These calls are no longer needed after edc316020e8270dafc5e31465d532baebdafd3dd
from #19098 which started instantiating BasicTestingSetup.m_node.chain
Patch from MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com> in
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19425#discussion_r526701954
Co-authored-by: MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com>
[META] This is a pure refactor commit.
Move PruneBlockFile to BlockManager because:
1. PruneOneBlockFile only acts on BlockManager
2. Eliminates the need for callers (FindFilesToPrune{,Manual}) to have a
reference to the larger ChainstateManager, just a reference to
BlockManager is enough. See following commits.
This removes a source of complexity and indirection that makes it harder to
understand path checking code. Path checks will be simplified in upcoming
commits.
There is no change in behavior in this commit other than a slightly more
descriptive error message in `loadwallet` if the default "" wallet can't be
found. (The error message is improved more in upcoming commit "wallet: Remove
path checking code from loadwallet RPC".)
Enable the GUI to also use the load_on_startup feature.
Wallets loaded in the GUI always have load_on_startup=true.
When they are unloaded from the GUI, load_on_startup=false.
To facilitate this change, UpdateWalletSetting is moved into the wallet
module and called from within LoadWallet, RemoveWallet, and
Createwallet. This change does not actually touch the GUI code but
rather the wallet functions that are shared between the GUI and RPC.
1554b54d47d7e24ce2491f57d24e56d38ceb7649 Static asserts for consistency of fee defaults. (Daniel Kraft)
Pull request description:
This adds `static_assert`'s that ensure that the default values given for fee levels in the wallet (minimum fee and incremental feerate increase) are at least as high as the corresponding levels configured in the core node policy. Since the core policy values are enforced by the network, it makes sense for the wallet to be conservative and above (or at least not below) this.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
code review ACK 1554b54d47d7e24ce2491f57d24e56d38ceb7649, these assumptions seem straightforward
Tree-SHA512: 50e5adf082f467062334377f82a3ee75bcfd436afc65bd0eb33c8d0549d6d90fd1f48c31f60cabe523eb59be9efa8ae0879e9e09cd51ca9c1bd466631ce03cf4
9c59f9c285303659ee1beed7555bbb322e6e6981 Fix ZapSelectTx to sync wallet spends (Anthony Fieroni)
Pull request description:
Signed-off-by: Anthony Fieroni <bvbfan@abv.bg>
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 9c59f9c285303659ee1beed7555bbb322e6e6981
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 9c59f9c285303659ee1beed7555bbb322e6e6981. Only change since last review tweaking the for loop as suggested
jonatack:
ACK 9c59f9c285303659ee1beed7555bbb322e6e6981 tested rebased on current master b33136b6ba9887f7d and the new unit test does indeed fail without the change.
meshcollider:
utACK 9c59f9c285303659ee1beed7555bbb322e6e6981
Tree-SHA512: 71672a5ab0c659550c3a40577614ea896412b79566b5672636ab18765e4c71b9d0a990d94dc6b6e623b03a05737022b04026b5699438809c7c54782d0fd0a5d2
fab80fef61ddd4afeff6e497c7e76bffcd05e8a4 refactor: Remove unused EnsureChainman (MarcoFalke)
fa34587f1c811d99200453b0936219c473f514b0 scripted-diff: Replace EnsureChainman with Assert in unit tests (MarcoFalke)
fa6ef701adba1cb48535cac25fd43c742a82e40d util: Add Assert identity function (MarcoFalke)
fa457fbd3387661e1973a8f4e5cc2def79e0c625 move-only: Move NDEBUG compile time check to util/check (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The utility function is primarily useful to dereference pointer types, which are known to be not null at that time.
For example, the ArgsManager is known to exist when the wallets are started: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18923/files#diff-fdb2a1a1d8bc790fcddeb6cf5a42ac55R503 . Instead of silently relying on that assumption, `Assert` can be used to abort the program and avoid UB should the assumption ever be violated.
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
Tested ACK fab80fef61ddd4afeff6e497c7e76bffcd05e8a4.
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fab80fef61ddd4afeff6e497c7e76bffcd05e8a4
Tree-SHA512: 830fba10152ba17d47c4dd42809c7e26f9fe6d38e17a2d5b3f054fd644a5c4c9841286ac421ec9bb28cea9f5faeb659740fcf00de6cc589d423fee7694c42d16
This adds static asserts that ensure that the default values given for
fee levels in the wallet (minimum fee and incremental feerate increase)
are at least as high as the corresponding levels configured in the
core node policy.
28b112e9bd3fd1181c0720306051ba7efca8b436 Get rid of BindWallet (Russell Yanofsky)
d002f9d15d938e78360ad906f2d74a249c7e923e Disable CWalletTx copy constructor (Russell Yanofsky)
65b9d8f8ddb5a838454efc8bdd6576f0deb65f6d Avoid copying CWalletTx in LoadToWallet (Russell Yanofsky)
bd2fbc7cdbec46400341209f4cb7e69e5b2cee19 Get rid of unneeded CWalletTx::Init parameter (Russell Yanofsky)
2b9cba206594bfbcefcef0c88a0bf793819643bd Remove CWalletTx merging logic from AddToWallet (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This is a pure refactoring, no behavior is changing.
Instead of AddToWallet taking a temporary CWalletTx object and then potentially merging it with a pre-existing CWalletTx, have it take a callback so callers can update the pre-existing CWalletTx directly.
This makes AddToWallet simpler because now it is only has to be concerned with saving CWalletTx objects and not merging them.
This makes AddToWallet calls clearer because they can now make direct updates to CWalletTx entries without having to make temporary objects and then worry about how they will be merged.
Motivation for this change came from the bumpfee PR #8456 where we wanted to be able to call AddToWallet to make a simple update to an existing transaction, but were reluctant to, because the existing CWalletTx merging logic did not apply and seemed dangerous try to update as part of that PR. After this refactoring, the bumpfee PR could call AddToWallet safely instead of implementing a duplicate AddToWallet function.
This also allows getting rid of the CWalletTx copy constructor to prevent unintentional copying.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
Anyway, re-ACK 28b112e9bd3fd1181c0720306051ba7efca8b436
Tree-SHA512: 528dd088714472a237500b200f4433db850bdb7fc29c5e5d81cae48072061dfb967f7c37edd90b33f24901239f9be982988547c1f8c80abc25fb243fbf7330ef
Also, mark feebumper bilingual_str as Untranslated
They are technical and have previously not been translated either.
It is questionable whether they can even appear in the GUI.
Common errors and warnings should be translated when displayed in the
GUI, but not translated when displayed elsewhere. The wallet method
CreateWalletFromFile does not know its caller, so this commit changes it
to return a bilingual_str to the caller.
Instead of AddToWallet taking a temporary CWalletTx object and then potentially
merging it with a pre-existing CWalletTx, have it take a callback so callers
can update the pre-existing CWalletTx directly.
This makes AddToWallet simpler because now it is only has to be concerned with
saving CWalletTx objects and not merging them.
This makes AddToWallet calls clearer because they can now make direct updates to
CWalletTx entries without having to make temporary objects and then worry about
how they will be merged.
This is a pure refactoring, no behavior is changing.
This change is intended to make the bitcoin node and its rpc, network
and gui interfaces more responsive while the wallet is in use. Currently
because the node's cs_main mutex is always locked before the wallet's
cs_wallet mutex (to prevent deadlocks), cs_main currently stays locked
while the wallet does relatively slow things like creating and listing
transactions.
This commit only remmove chain lock tacking in wallet code, and invert
lock order from cs_main, cs_wallet to cs_wallet, cs_main.
must happen at once to avoid any deadlock. Previous commit were only
removing Chain::Lock methods to Chain interface and enforcing they
take cs_main.
Remove LockChain method from CWallet and Chain::Lock interface.
Add unit test calling CreateWalletFromFile, which isn't currently called from
other unit tests, with some basic checks to make sure it rescans and registers
for notifications correctly.
Motivation for this change was to try to write a test that would fail without
the early `handleNotifications` call in ef8c6ca60767cac589d98ca57ee33179608ccda8
from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16426, but succeed with it:
ef8c6ca607/src/wallet/wallet.cpp (L3978-L3986)
However, writing a full test for the race condition that call prevents isn't
possible without the locking changes from #16426. So this PR just adds as much
test coverage as is possible now.
This new test is also useful for https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15719,
since it detects the stale notifications.transactionAddedToMempool notifications
that PR eliminates.
fa60afc4fb957875bab1c8982d9d9e4999a3814c wallet: Add BlockUntilSyncedToCurrentChain to dumpwallet (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
dumpwallet includes the block hash in the output, so this method depends on the chainstate. According to the developer notes e84a5f0004/doc/developer-notes.md (L1095) it must include a `BlockUntilSyncedToCurrentChain`.
This is a minor fix and does not need backport, I think.
It fixes test failures such as https://travis-ci.org/github/bitcoin/bitcoin/jobs/675487097#L2657 , which can only happen in master because the test was not backported.
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
Code review ACK fa60afc4fb957875bab1c8982d9d9e4999a3814c.
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fa60afc4fb957875bab1c8982d9d9e4999a3814c
meshcollider:
utACK fa60afc4fb957875bab1c8982d9d9e4999a3814c
Tree-SHA512: 8df70b06b226b2cdf880dec9264adb72d66fd81b09b404fd1665a79e5f5236d26122eebf15df00fe71ee292b5c91b2dc23a0a42b2aa50a8d690604b23832723f
48973402d8bccb673eaeb68b7aa86faa39d3cb8a wallet: Avoid use of Chain::Lock in CWallet::GetKeyBirthTimes (Russell Yanofsky)
e958ff9ab5607da2cd321f29fc785a6d359e44f4 wallet: Avoid use of Chain::Lock in CWallet::CreateTransaction (Russell Yanofsky)
c0d07dc4cba7634cde4e8bf586557772f3248a42 wallet: Avoid use of Chain::Lock in CWallet::ScanForWalletTransactions (Russell Yanofsky)
1be8ff280c78c30baabae9429c53c0bebb89c44d wallet: Avoid use of Chain::Lock in rescanblockchain (Russell Yanofsky)
3cb85ac594f115db99f96b0a0f4bfdcd69ef0590 wallet refactor: Avoid use of Chain::Lock in CWallet::RescanFromTime (Russell Yanofsky)
f7ba881bc669451a60fedac58a449794702a3e23 wallet: Avoid use of Chain::Lock in listsinceblock (Russell Yanofsky)
bc96a9bfc61afdb696fb92cb644ed5fc3d1793f1 wallet: Avoid use of Chain::Lock in importmulti (Russell Yanofsky)
25a9fcf9e53bfa94e8f8b19a4abfda0f444f6b2a wallet: Avoid use of Chain::Lock in importwallet and dumpwallet (Russell Yanofsky)
c1694ce6bb7e19a8722d5583cd85ad17da40bb67 wallet: Avoid use of Chain::Lock in importprunedfunds (Russell Yanofsky)
ade5f87971211bc67753f14a0d49e020142efc7c wallet refactor: Avoid use of Chain::Lock in qt wallettests (Russell Yanofsky)
f6da44ccce4cfff53433e665305a6fe0a01364e4 wallet: Avoid use of Chain::Lock in tryGetTxStatus and tryGetBalances (Russell Yanofsky)
bf30cd4922ea62577d7bf63f5029e8be62665d45 refactor: Add interfaces::FoundBlock class to selectively return block data (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This is a set of changes updating wallet code to make fewer calls to `Chain::Lock` methods, so the `Chain::Lock` class will be easier to remove in #16426 with fewer code changes and small changes to behavior.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 48973402d8, only change is fixing bug 📀
fjahr:
re-ACK 48973402d8bccb673eaeb68b7aa86faa39d3cb8a, reviewed rebase and changes since last review, built and ran tests locally
ariard:
Coce Review ACK 4897340, only changes are one suggested by last review on more accurate variable naming, human-readable output, args comments in `findCommonAncestor`
Tree-SHA512: cfd2f559f976b6faaa032794c40c9659191d5597b013abcb6c7968d36b2abb2b14d4e596f8ed8b9a077e96522365261299a241a939b3111eaf729ba0c3ef519b
This is a step toward removing the Chain::Lock class and reducing cs_main
locking.
This change affects behavior in a few small ways.
- If there's no max_height specified, percentage progress is measured ending at
wallet last processed block instead of node tip
- More consistent error reporting: Early check to see if start_block is on the
active chain is removed, so start_block is always read and the triggers an
error if it's unavailable
This is a step toward removing the Chain::Lock class and reducing cs_main
locking.
This change only affects behavior in the case where wallet last block processed
falls behind the chain tip, in which case it may use a more accurate rescan
time.
This is a step toward removing the Chain::Lock class and reducing cs_main
locking.
This change only affects behavior in the case where wallet last block processed
falls behind the chain tip, in which case it will use more accurate backup and
rescan timestamps.
I'd previously attempted to create a specialized lock for ChainstateManager,
but it turns out that because that lock would be required for functions like
ChainActive() and ChainstateActive(), it created irreconcilable lock inversions
since those functions are used so broadly throughout the codebase.
Instead, I'm just using cs_main to protect the contents of g_chainman.
Co-authored-by: Russell Yanofsky <russ@yanofsky.org>
0b75a7f0680d16a41043864a897470324917b1e8 wallet: Reuse existing batch in CWallet::SetUsedDestinationState (João Barbosa)
01f45dd00eb032a19d142026e4d019944192da19 wallet: Avoid recursive lock in CWallet::SetUsedDestinationState (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
This PR makes 2 distinct changes around `CWallet::SetUsedDestinationState`:
- 1st the recursive lock is removed and now it requires the lock to be held;
- 2nd change is to support, in the best case, just a wallet database flush when transaction is added to the wallet.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 0b75a7f0680d16a41043864a897470324917b1e8
MarcoFalke:
ACK 0b75a7f0680d16a41043864a897470324917b1e8
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 0b75a7f0680d16a41043864a897470324917b1e8. Code changes looks fine but PR description should be updated to say what benefits of the change are. I might have missed something, but I didn't see a place where multiple batches were used previously and a single batch was used now. So the main benefit of this change appears to be removing a recursive lock? And maybe moving toward a consistent convention for passing batch instances?
Tree-SHA512: abcf23a5850d29990668db20d6f624cca3e89629cc9ed003e0d05cde1b58ab2ff365034f156684ad13e55764b54c6c0c2bc7d5f96b8af7dc5e45a3be955d6b15
