log message go by.
In yet another window, you can check out chainstate status with
```sh
$ ./src/bitcoin-cli -datadir=${AU_DATADIR} getchainstates
```
as well as usual favorites like `getblockchaininfo`.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK edbed31066e3674ba52b8c093ab235625527f383
Tree-SHA512: 6086fb9a38dc7df85fedc76b30084dd8154617a2a91e89a84fb41326d34ef8e7d7ea593107afba01369093bf8cc91770621d98f0ea42a5b3b99db868d2f14dc2
fac29a0ab19fda457b55d7a0a37c5cd3d9680f82 Remove SER_GETHASH, hard-code client version in CKeyPool serialize (MarcoFalke)
fa72f09d6ff8ee204f331a69d3f5e825223c9e11 Remove CHashWriter type (MarcoFalke)
fa4a9c0f4334678fb80358ead667807bf2a0a153 Remove unused GetType() from OverrideStream, CVectorWriter, SpanReader (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Removes a bunch of redundant, dead or duplicate code.
Uses the idea from and finishes the idea https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28428 by theuni
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK fac29a0ab19fda457b55d7a0a37c5cd3d9680f82
kevkevinpal:
added one nit but otherwise ACK [fac29a0](fac29a0ab1)
Tree-SHA512: cc805e2f38e73869a6691fdb5da09fa48524506b87fc93f05d32c336ad3033425a2d7608e317decd3141fde3f084403b8de280396c0c39132336fe0f7510af9e
ad0c469d98c51931b98b7fd937c6ac3eeaed024e wallet: Use CTxDestination in CRecipient rather than scriptPubKey (Andrew Chow)
07d3bdf4ebc06825ea24ab6f7c87aef6a22238c6 Add PubKeyDestination for P2PK scripts (Andrew Chow)
1a98a51c666e9ae77364115775ec2e0ba984e8e0 Allow CNoDestination to represent a raw script (Andrew Chow)
8dd067088d41f021b357d7db5fa5f0a9f61edddc Make WitnessUnknown members private (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
For silent payments, we want to provide a `SilentPaymentsDestination` to be used as the recipient, which requires `CRecipient` to use something other than just the `scriptPubKey` as we cannot know the output script for a silent payment prior to transaction creation. `CTxDestination` seems like the obvious place to add a `SilentPaymentsDestination` as it is our internal representation of an address.
In order to still allow paying to arbitrary scriptPubKeys (e.g. for data carrier outputs, or the user hand crafted a raw transaction that they have given to `fundrawtransaction`), `CNoDestination` is changed to contain raw scripts.
Additionally, P2PK scripts are now interpreted as a new `PubKeyDestination` rather than `PKHash`. This results in some things that would have given an address for P2PK scripts to no longer do so. This is arguably more correct.
`ExtractDestination`'s behavior is slightly changed for the above. It now returns `true` for those destinations that have addresses, so P2PK scripts now result in `false`. Even though it returns false for `CNoDestination`, the script will now be included in that `CNoDestination`.
Builds on #28244
ACKs for top commit:
josibake:
ACK ad0c469d98
Tree-SHA512: ef3f8f3c7284779d9806c77c85b21caf910a79a1f7e7f1b51abcc0d7e074f14e00abf30f625a13075e41d94dad6202c10ddff462c0ee74c2ca4aab585b145a52
f18f9ef4d31c70e2d71ab90a24511692821418c3 Amend bumpfee for inputs with overlapping ancestry (Murch)
2e35e944dab09eff30952233f8dfc0b12c4553d5 Bump unconfirmed parent txs to target feerate (Murch)
3e3e05241128f68cf12f73ee06ff997395643885 coinselection: Move GetSelectionWaste into SelectionResult (Andrew Chow)
c57889da6650715f3e1153b6104bbdae15fcac90 [node] interface to get bump fees (glozow)
c24851be945b2a633ee44ed3c8a501eee5580b62 Make MiniMinerMempoolEntry fields private (Murch)
ac6030e4d8f7d578cd4a8593f41189efca548064 Remove unused imports (Murch)
d2f90c31ef3b8dee5a3e0804ecc62fa1cfec7cd5 Fix calculation of ancestor set feerates in test (Murch)
a1f7d986e0211e54e21a1d4a570e5f15294dca72 Match tx names to index in miniminer overlap test (Murch)
Pull request description:
Includes some commits to address follow-ups from #27021: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27021#issuecomment-1554675156
Reduces the effective value of unconfirmed UTXOs by the fees necessary to bump their ancestor transactions to the same feerate.
While the individual UTXOs always account for their full ancestry before coin-selection, we can correct potential overestimates with a second pass where we establish the ancestry and bump fee for the whole input set collectively.
Fixes#9645Fixes#9864Fixes#15553
ACKs for top commit:
S3RK:
ACK f18f9ef4d31c70e2d71ab90a24511692821418c3
ismaelsadeeq:
ACK f18f9ef4d31c70e2d71ab90a24511692821418c3
achow101:
ACK f18f9ef4d31c70e2d71ab90a24511692821418c3
brunoerg:
crACK f18f9ef4d31c70e2d71ab90a24511692821418c3
t-bast:
ACK f18f9ef4d3, I reviewed the latest changes and run e2e tests against eclair, everything looks good 👍
Tree-SHA512: b65180c4243b1f9d13c311ada7a1c9f2f055d530d6c533b78c2068b50b8c29ac1321e89e85675b15515760d4f1b653ebd9da77b37c7be52d9bc565a3538f0aa6
When a transaction uses an unconfirmed input, preceding this commit it
would not consider the feerate of the parent transaction. Given a parent
transaction with a lower ancestor feerate, this resulted in the new
transaction's ancestor feerate undershooting the target feerate.
This commit changes how we calculate the effective value of unconfirmed UTXOs.
The effective value of unconfirmed UTXOs is decreased by the fee
necessary to bump its ancestry to the target feerate. This also impacts
the calculation of the waste metric: since the estimate for the current
fee is increased by the bump fees, unconfirmed UTXOs current fees appear less
favorable compared to their unchanged long term fees.
This has one caveat: if multiple UTXOs have overlapping ancestries, each
of their individual estimates will account for bumping all ancestors.
GetSelectionWaste will need to access more context within a selection
result, and so should be a private member function rather than a static
function. It's only use outside of SelectionResult was for tests which
have now been updated to just make a SelectionResult.
Co-authored-by: Murch <murch@murch.one>
10546a569c6c96a5ec1b9708abf9ff5c8644f669 wallet: accurately account for the size of the witness stack (Antoine Poinsot)
9b7ec393b82ca9d7ada77d06e0835df0386a8b85 wallet: use descriptor satisfaction size to estimate inputs size (Antoine Poinsot)
8d870a98731e8db5ecc614bb5f7c064cbf30c7f4 script/signingprovider: introduce a MultiSigningProvider (Antoine Poinsot)
fa7c46b503f0b69630f55dc43021d2099e3515ba descriptor: introduce a method to get the satisfaction size (Antoine Poinsot)
bdba7667d2d65f31484760a8e8420c488fc5f801 miniscript: introduce a helper to get the maximum witness size (Antoine Poinsot)
4ab382c2cdb09fb4056711b4336807845cbe1ad5 miniscript: make GetStackSize independent of P2WSH context (Antoine Poinsot)
Pull request description:
The wallet currently estimates the size of a signed input by doing a dry run of the signing logic. This is unnecessary since all outputs we can sign for can be represented by a descriptor, and we can derive the size of a satisfaction ("signature") directly from the descriptor itself.
In addition, the current approach does not generalize well: dry runs of the signing logic are only possible for the most basic scripts. See for instance the discussion in #24149 around that.
This introduces a method to get the maximum size of a satisfaction from a descriptor, and makes the wallet use that instead of the dry-run.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK 10546a569c6c96a5ec1b9708abf9ff5c8644f669
achow101:
re-ACK 10546a569c6c96a5ec1b9708abf9ff5c8644f669
Tree-SHA512: 43ed1529fbd30af709d903c8c5063235e8c6a03b500bc8f144273d6184e23a53edf0fea9ef898ed57d8a40d73208b5d935cc73b94a24fad3ad3c63b3b2027174
When estimating the maximum size of an input, we were assuming the
number of elements on the witness stack could be encode in a single
byte. This is a valid approximation for all the descriptors we support
(including P2WSH Miniscript ones), but may not hold anymore once we
support Miniscript within Taproot descriptors (since the max standard
witness stack size of 100 gets lifted).
It's a low-hanging fruit to account for it correctly, so just do it now.
Instead of using the dummysigner to compute a placeholder satisfaction,
infer a descriptor on the scriptPubKey of the coin being spent and use
the estimation of the satisfaction size given by the descriptor
directly.
Note this (almost, see next paragraph) exactly conserves the previous
behaviour. For instance CalculateMaximumSignedInputSize was previously
assuming the input to be spent in a transaction that spends at least one
Segwit coin, since it was always accounting for the serialization of the
number of witness elements.
In this commit we use a placeholder for the size of the serialization of
the witness stack size (1 byte). Since the logic in this commit is
already tricky enough to review, and that it is only a very tiny
approximation not observable through the existing tests, it is addressed
in the next commit.
In the wallet code, we are currently estimating the size of a signed
input by doing a dry run of the signing logic. This is unnecessary as
all outputs we are able to sign for can be represented by a descriptor,
and we can derive the size of a satisfaction ("signature") from the
descriptor itself directly.
In addition, this approach does not scale: getting the size of a
satisfaction through a dry run of the signing logic is only possible for
the most basic scripts.
This commit introduces the computation of the size of satisfaction per
descriptor. It's a bit intricate for 2 main reasons:
- We want to conserve the behaviour of the current dry-run logic used by
the wallet that sometimes assumes ECDSA signatures will be low-r,
sometimes not (when we don't create them).
- We need to account for the witness discount. A single descriptor may
sometimes benefit of it, sometimes not (for instance `pk()` if used as
top-level versus if used inside `wsh()`).
bf26f978ffbe7e2fc681825de631600e24e5c93e fuzz: coinselection, fix `m_cost_of_change` (brunoerg)
6d9b26d56ab5295dfcfe0f80a3069046a263fb2f fuzz: coinselection, BnB should never produce change (brunoerg)
b2eb55840778515d61465acc8106b27e16af1c88 fuzz: coinselection, compare `GetSelectedValue` with target (brunoerg)
0df0438c60e27df1aced6d31a192d6f334cef2d1 fuzz: coinselection, improve `ComputeAndSetWaste` (brunoerg)
1e351e5db1ced6a32681ceea8a111148bd83e323 fuzz: coinselection, add coverage for `Merge` (brunoerg)
f0244a8614ee35caef03bc326519823972ec61b4 fuzz: coinselection, add coverage for `GetShuffledInputVector`/`GetInputSet` (brunoerg)
808618b8a25b1d9cfc4e4f1a5b4c6fff02972396 fuzz: coinselection, add coverage for `AddInputs` (brunoerg)
90c4e6a241eee605809ab1b4331e620b92f05933 fuzz: coinselection, add coverage for `EligibleForSpending` (brunoerg)
2a031cb2c218e288a9784d677705a7d2bc1c2d2b fuzz: coinselection, add `CreateCoins` (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR:
- Moves coin creation to its own function called `CreateCoins`.
- Add coverage for `EligibleForSpending`
- Add coverage for `AddInputs`: get result of each algorithm (srd, knapsack and bnb), call `CreateCoins` and add into them.
- Add coverage for `GetShuffledInputVector` and `GetInputSet` using the result of each algorithm (srd, knapsack and bnb).
- Add coverage for `Merge`: Call SRD with the new utxos and, if successful, try to merge with the previous SRD result.
ACKs for top commit:
murchandamus:
reACK with some minimal fuzzing bf26f978ffbe7e2fc681825de631600e24e5c93e
achow101:
ACK bf26f978ffbe7e2fc681825de631600e24e5c93e
furszy:
re-ACK bf26f97
Tree-SHA512: bdd2b0a39de37be0a9b21a7c51260b6b8abe538cc0ea74312eb658b90a121a1ae07306c09fb0e75e93b531ce9ea2402feb041b0d852902d07739257f792e64ab
The valid results should have a target below the sum of
the selected inputs amounts. Also, it increases the
minimum value for target to make it more realistic.
Instead of using `cost_of_change` for `min_viable_change`
and `change_cost`, and 0 for `change_fee`, use values from
`coin_params`. The previous values don't generate any effects
that is relevant for that context.
