4912 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
merge-script
94ddc2dced
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#34113: refactor: [rpc] Remove confusing and brittle integral casts
fa66e2d07a4b87d62382a54acf5fab6af77be24e refactor: [rpc] Remove confusing and brittle integral casts (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  When constructing an UniValue from integral values, historically (long ago), in some cases casts where needed. With the current UniValue constructor, only very few are actually needed.

  Keeping the unused casts around is:

  * confusing, because code readers do not understand why they are needed
  * brittle, because some may copy them into new places, where they will lead to hard-to-find logic bugs, such as the ones fixed in pull https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/34112

  So fix all issues by removing them, except for a few cases, where casting was required:
  * `ret.pushKV("coinbase", static_cast<bool>(coin->fCoinBase));`, or
  * `static_cast<std::underlying_type_t<decltype(info.nServices)>>(info.nServices)`.

  This hardening refactor does not fix any bugs and does not change any behavior.

ACKs for top commit:
  sedited:
    ACK fa66e2d07a4b87d62382a54acf5fab6af77be24e
  rkrux:
    ACK fa66e2d07a4b87d62382a54acf5fab6af77be24e

Tree-SHA512: 13c9c59ad021ea03cdabe10d58850cef96d792634c499e62227cc2e7e5cace066ebd9a8ef3f979eaba98cadf8a525c6e6df909a07115559c0450bd9fc3a9763e
2025-12-27 16:35:21 +00:00
David Gumberg
11ce5cf799 scripted-diff: refactor: wallet: Delete IsCrypted
This function is a duplicate of HasEncryptionKeys().

-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i '/bool IsCrypted() const;/d' src/wallet/wallet.h
sed -i '/^bool CWallet::IsCrypted() const$/,/^}$/{/^}$/N;d;}' src/wallet/wallet.cpp
sed -i --regexp-extended 's/IsCrypted\(\)/HasEncryptionKeys()/g' $(git ls-files '*.cpp' '*.h')
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
2025-12-24 11:09:15 -08:00
Ava Chow
25636500c2
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#32737: rpc, doc: clarify the response of listtransactions RPC
1ed8e7616527c69dbaa9904cda59e3b73c29fa5d rpc, doc: clarify the response of listtransactions RPC (rkrux)

Pull request description:

  I noticed this behaviour while perf testing PR #27286 and it was not something that I expected, updating the doc to make it present in the RPCHelp command.

ACKs for top commit:
  achow101:
    ACK 1ed8e7616527c69dbaa9904cda59e3b73c29fa5d
  furszy:
    ACK 1ed8e7616527c69dbaa9904cda59e3b73c29fa5d
  musaHaruna:
    ACK [1ed8e76](1ed8e76165) since my last review. New changes looks good, it's much easier to understand as well, looking at it  from a user's perspective.

Tree-SHA512: 893a8e259201ac2140f46f827d81e681d2ec478c9571cceb10864aaa1b941991ce2263357d7c2b0024c04a9f8fbc372a020104b26e022c96289d271675947033
2025-12-22 15:12:07 -08:00
merge-script
7f295e1d9b
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#34084: scripted-diff: [doc] Unify stale copyright headers
fa4cb13b52030c2e55c6bea170649ab69d75f758 test: [doc] Manually unify stale headers (MarcoFalke)
fa5f29774872d18febc0df38831a6e45f3de69cc scripted-diff: [doc] Unify stale copyright headers (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  Historically, the upper year range in file headers was bumped manually
  or with a script.

  This has many issues:

  * The script is causing churn. See for example commit 306ccd4, or
    drive-by first-time contributions bumping them one-by-one. (A few from
    this year: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32008,
    https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31642,
    https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32963, ...)
  * Some, or likely most, upper year values were wrong. Reasons for
    incorrect dates could be code moves, cherry-picks, or simply bugs in
    the script.
  * The upper range is not needed for anything.
  * Anyone who wants to find the initial file creation date, or file
    history, can use `git log` or `git blame` to get more accurate
    results.
  * Many places are already using the `-present` suffix, with the meaning
    that the upper range is omitted.

  To fix all issues, this bumps the upper range of the copyright headers
  to `-present`.

  Further notes:

  * Obviously, the yearly 4-line bump commit for the build system (c.f.
    b537a2c02a9921235d1ecf8c3c7dc1836ec68131) is fine and will remain.
  * For new code, the date range can be fully omitted, as it is done
    already by some developers. Obviously, developers are free to pick
    whatever style they want. One can list the commits for each style.
  * For example, to list all commits that use `-present`:
    `git log --format='%an (%ae) [%h: %s]' -S 'present The Bitcoin'`.
  * Alternatively, to list all commits that use no range at all:
    `git log --format='%an (%ae) [%h: %s]' -S '(c) The Bitcoin'`.

  <!--
  * The lower range can be wrong as well, so it could be omitted as well,
    but this is left for a follow-up. A previous attempt was in
    https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26817.

ACKs for top commit:
  l0rinc:
    ACK fa4cb13b52030c2e55c6bea170649ab69d75f758
  rkrux:
    re-ACK fa4cb13b52030c2e55c6bea170649ab69d75f758
  janb84:
    ACK fa4cb13b52030c2e55c6bea170649ab69d75f758

Tree-SHA512: e5132781bdc4417d1e2922809b27ef4cf0abb37ffb68c65aab8a5391d3c917b61a18928ec2ec2c75ef5184cb79a5b8c8290d63e949220dbeab3bd2c0dfbdc4c5
2025-12-19 16:56:02 +00:00
MarcoFalke
fa66e2d07a
refactor: [rpc] Remove confusing and brittle integral casts 2025-12-19 16:20:12 +01:00
Lőrinc
1e94e562f7
refactor: enable readability-container-contains clang-tidy rule
Replace the last few instances of `.count() != 0` and `.count() == 0` and `.count()` patterns with the more expressive C++20 `.contains()` method:

* `std::set<std::string>` in `getblocktemplate` RPC;
* `std::map<std::string, ...>` in `transaction_tests`;
* other bare `std::unordered_set` and `std::map` count calls.

With no remaining violations, enable the `readability-container-contains`
clang-tidy check to prevent future regressions.
2025-12-18 22:38:02 +01:00
rkrux
1ed8e76165
rpc, doc: clarify the response of listtransactions RPC
I noticed this behaviour while perf testing PR 27286 and it was not something
that I expected, updating the doc to make it present in the RPCHelp command.
2025-12-18 18:40:21 +05:30
Ryan Ofsky
ab513103df
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#33192: refactor: unify container presence checks
d9319b06cf82664d55f255387a348135fd7f91c7 refactor: unify container presence checks - non-trivial counts (Lőrinc)
039307554eb311ce41648d1f9a12b543f480f871 refactor: unify container presence checks - trivial counts (Lőrinc)
8bb9219b6301215f53e43967d17445aaf1b81090 refactor: unify container presence checks - find (Lőrinc)

Pull request description:

  ### Summary
  Instead of counting occurrences in sets and maps, the C++20 `::contains` method expresses the intent unambiguously and can return early on first encounter.

  ### Context
  Applied clang‑tidy's [readability‑container‑contains](https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/readability/container-contains.html) check, though many cases required manual changes since tidy couldn't fix them automatically.

  ### Changes
  The changes made here were:

  | From                   | To               |
  |------------------------|------------------|
  | `m.find(k) == m.end()` | `!m.contains(k)` |
  | `m.find(k) != m.end()` | `m.contains(k)`  |
  | `m.count(k)`           | `m.contains(k)`  |
  | `!m.count(k)`          | `!m.contains(k)` |
  | `m.count(k) == 0`      | `!m.contains(k)` |
  | `m.count(k) != 1`      | `!m.contains(k)` |
  | `m.count(k) == 1`      | `m.contains(k)`  |
  | `m.count(k) < 1`       | `!m.contains(k)`  |
  | `m.count(k) > 0`       | `m.contains(k)`  |
  | `m.count(k) != 0`      | `m.contains(k)`  |

  > Note that `== 1`/`!= 1`/`< 1` only apply to simple [maps](https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/container/map/contains)/[sets](https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/container/set/contains) and had to be changed manually.

  There are many other cases that could have been changed, but we've reverted most of those to reduce conflict with other open PRs.

  -----

  <details>
  <summary>clang-tidy command on Mac</summary>

  ```bash
  rm -rfd build && \
  cmake -B build \
    -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$(brew --prefix llvm)/bin/clang" \
    -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$(brew --prefix llvm)/bin/clang++" \
    -DCMAKE_OSX_SYSROOT="$(xcrun --show-sdk-path)" \
    -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS="-target arm64-apple-macos11" \
    -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS="-target arm64-apple-macos11" \
    -DCMAKE_EXPORT_COMPILE_COMMANDS=ON -DBUILD_BENCH=ON -DBUILD_FUZZ_BINARY=ON -DBUILD_FOR_FUZZING=ON

   "$(brew --prefix llvm)/bin/run-clang-tidy" -quiet -p build -j$(nproc) -checks='-*,readability-container-contains' | grep -v 'clang-tidy'
  ```

  </details>

  Note: this is a take 2 of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33094 with fewer contentious changes.

ACKs for top commit:
  optout21:
    reACK d9319b06cf82664d55f255387a348135fd7f91c7
  sedited:
    ACK d9319b06cf82664d55f255387a348135fd7f91c7
  janb84:
    re ACK d9319b06cf82664d55f255387a348135fd7f91c7
  pablomartin4btc:
    re-ACK d9319b06cf82664d55f255387a348135fd7f91c7
  ryanofsky:
    Code review ACK d9319b06cf82664d55f255387a348135fd7f91c7. I manually reviewed the full change, and it seems there are a lot of positive comments about this and no more very significant conflicts, so I will merge it shortly.

Tree-SHA512: e4415221676cfb88413ccc446e5f4369df7a55b6642347277667b973f515c3c8ee5bfa9ee0022479c8de945c89fbc9ff61bd8ba086e70f30298cbc1762610fe1
2025-12-17 16:17:29 -05:00
MarcoFalke
fa5f297748
scripted-diff: [doc] Unify stale copyright headers
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-

 sed --in-place --regexp-extended \
   's;( 20[0-2][0-9])(-20[0-2][0-9])? The Bitcoin Core developers;\1-present The Bitcoin Core developers;g' \
   $( git grep -l 'The Bitcoin Core developers' -- ':(exclude)COPYING' ':(exclude)src/ipc/libmultiprocess' ':(exclude)src/minisketch' )

-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
2025-12-16 22:21:15 +01:00
merge-script
4f11ef058b
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30214: refactor: Improve assumeutxo state representation
82be652e40ec7e1bea4b260ee804a92a3e05f496 doc: Improve ChainstateManager documentation, use consistent terms (Ryan Ofsky)
af455dcb39dbd53700105e29c87de5db65ecf43c refactor: Simplify pruning functions (TheCharlatan)
ae85c495f1b507ca5871ea98f5d884fccb15adba refactor: Delete ChainstateManager::GetAll() method (Ryan Ofsky)
6a572dbda92ceb8c5af379f51cf6f9b93fb5e486 refactor: Add ChainstateManager::ActivateBestChains() method (Ryan Ofsky)
491d827d5284ed984ee2b11daaee50321217eac5 refactor: Add ChainstateManager::m_chainstates member (Ryan Ofsky)
e514fe61168109bd467d7cb2ac7561442b17b5f6 refactor: Delete ChainstateManager::SnapshotBlockhash() method (Ryan Ofsky)
ee35250683ab9a395b70a0e90ebc68b1858387c7 refactor: Delete ChainstateManager::IsSnapshotValidated() method (Ryan Ofsky)
d9e82299fc4e45fbc0f5a34dcbb1d51397d0bd35 refactor: Delete ChainstateManager::IsSnapshotActive() method (Ryan Ofsky)
4dfe383912761669a968f8535ed43437da160ec8 refactor: Convert ChainstateRole enum to struct (Ryan Ofsky)
352ad27fc1b1b350c8dbeb26a9813b01025cad31 refactor: Add ChainstateManager::ValidatedChainstate() method (Ryan Ofsky)
a229cb9477e6622087241be7a105551d1329503b refactor: Add ChainstateManager::CurrentChainstate() method (Ryan Ofsky)
a9b7f5614c24fe6f386448604c325ec4fa6c98a5 refactor: Add Chainstate::StoragePath() method (Ryan Ofsky)
840bd2ef230ed0582fe33a90ec2636bfefa21709 refactor: Pass chainstate parameters to MaybeCompleteSnapshotValidation (Ryan Ofsky)
1598a15aedb9fd9c4e4a671785ebebf56fc1e072 refactor: Deduplicate Chainstate activation code (Ryan Ofsky)
9fe927b6d654e752dac82156e209e45d31b75779 refactor: Add Chainstate m_assumeutxo and m_target_utxohash members (Ryan Ofsky)
6082c84713f42f5fa66f9a76baef17e8ed231633 refactor: Add Chainstate::m_target_blockhash member (Ryan Ofsky)
de00e87548f7ddd623355b7094924b0387a36280 test: Fix broken chainstatemanager_snapshot_init check (Ryan Ofsky)

Pull request description:

  This PR contains the first part of #28608, which tries to make assumeutxo code more maintainable, and improve it by not locking `cs_main` for a long time when the snapshot block is connected, and by deleting the snapshot validation chainstate when it is no longer used, instead of waiting until the next restart.

  The changes in this PR are just refactoring. They make `Chainstate` objects self-contained, so for example, it is possible to determine what blocks to connect to a chainstate without querying `ChainstateManager`, and to determine whether a Chainstate is validated without basing it on inferences like `&cs != &ActiveChainstate()` or `GetAll().size() == 1`.

  The PR also tries to make assumeutxo terminology less confusing, using "current chainstate" to refer to the chainstate targeting the current network tip, and "historical chainstate" to refer to the chainstate downloading old blocks and validating the assumeutxo snapshot. It removes uses of the terms "active chainstate," "usable chainstate," "disabled chainstate," "ibd chainstate," and "snapshot chainstate" which are confusing for various reasons.

ACKs for top commit:
  maflcko:
    re-review ACK 82be652e40ec7e1bea4b260ee804a92a3e05f496 🕍
  fjahr:
    re-ACK 82be652e40ec7e1bea4b260ee804a92a3e05f496
  sedited:
    Re-ACK 82be652e40ec7e1bea4b260ee804a92a3e05f496

Tree-SHA512: 81c67abba9fc5bb170e32b7bf8a1e4f7b5592315b4ef720be916d5f1f5a7088c0c59cfb697744dd385552f58aa31ee36176bae6a6e465723e65861089a1252e5
2025-12-16 14:03:34 +00:00
Ryan Ofsky
4dfe383912 refactor: Convert ChainstateRole enum to struct
Change ChainstateRole parameter passed to wallets and indexes. Wallets and
indexes need to know whether chainstate is historical and whether it is fully
validated. They should not be aware of the assumeutxo snapshot validation
process.
2025-12-12 06:49:59 -04:00
Ava Chow
4ec2d18a07 wallet, interfaces, gui: Expose load_after_restore parameter
RestoreWallet has a load_after_restore parameter, expose this to callers
using it through the wallet interface as well.
2025-12-11 12:04:27 -08:00
Ryan Ofsky
d5c8199b79
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#34006: Add util::Expected (std::expected)
faa23738fc2576e412edb04a4004fab537a3098e refactor: Enable clang-tidy bugprone-unused-return-value (MarcoFalke)
fa114be27b17ed32c1d9a7106f313a0df8755fa2 Add util::Expected (std::expected) (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  Some low-level code could benefit from being able to use `std::expected` from C++23:

  * Currently, some code is using `std::optional<E>` to denote an optional error. This is fine, but a bit confusing, because `std::optional` is normally used for values, not errors. Using `std::expected<void, E>` is clearer.
  * Currently, some code is using `std::variant<V, E>` to denote either a value or an error. This is fine, but a bit verbose, because `std::variant` requires a visitor or get_if/holds_alternative instead of a simple call of the `operator bool` for `std::expected`.

  In theory, `util::Result` could be taught to behave similar to `std::expected` (see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/34005). However, it is unclear if this is the right approach:

  * `util::Result` is mostly meant for higher level code, where errors come with translated error messages.
  * `std::expected` is mostly meant for lower level code, where errors could be an enum, or any other type.
  * https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25665 aims to minimize the memory footprint of the error by wrapping it in a unique_ptr internally. `std::expected` requires the value and error to be "nested within it" (https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue4141). So from a memory-layout perspective, the two are not compatible.
  * `std::expected` also comes with `std::unexpected`, which also does not map cleanly to `util::Result`.

  So just add a minimal drop-in port of `std::expected`.

ACKs for top commit:
  romanz:
    tACK faa23738fc
  sedited:
    Re-ACK faa23738fc2576e412edb04a4004fab537a3098e
  hodlinator:
    ACK faa23738fc2576e412edb04a4004fab537a3098e
  rkrux:
    light Code Review ACK faa23738fc2576e412edb04a4004fab537a3098e
  ryanofsky:
    Code review ACK faa23738fc2576e412edb04a4004fab537a3098e, only adding `value_or` implementation and `CheckedReturnTypes` clang-tidy commit since last review.
  stickies-v:
    ACK faa23738fc2576e412edb04a4004fab537a3098e

Tree-SHA512: fdbd0f6bf439738ffe6a68da5522f1051537f8df9c308eb90bef6bd2e06931d79f1c5da22d5500765e9cb1d801d5be39e11e10d47c9659fec1a8c8804cb7c872
2025-12-08 20:11:51 -05:00
MarcoFalke
faa23738fc
refactor: Enable clang-tidy bugprone-unused-return-value
This requires some small refactors to silence false-positive warnings.

Also, expand the bugprone-unused-return-value.CheckedReturnTypes option
to include util::Result, and util::Expected.
2025-12-06 13:06:28 +01:00
MarcoFalke
fa05181d90
scripted-diff: LogPrintf -> LogInfo
This refactor does not change behavior.

-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-

 sed --in-place 's/\<LogPrintf\>/LogInfo/g' \
   $( git grep -l '\<LogPrintf\>' -- ./contrib/ ./src/ ./test/ ':(exclude)src/logging.h' )

-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
2025-12-04 19:52:49 +01:00
merge-script
ad452a1e65
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#33528: wallet: don't consider unconfirmed TRUC coins with ancestors
dcd42d6d8f160ae8bc12c152099a6e6473658e30 [test] wallet send 3 generation TRUC (glozow)
e753fadfd01cb8a4a8de3bddc7391481551cca89 [wallet] never try to spend from unconfirmed TRUC that already has ancestors (glozow)

Pull request description:

  Addresses https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/33368#issuecomment-3319935660

  There is not an explicit check that the to-be-created wallet transaction would be within the {TRUC, normal} ancestor limits. This means that the wallet may create a transaction that violates these limits, but fail to broadcast it in `CommitTransaction`.

  This appears to be expected behavior for the normal ancestor limits (and any other situation in which the wallet creates a tx that was rejected by mempool) and AFAIK the transaction will be rebroadcast at some point after the ancestors confirm.

  1ed00a0d39/test/functional/wallet_basic.py (L502-L506)

  It's a bit complex to address this for the normal ancestor limit, and probably unrealistic for the wallet to check all possible mempool policies in coin selection, but it's quite trivial for TRUC: just skip any unconfirmed UTXOs that have any ancestors. I think it would be much more helpful to the user to say there are insufficient funds.

ACKs for top commit:
  achow101:
    ACK dcd42d6d8f160ae8bc12c152099a6e6473658e30
  monlovesmango:
    ACK dcd42d6d8f160ae8bc12c152099a6e6473658e30
  rkrux:
    lgtm ACK dcd42d6d8f160ae8bc12c152099a6e6473658e30

Tree-SHA512: b4cf9685bf0593c356dc0d6644835d53e3d7089f42b65f647795257dc7f5dac90c5ee493b41ee30a1c1beb880a859db8e049d3c64a43d5ca9b3e6482ff6bddd5
2025-12-04 09:47:26 +00:00
Lőrinc
d9319b06cf
refactor: unify container presence checks - non-trivial counts
The changes made here were:

| From              | To               |
|-------------------|------------------|
| `m.count(k) == 1` | `m.contains(k)`  |
| `m.count(k) == 0` | `!m.contains(k)` |
| `m.count(k) != 1` | `!m.contains(k)` |
| `m.count(k) < 1`  | `!m.contains(k)` |

* `mapInfo` is instance of `std::unordered_map` and can only contain 0 or 1 value for a given key;
* similarly, `g_enabled_filter_types` and `setClientRules` are both `std::set` instances;
* lastly, while `mapTxSpends` is `std::unordered_multimap` that could potentially hold multiple values, having a size less than 1 means that the value is missing.

`QMap<WalletModel*, WalletView*> mapWalletViews` values were also migrated manually.

Co-authored-by: pablomartin4btc <pablomartin4btc@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: fanquake <fanquake@gmail.com>
2025-12-03 13:37:17 +01:00
Lőrinc
039307554e
refactor: unify container presence checks - trivial counts
The changes made here were:

| From              | To               |
|-------------------|------------------|
| `m.count(k)`      | `m.contains(k)`  |
| `!m.count(k)`     | `!m.contains(k)` |
| `m.count(k) == 0` | `!m.contains(k)` |
| `m.count(k) != 0` | `m.contains(k)`  |
| `m.count(k) > 0`  | `m.contains(k)`  |

The commit contains the trivial, mechanical refactors where it doesn't matter if the container can have multiple elements or not

Co-authored-by: Jan B <608446+janb84@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-12-03 13:36:58 +01:00
Lőrinc
8bb9219b63
refactor: unify container presence checks - find
The changes made here were:

| From                   | To               |
|------------------------|------------------|
| `m.find(k) == m.end()` | `!m.contains(k)` |
| `m.find(k) != m.end()` | `m.contains(k)`  |
2025-12-03 13:31:11 +01:00
MarcoFalke
fa45a1503e
log: Use LogWarning for non-critical logs
As per doc/developer-notes#logging, LogWarning should be used for severe
problems that do not warrant shutting down the node
2025-11-27 14:33:59 +01:00
MarcoFalke
fa0018d011
log: Use LogError for fatal errors 2025-11-27 14:33:57 +01:00
merge-script
509dc91db1
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#33026: test, refactor: Embedded ASMap [1/3]: Selected minor preparatory work
7f318e1dd0496384e7bc6d8754c5a2a618a14b2a test: Add better coverage for Autofile size() (Fabian Jahr)
b7af960eb82f5e3af530014a4f59c48faa3a4109 refactor: Add AutoFile::size (Fabian Jahr)
ec0f75862e6791eade487f0dc7d4d0a8c91b9ba5 refactor: Modernize logging in util/asmap.cpp (Fabian Jahr)
606a251e0a3146eb2d2beb7cef486b2d46a37b40 tests: add unit test vectors for asmap interpreter (Pieter Wuille)

Pull request description:

  This contains some commits from #28792 that can be easily reviewed and merged independently. I hope splitting this change off can make this part move a bit faster and reduce frequency of needed rebases for #28792.

  The commits in order:
  - Add additional unit test vectors to the asmap interpreter (written by sipa). This helps to ensure that the further refactors in #28792 don't change behavior.
  - Modernizes the logging in `util/asmap.cpp`, I added this while touching the rest of the file all over anyway.
  - Adds an `AutoFile::size` helper function with some additional test coverage in a separate commit

ACKs for top commit:
  maflcko:
    review ACK 7f318e1dd0496384e7bc6d8754c5a2a618a14b2a 🏀
  hodlinator:
    tACK 7f318e1dd0496384e7bc6d8754c5a2a618a14b2a
  laanwj:
    Code review ACK 7f318e1dd0496384e7bc6d8754c5a2a618a14b2a

Tree-SHA512: 45156b74e4bd9278a7ec24521dfdafe4dab1ba3384243c7d589ef17e16ca374ee2af7178c86b7229e80ca262dbe78c4d456d80a6ee742ec31d2ab5243dac8b57
2025-11-19 09:28:44 +00:00
Fabian Jahr
b7af960eb8
refactor: Add AutoFile::size 2025-11-14 01:17:38 +02:00
ismaelsadeeq
b0a3887154
scripted-diff: fix leftover references to policy/fees.h
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
git grep -l "policy\/fees\.h" | xargs sed -i "s/policy\/fees.h/policy\/fees\/block_policy_estimator.h/g"
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
2025-11-12 17:40:47 +00:00
merge-script
3789215f73
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#33724: refactor: Return uint64_t from GetSerializeSize
fa6c0bedd33ac7ad27454adaf9522fd27bef6ea3 refactor: Return uint64_t from GetSerializeSize (MarcoFalke)
fad0c8680ea7ef433c2d6e7c0d5799f81fd861b9 refactor: Use uint64_t over size_t for serialized-size values (MarcoFalke)
fa4f388fc99c9ec7c3cf2bac3863c7b3004bb2ae refactor: Use fixed size ints over (un)signed ints for serialized values (MarcoFalke)
fa01f38e53cfda4155d0ea09ca8b1291b7001fe8 move-only: Move CBlockFileInfo to kernel namespace (MarcoFalke)
fa2bbc9e4cfe017436a5167ab5c443f4412efa3c refactor: [rpc] Remove cast when reporting serialized size (MarcoFalke)
fa364af89bd914ea7cd0d4a5470e0a502e0a2075 test: Remove outdated comment (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  Consensus code should arrive at the same conclusion, regardless of the architecture it runs on. Using architecture-specific types such as `size_t` can lead to issues, such as the low-severity [CVE-2025-46597](https://bitcoincore.org/en/2025/10/24/disclose-cve-2025-46597/).

  The CVE was already worked around, but it may be good to still fix the underlying issue.

  Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/33709 with a few refactors to use explicit fixed-sized integer types in serialization-size related code and concluding with a refactor to return `uint64_t` from `GetSerializeSize`. The refactors should not change any behavior, because the CVE was already worked around.

ACKs for top commit:
  Crypt-iQ:
    crACK fa6c0bedd33ac7ad27454adaf9522fd27bef6ea3
  l0rinc:
    ACK fa6c0bedd33ac7ad27454adaf9522fd27bef6ea3
  laanwj:
    Code review ACK fa6c0bedd33ac7ad27454adaf9522fd27bef6ea3

Tree-SHA512: f45057bd86fb46011e4cb3edf0dc607057d72ed869fd6ad636562111ae80fea233b2fc45c34b02256331028359a9c3f4fa73e9b882b225bdc089d00becd0195e
2025-11-12 09:48:10 -05:00
Ava Chow
8c2710b041
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#32517: rpc: add "ischange: true" to decoded tx outputs in wallet gettransaction response
060bb55508245776bb6a39c8b7849769ee588d69 rpc: add decoded tx details to gettransaction with extra wallet fields (Matthew Zipkin)
ad1c3bdba547685ca4163316017ab78e965c7ad1 [move only] move DecodeTxDoc() to a common util file for sharing (Matthew Zipkin)
d633db54166497685b80a12c51db6772982e01fe rpc: add "ischange: true" in wallet gettransaction decoded tx output (Matthew Zipkin)

Pull request description:

  This change is motivated by external RBF clients like https://github.com/CardCoins/additive-rbf-batcher/. It saves the user a redundant re-looping of tx outputs, calling `getaddressinfo` on each one, looking for the change output in order to adjust the fee.

  The field `"ischange"` only appears when `gettransaction` is called on a wallet, and is either `true` or not present at all. I chose not to include `ischange: false` because it is confusing to see that on *received* transactions.

  Example of the new field:

  ```
      "vout": [
        {
          "value": 1.00000000,
          "n": 0,
          "scriptPubKey": {
            "asm": "0 5483235e05c76273b3b50af62519738781aff021",
            "desc": "addr(bcrt1q2jpjxhs9ca388va4ptmz2xtns7q6lupppkw7wu)#d42g84j6",
            "hex": "00145483235e05c76273b3b50af62519738781aff021",
            "address": "bcrt1q2jpjxhs9ca388va4ptmz2xtns7q6lupppkw7wu",
            "type": "witness_v0_keyhash"
          }
        },
        {
          "value": 198.99859000,
          "n": 1,
          "scriptPubKey": {
            "asm": "0 870ab1ab58632b05a417d5295f4038500e407592",
            "desc": "addr(bcrt1qsu9tr26cvv4stfqh65547spc2q8yqavj7fnlju)#tgapemkv",
            "hex": "0014870ab1ab58632b05a417d5295f4038500e407592",
            "address": "bcrt1qsu9tr26cvv4stfqh65547spc2q8yqavj7fnlju",
            "type": "witness_v0_keyhash"
          },
          "ischange": true
        }
      ]

  ```

ACKs for top commit:
  furszy:
    ACK [060bb55](060bb55508)
  maflcko:
    review ACK 060bb55508245776bb6a39c8b7849769ee588d69 🌛
  achow101:
    ACK 060bb55508245776bb6a39c8b7849769ee588d69
  rkrux:
    lgtm ACK 060bb55508245776bb6a39c8b7849769ee588d69

Tree-SHA512: aae4854d2bb4e9a7bc1152691ea90e594e8da8a63c9c7fda72a504fb6a7e54ae274ed5fa98d35d270e0829cc8f8d2fd35a5fc9735c252a10aa42cc22828930e7
2025-11-10 08:58:34 -08:00
merge-script
25c45bb0d0
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#33567: node: change a tx-relay on/off flag to enum
07a926474b5a6fa1d3d4656362a0117611f6da2f node: change a tx-relay on/off flag to enum (Vasil Dimov)

Pull request description:

  Previously the `bool relay` argument to `BroadcastTransaction()` designated:

  ```
  relay=true: add to the mempool and broadcast to all peers
  relay=false: add to the mempool
  ```

  Change this to an `enum`, so it is more readable and easier to extend with a 3rd option. Consider these example call sites:

  ```cpp
  Paint(true);
  // Or
  Paint(/*is_red=*/true);
  ```

  vs

  ```cpp
  Paint(RED);
  ```

  The idea for putting `TxBroadcastMethod` into `node/types.h` by Ryan.

  ---

  This is part of [#29415 Broadcast own transactions only via short-lived Tor or I2P connections](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29415). Putting it in its own PR to reduce the size of #29415 and because it does not logically depend on the other commits from there.

ACKs for top commit:
  optout21:
    ACK 07a926474b5a6fa1d3d4656362a0117611f6da2f
  kevkevinpal:
    ACK [07a9264](07a926474b)
  laanwj:
    Concept and code review ACK 07a926474b5a6fa1d3d4656362a0117611f6da2f. Agree with the general reasoning and the change in #29415 is a valid motivation to change this interface.
  glozow:
    utACK 07a926474b5a6fa1d3d4656362a0117611f6da2f

Tree-SHA512: ec8f6fa56a6d2422a0fbd5941ff2792685e8d8e7b9dd50bba9f3e21ed9b4a4a26c89b0d7e4895d48f30b7a635f2eddd894af26b5266410952cbdaf5c40b42966
2025-10-31 14:59:58 -04:00
MarcoFalke
fad0c8680e
refactor: Use uint64_t over size_t for serialized-size values
The values are small enough to fit in size_t, but to avoid having to
think about it, just use uint64_t consistently for all architectures.

On 64-bit systems, this refactor is a no-op. On 32-bit systems, it could
avoid bugs in the theoretical and unexpected case where a 32-bit size_t
is too small and overflows.
2025-10-30 17:51:40 +01:00
Matthew Zipkin
060bb55508
rpc: add decoded tx details to gettransaction with extra wallet fields 2025-10-29 12:12:11 -04:00
Matthew Zipkin
d633db5416
rpc: add "ischange: true" in wallet gettransaction decoded tx output 2025-10-29 12:09:19 -04:00
merge-script
1abc8fa308
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#33218: refactor: rename fees.{h,cpp} to fees/block_policy_estimator.{h,cpp}
1a7fb5eeeef3575c1e7c27915c9b98695191299d fees: return current block height in estimateSmartFee (ismaelsadeeq)
ab49480d9be4e54aa9db1247b8499f957ba9d166 fees: rename fees_args to block_policy_estimator_args (ismaelsadeeq)
06db08a43568910702207a7963b375e1a7446689 fees: refactor: rename fees to block_policy_estimator (ismaelsadeeq)
6dfdd7e034dd3620f0f8ed54dfe20fa407b5382f fees: refactor: rename policy_fee_tests.cpp to feerounder_tests.cpp (ismaelsadeeq)

Pull request description:

  This PR is a simple refactoring that does four things:

  1. Renames `test/policy_fee_tests.cpp` to `test/feerounder_tests.cpp`.
  2. Renames `policy/fees.{h,cpp}` to `policy/fees/block_policy_estimator.{h,cpp}`.
  3. Renames `policy/fees_args.cpp` to `policy/fees/block_policy_estimator_args.cpp`.
  4. Modifies `estimateSmartFee` to return the block height at which the estimate was made by adding a `best_height` unsigned int value to the `FeeCalculation` struct.

  **Motivation**

  In preparation for adding a new fee estimator, the `fees` directory is created so we can organize code into `block_policy_estimator` and `mempool` because

  a) It would be clunky to add more code directly under `fees`.
  b) Having `policy/fees.{h,cpp}` and `policy/mempool.{h,cpp}` would also be undesirable.

  Therefore, it makes sense to structure the it as `policy/fees/block_policy_estimator`, `policy/fees/mempool`, etc.
  Hence test file were also updated accordingly.

  The current block height is also returned because later in #30157 we log the height at which each estimate is made (at the debug log category of  fee estimation :) ). This feature is particularly useful for empirical data analysis.

ACKs for top commit:
  maflcko:
    re-ACK 1a7fb5eeeef3575c1e7c27915c9b98695191299d 🐤
  polespinasa:
    re ACK 1a7fb5eeeef3575c1e7c27915c9b98695191299d
  willcl-ark:
    ACK 1a7fb5eeeef3575c1e7c27915c9b98695191299d
  janb84:
    re ACK 1a7fb5eeeef3575c1e7c27915c9b98695191299d

Tree-SHA512: fef7ace2a9f262ec0361fb7a46df5108afc46b5c4b059caadf2fd114740aefbb2592389d11646c13d0e28bf0ef2cfcfbab3e659c4d4288b8ebe64725fd1963c0
2025-10-28 11:57:59 -04:00
Ava Chow
80bb7012be
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#31514: wallet: allow label for non-ranged external descriptor (if internal=false) & disallow label for ranged descriptors
664657ed134365588914c2cf6a3975ce368a4f49 bugfix: disallow label for ranged descriptors & allow external non-ranged descriptors to have label (scgbckbone)

Pull request description:

  Motivation:
  * ranged descriptors MUST not be able to have label (current impl allows it)
  * external non-ranged descriptor MUST be able to have label (current impl disallows it, **if** `internal=false` is provided via importdescriptor user data)

  Repro steps:
  * create blank wallet and import descriptors
  * external has `label=test` (not internal)
  ```
      conn = bitcoind.create_wallet(wallet_name=w_name, disable_private_keys=True, blank=True,
                                    passphrase=None, avoid_reuse=False, descriptors=True)
      descriptors = [
          {
              "timestamp": "now",
              "label": "test",
              "active": True,
              "desc": "wpkh([0f056943/84h/1h/0h]tpubDC7jGaaSE66Pn4dgtbAAstde4bCyhSUs4r3P8WhMVvPByvcRrzrwqSvpF9Ghx83Z1LfVugGRrSBko5UEKELCz9HoMv5qKmGq3fqnnbS5E9r/0/*)#erexmnep",
              "internal": False
          },
          {
              "desc": "wpkh([0f056943/84h/1h/0h]tpubDC7jGaaSE66Pn4dgtbAAstde4bCyhSUs4r3P8WhMVvPByvcRrzrwqSvpF9Ghx83Z1LfVugGRrSBko5UEKELCz9HoMv5qKmGq3fqnnbS5E9r/1/*)#ghu8xxfe",
              "active": True,
              "internal": True,
              "timestamp": "now"
          },
      ]
      r = conn.importdescriptors(descriptors)
      print(r)
  ```
  response:
  ```
  [{'error': {'code': -8,
              'message': 'Internal addresses should not have a label'},
    'success': False,
    'warnings': ['Range not given, using default keypool range']},
   {'success': True,
    'warnings': ['Range not given, using default keypool range']}]
  ```
  But in above, ONLY external has a label.

  If you remove `internal: False` from external descriptor import object - it will import no problem:
  ```
  [{'success': True,
    'warnings': ['Range not given, using default keypool range']},
   {'success': True,
    'warnings': ['Range not given, using default keypool range']}]

  ```
  Even tho it should NOT, as the descriptor is ranged. Current implementation relies on checking user provided data to decide whether desc is ranged.

ACKs for top commit:
  achow101:
    ACK 664657ed134365588914c2cf6a3975ce368a4f49
  rkrux:
    lgtm crACK 664657ed134365588914c2cf6a3975ce368a4f49

Tree-SHA512: 9e70aea620019c29950ba417d4ae38d65cd94a4f6fcabbc021d67b031de1c44c27d6f6f5cb7e6950a099eb6e58bed9be764d4c6347195daeccb14a5d95c123b2
2025-10-27 13:56:45 -07:00
ismaelsadeeq
06db08a435
fees: refactor: rename fees to block_policy_estimator
- Also move it to policy/fees and update the includes
2025-10-27 10:41:02 +01:00
Ava Chow
1916c51cd8
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#33210: fuzz: enhance wallet_fees by mocking mempool stuff
5ded99a7f007b142f6b0ec89e0c71ef281b42684 fuzz: MockMempoolMinFee in wallet_fees (brunoerg)
c9a7a198d9e81e99de99a2aaff1687d13d6674e8 test: move MockMempoolMinFee to util/txmempool (brunoerg)
adf67eb21baf39a222b65480e45ae76f093e8f66 fuzz: create FeeEstimatorTestingSetup to set fee_estimator (brunoerg)
ff10a37e99271125a9ece92bae571f7b78fb9e22 fuzz: mock CBlockPolicyEstimator in wallet_fuzz (brunoerg)
f591c3becafcdd7c81722c647865a1f908b6469a fees: make estimateSmartFee/HighestTargetTracked virtual for mocking (brunoerg)
19273d0705fcd2fbde686bc3b5b2375f691e303d fuzz: set mempool options in wallet_fees (brunoerg)

Pull request description:

  Some functions in `wallet/fees.cpp` (fuzzed by the wallet_fees target) depends on some mempool stuff - e.g. relay current min fee, smart fee and max blocks estimation, relay dust fee and other ones. For better fuzzing of it, it would be great to have these values/interactions. That said, this PR enhances the `wallet_fees` target by:

  - Setting mempool options - `min_relay_feerate`,  `dust_relay_feerate` and `incremental_relay_feerate` - when creating the `CTxMemPool`.
  - Creates a `ConsumeMempoolMinFee` function which is used to have a mempool min fee (similar approach from `MockMempoolMinFee` from unit test).
  - Mock `CBlockPolicyEstimator` - estimateSmartFee/HighestTagretTracket functions, especifically. It's better to mock it then trying to interact to CBlockPolicyEstimator in order to have some effective values due to performance.

  Note that I created `FeeEstimatorTestingSetup` because we cannot set `m_node.fee_estimator` in `ChainTestingSetup` since fae8c73d9e4eba4603447bb52b6e3e760fbf15f8.

ACKs for top commit:
  maflcko:
    re-ACK 5ded99a7f007b142f6b0ec89e0c71ef281b42684 🎯
  ismaelsadeeq:
    Code review ACK 5ded99a7f007b142f6b0ec89e0c71ef281b42684

Tree-SHA512: 13d2af042098afd237ef349437021ea841069d93d4c3e3a32e1b562c027d00c727f375426709d34421092993398caf7ba8ff19077982cb6f470f8938a44e7754
2025-10-24 11:43:42 -07:00
Ava Chow
c6c4edf324
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#32983: rpc: refactor: use string_view in Arg/MaybeArg
b63428ac9ce2c903670409b3e47b9f6730917ae8 rpc: refactor: use more (Maybe)Arg<std::string_view> (stickies-v)
037830ca0dbb6ede9f9d72691c756f4bae6c97e2 refactor: increase string_view usage (stickies-v)
b3bf18f0bac0ffe18206ee20642e11264ba0c99d rpc: refactor: use string_view in Arg/MaybeArg (stickies-v)

Pull request description:

  The `RPCHelpMan::{Arg,MaybeArg}` helpers avoid copying (potentially) large strings by returning them as `const std::string*` (`MaybeArg`) or `const std::string&` (`Arg`). For `MaybeArg`, this has the not-so-nice effect that users need to deal with raw pointers, potentially also requiring new functions (e.g. [`EnsureUniqueWalletName` ](d127b25199 (diff-d8bfcfbdd5fa7d5c52d38c1fe5eeac9ce5c5a794cdfaf683585140fa70a32374R32))) with raw pointers being implemented.

  This PR aims to improve on this by returning a trivially copyable `std::string_view` (`Arg`) or `std::optional<std::string_view>` (`MaybeArg`), modernizing the interface without introducing any additional copying overhead. In doing so, it also generalizes whether we return by value or by pointer/reference using `std::is_trivially_copyable_v` instead of defining the types manually.

  In cases where functions currently take a `const std::string&` and it would be too much work / touching consensus logic to update them (`signmessage.cpp`), a `std::string` copy is made (which was already happening anyway).

  The last 2 commits increase usage of the `{Arg,MaybeArg}<std::string_view>` helpers, and could be dropped/pruned if anything turns out to be controversial - I just think it's a nice little cleanup.

ACKs for top commit:
  maflcko:
    re-ACK b63428ac9ce2c903670409b3e47b9f6730917ae8 🎉
  achow101:
    ACK b63428ac9ce2c903670409b3e47b9f6730917ae8
  pablomartin4btc:
    re-ACK [b63428a](b63428ac9c)
  w0xlt:
    reACK b63428ac9c

Tree-SHA512: b4942c353a1658c22a88d8c9b402c288ad35265a3b88aa2072b1f9b6d921cd073194ed4b00b807cb48ca440f47c87ef3d8e0dd1a5d814be58fc7743f26288277
2025-10-24 10:33:51 -07:00
Hennadii Stepanov
3fee0754a2
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#33550: Fix windows libc++ fs::path fstream compile errors
c864a4c1940d682f7eb6fdb3b91b18d638b59330 Simplify fs::path by dropping filename() and make_preferred() overloads (Ryan Ofsky)
b0113afd44b4c7c0d0da9883424bd2978de3d18c Fix windows libc++ fs::path fstream compile errors (Ryan Ofsky)

Pull request description:

  Drop support for passing `fs::path` directly to `std::ifstream` and `std::ofstream` constructors and `open()` functions, because as reported by hebasto in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/33545, after https://wg21.link/lwg3430 there is no way this can continue to work in windows builds, and there are already compile errors compiling for windows with newer versions of libc++.

  Instead, add an `fs::path::std_path()` method that returns `std::filesystem::path` references and use it where needed.

ACKs for top commit:
  hebasto:
    ACK c864a4c1940d682f7eb6fdb3b91b18d638b59330.
  l0rinc:
    Code review ACK c864a4c1940d682f7eb6fdb3b91b18d638b59330
  maflcko:
    re-ACK c864a4c1940d682f7eb6fdb3b91b18d638b59330 🌥

Tree-SHA512: d22372692ab86244e2b2caf4c5e9c9acbd9ba38df5411606b75e428474eabead152fc7ca1afe0bb0df6b818351211a70487e94b40a17b68db5aa757604a0ddf6
2025-10-22 10:10:27 +02:00
Vasil Dimov
07a926474b
node: change a tx-relay on/off flag to enum
Previously the `bool relay` argument to `BroadcastTransaction()`
designated:

```
relay=true: add to the mempool and broadcast to all peers
relay=false: add to the mempool
```

Change this to an `enum`, so it is more readable and easier to extend
with a 3rd option. Consider these example call sites:

```cpp
Paint(true);
// Or
Paint(/*is_red=*/true);
```

vs

```cpp
Paint(RED);
```

The idea for putting `TxBroadcastMethod` into `node/types.h` by Ryan.

Co-authored-by: Ryan Ofsky <ryan@ofsky.org>
2025-10-15 08:52:48 +02:00
merge-script
48aa0e98d0
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#29675: wallet: Be able to receive and spend inputs involving MuSig2 aggregate keys
ac599c4a9cb3b2d424932d3fd91f9eed17426827 test: Test MuSig2 in the wallet (Ava Chow)
68ef954c4c59802a6810a462eaa8dd61728ba820 wallet: Keep secnonces in DescriptorScriptPubKeyMan (Ava Chow)
4a273edda0ec10f0c5ae5d94b9925fa334d1c6e6 sign: Create MuSig2 signatures for known MuSig2 aggregate keys (Ava Chow)
258db938899409c8ee1cef04e16ba1795ea0038d sign: Add CreateMuSig2AggregateSig (Ava Chow)
bf69442b3f5004dc3df5a1b1d752114ba68fa5f4 sign: Add CreateMuSig2PartialSig (Ava Chow)
512b17fc56eac3a2e2b9ba489b5423d098cce0db sign: Add CreateMuSig2Nonce (Ava Chow)
82ea67c607cde6187d7082429d27b927dc21c0c6 musig: Add MuSig2AggregatePubkeys variant that validates the aggregate (Ava Chow)
d99a081679e16668458512aba2fd13a3e1bdb09f psbt: MuSig2 data in Fill/FromSignatureData (Ava Chow)
4d8b4f53363f013ed3972997f0b05b9c19e9db9d signingprovider: Add musig2 secnonces (Ava Chow)
c06a1dc86ff2347538e95041ab7b97af25342958 Add MuSig2SecNonce class for secure allocation of musig nonces (Ava Chow)
9baff05e494443cd82708490f384aa3034ad43bd sign: Include taproot output key's KeyOriginInfo in sigdata (Ava Chow)
4b24bfeab9d6732aae3e69efd33105792ef1198f pubkey: Return tweaks from BIP32 derivation (Ava Chow)
f14876213aad0e67088b75cae24323db9f2576d8 musig: Move synthetic xpub construction to its own function (Ava Chow)
fb8720f1e09f4e41802f07be53fb220d6f6c127f sign: Refactor Schnorr sighash computation out of CreateSchnorrSig (Ava Chow)
a4cfddda644f1fc9a815b2d16c997716cd63554a tests: Clarify why musig derivation adds a pubkey and xpub (Ava Chow)
39a63bf2e7e38dd3f30b5d1a8f6b2fff0e380d12 descriptors: Add a doxygen comment for has_hardened output_parameter (Ava Chow)
2320184d0ea87279558a8e6cbb3bccf5ba1bb781 descriptors: Fix meaning of any_key_parsed (Ava Chow)

Pull request description:

  This PR implements MuSig2 signing so that the wallet can receive and spend from imported `musig(0` descriptors.

  The libsecp musig module is enabled so that it can be used for all of the MuSig2 cryptography.

  Secnonces are handled in a separate class which holds the libsecp secnonce object in a `secure_unique_ptr`. Since secnonces must not be used, this class has no serialization and will only live in memory. A restart of the software will require a restart of the MuSig2 signing process.

ACKs for top commit:
  fjahr:
    tACK ac599c4a9cb3b2d424932d3fd91f9eed17426827
  rkrux:
    lgtm tACK ac599c4a9cb3b2d424932d3fd91f9eed17426827
  theStack:
    Code-review ACK ac599c4a9cb3b2d424932d3fd91f9eed17426827 🗝️

Tree-SHA512: 626b9adc42ed2403e2f4405321eb9ce009a829c07d968e95ab288fe4940b195b0af35ca279a4a7fa51af76e55382bad6f63a23bca14a84140559b3c667e7041e
2025-10-14 16:25:52 -04:00
Ryan Ofsky
c864a4c194 Simplify fs::path by dropping filename() and make_preferred() overloads
These overloads were needed to allow passing `fs::path` objects directly to
libstdc++'s `fstream` constructors, but after the previous commit, there is no
longer any remaining code that does pass `fs::path` objects to `fstream`
constructors. Writing new code which does this is also discouraged because the
standard has been updated in https://wg21.link/lwg3430 to disallow it.

Dropping these also means its no longer possible to pass `fs::path` arguments
directly to `fstream::open` in libstdc++, which is somewhat unfortunate but not
a big loss because it is already not possible to pass them to the constructor.
So this commit updates `fstream::open` calls.

Additionally, this change required updates to src/bitcoin.cpp since it was
relying on the overloaded filename() method.
2025-10-06 12:14:02 -04:00
Ryan Ofsky
b0113afd44 Fix windows libc++ fs::path fstream compile errors
As reported by hebasto in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/33545,
newer libc++ versions implementing https://wg21.link/lwg3430 will no longer
implicitly convert `fs::path` objects to `std::filesystem::path` objects when
constructing `std::ifstream` and `std::ofstream` types.

This is not a problem in Unix systems since `fs::path` objects use
`std::string` as their native string type, but it causes compile errors on
Windows which use `std::wstring` as their string type, since `fstream`s can't
be constructed from `wstring`s.

Fix the windows libc++ compile errors by adding a new `fs::path::std_path()`
method and using it construct `fstream`s more portably.

Additionally, delete `fs::path`'s implicit `native_string` conversion so these
errors will not go undetected in the future, even though there is not currently
a CI job testing Windows libc++ builds.
2025-10-06 11:25:56 -04:00
glozow
e753fadfd0 [wallet] never try to spend from unconfirmed TRUC that already has ancestors 2025-10-02 17:56:29 -04:00
stickies-v
b3bf18f0ba
rpc: refactor: use string_view in Arg/MaybeArg
Modernizes interface by not forcing users to deal with raw pointers,
without adding copying overhead. Generalizes the logic of whether
we return by value or by optional/pointer.

In cases where functions take a `const std::string&` and it would
be too much work to update them, a string copy is made (which was
already happening anyway).
2025-10-02 12:53:25 +01:00
Ava Chow
68ef954c4c wallet: Keep secnonces in DescriptorScriptPubKeyMan 2025-09-30 11:15:38 -07:00
furszy
fc861332b3 wallet, log: reduce unconditional logging during load
The removed statements were logged up to two or three times for each loaded
wallet. The SQLite version only needs to be logged once.
The full wallet path is dropped, since the existing unconditional
logging while loading wallets is sufficient (also reduces anonymization
efforts in case of sharing logs).

Co-authored-by: Martin Zumsande <mzumsande@gmail.com>
2025-09-29 13:59:44 -04:00
merge-script
dd61f08fd5
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#33031: wallet: Set descriptor cache upgraded flag for migrated wallets
88b0647f027a608acb61ec32329d19f8e5b0a9fd wallet: Always write last hardened cache flag in migrated wallets (Ava Chow)
8a08eef645eeb3e1991a80480c5ee232bfceeb37 tests: Check that the last hardened cache upgrade occurs (Ava Chow)

Pull request description:

  #32597 set the descriptor cache upgraded flag for newly created wallets, but migrated wallets still did not have the flag set when they are migrated. For consistency, and to avoid an unnecessary upgrade, we should be setting this flag for migrated wallets.

  The flag would end up being set anyways at the end of migration when the wallet is reloaded as it would perform the automatic upgrade at that time. However, this is unnecessary and we should just set it from the get go.

  This PR also adds a couple tests to verify that the flag is being set, and that the upgrade is being performed.

ACKs for top commit:
  cedwies:
    re-ACK 88b0647
  rkrux:
    lgtm ACK 88b0647f027a608acb61ec32329d19f8e5b0a9fd
  pablomartin4btc:
    ACK 88b0647f027a608acb61ec32329d19f8e5b0a9fd

Tree-SHA512: 7d0850db0ae38eedd1e6a3bfaa548c6c612182291059fb1a47279a4c4984ee7914ecd02d8c7e427ef67bf9f5e67cbc57a7ae4412fad539e1bf3e05c512a60d69
2025-09-23 15:27:17 -04:00
merge-script
d20f10affb
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#33268: wallet: Identify transactions spending 0-value outputs, and add tests for anchor outputs in a wallet
113a4228229baedda2a730e097f2d59ad58a4b0d wallet: Add m_cached_from_me to cache "from me" status (Ava Chow)
609d265ebc51abfe9a9ce570da647b6839dc1214 test: Add a test for anchor outputs in the wallet (Ava Chow)
c40dc822d74aea46e4a21774ca282e008f609c2a wallet: Throw an error in sendall if the tx size cannot be calculated (Ava Chow)
39a7dbdd277d1dea9a70314d8cc5ae057999ee88 wallet: Determine IsFromMe by checking for TXOs of inputs (Ava Chow)
e76c2f7a4111f87080e31539f83c21390fcd8f3b test: Test wallet 'from me' status change (Ava Chow)

Pull request description:

  One of the ways that the wallet would determine if a transaction was sent from the wallet was by checking if the total amount being spent by a transaction from outputs known to the wallet was greater than 0. This has worked fine until recently since there was no reason for 0-value outputs to be created. However, with ephemeral dust and P2A, it is possible to create standard 0-value outputs, and the wallet was not correctly identifying the spends of such outputs. This PR updates `IsFromMe` to only check whether the wallet knows any of the inputs, rather than checking the debit amount of a transaction.

  Additionally, a new functional test is added to test for this case, as well as a few other anchor output related scenarios. This also revealed a bug in `sendall` which would cause an assertion error when trying to spend all of the outputs in a wallet that has anchor outputs.

  Fixes #33265

ACKs for top commit:
  rkrux:
    lgtm ACK 113a4228229baedda2a730e097f2d59ad58a4b0d
  enirox001:
    Tested ACK 113a422. Ran the full functional test suite including `wallet_anchor.py`; all tests passed. Fix for 0 value anchor detection and sendall size errors looks good. LGTM.
  furszy:
    ACK 113a4228229baedda2a730e097f2d59ad58a4b0d

Tree-SHA512: df2ce4b258d1875ad0b4f27a5b9b4437137a5889a7d5ed7fbca65f904615e9572d232a8b8d070760f75ac168c1a49b7981f6b5052308575866dc610d191ca964
2025-09-12 14:42:08 +01:00
Ava Chow
591eea7b5a
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#33082: wallet, refactor: Remove Legacy check and error
d3c5e47391e2f158001e3e199d625852c7f18998 wallet, refactor: Remove Legacy check and error (pablomartin4btc)
30c6f64eed304560464f9601b80c811c186db20a test: Remove unnecessary LoadWallet() calls (pablomartin4btc)

Pull request description:

  Remove dead code due to legacy wallet removal.

  Leftovers from previous #32481.

  ---

  **Note**:

  While attempting to remove the legacy check in `CWallet::UpgradeDescriptorCache()` (which is called from `DBErrors WalletBatch::LoadWallet(CWallet* pwallet))`, I once again ran into the fact that `LoadWallet()` is used in two distinct scenarios — something I was already aware of:
  - Wallet creation – the upgrade is ignored here because no wallet flags are yet set; attempting to set a flag (ie `WALLET_FLAG_LAST_HARDENED_XPUB_CACHED` at the end of the upgrade function, if the legacy check is removed) would produce a failure (`DBErrors CWallet::LoadWallet()` -> `Assert(m_wallet_flags == 0)`).
  - Wallet loading – the upgrade proceeds correctly and the flag `WALLET_FLAG_LAST_HARDENED_XPUB_CACHED` is set.

  While revisiting this, I also noticed that some `LoadWallet()` calls in the wallet tests are unnecessary and I've removed them in the first commit.

  The following change in `UpgradeDescriptorCache()` could be done in PR #32636 as part of the separation between wallet loading and creation responsibilities.

  ```diff --git a/src/wallet/wallet.cpp b/src/wallet/wallet.cpp

   void CWallet::UpgradeDescriptorCache()
   {
  +    // Only descriptor wallets can upgrade descriptor cache
  +    Assert(IsWalletFlagSet(WALLET_FLAG_DESCRIPTORS));
  +
  -    if (!IsWalletFlagSet(WALLET_FLAG_DESCRIPTORS) || IsLocked() || IsWalletFlagSet(WALLET_FLAG_LAST_HARDENED_XPUB_CACHED)) {
  +    if (IsLocked() || IsWalletFlagSet(WALLET_FLAG_LAST_HARDENED_XPUB_CACHED)) {
           return;
       }
  ```

ACKs for top commit:
  davidgumberg:
    crACK d3c5e47391
  achow101:
    ACK d3c5e47391e2f158001e3e199d625852c7f18998
  l0rinc:
    code review ACK d3c5e47391e2f158001e3e199d625852c7f18998

Tree-SHA512: ead37cf4061dfce59feb41ac50e807e6790e1a5e6b358e3b9c13e63d61a9cb82317a2e596cecb543f62f88a4338171788b651452425c1f40b5c1bec7fe78339e
2025-09-09 14:36:56 -07:00
Ava Chow
113a422822 wallet: Add m_cached_from_me to cache "from me" status
m_cached_from_me is used to track whether a transaction is "from me", i.e. has
any inputs which belong to the wallet. This is held in memory only in
the same way that a transaction's balances are.
2025-09-03 13:04:52 -07:00
Ava Chow
c40dc822d7 wallet: Throw an error in sendall if the tx size cannot be calculated 2025-09-03 12:58:59 -07:00
Ava Chow
39a7dbdd27 wallet: Determine IsFromMe by checking for TXOs of inputs
Instead of checking whether the total amount of inputs known by the
wallet is greater than 0, we should be checking for whether the input is
known by the wallet. This enables us to determine whether a transaction
spends an of output with an amount of 0, which is necessary for marking
0-value dust outputs as spent.
2025-09-03 12:55:53 -07:00