When a CWallet doesn't have a ScriptPubKeyMan for the requested type
in GetNewDestination, give a meaningful error. Also handle this in
Qt which did not do anything with errors.
FillPSBT will add our own scripts to the PSBT if those inputs are ours.
If an input also lists pubkeys that we happen to know the private keys
for, we will sign those inputs too.
Internally, a GetSigningProvider function is introduced which allows for
some private keys to be optionally included. This can be called with a
script as the argument (i.e. a scriptPubKey from our wallet when we are
signing) or with a pubkey. In order to know what index to expand the
private keys for that pubkey, we need to also cache all of the pubkeys
involved when we expand the descriptor. So SetCache and TopUp are
updated to do this too.
Implements a bunch of one liners: UpgradeKeyMetadata, IsFirstRun, HavePrivateKeys,
KeypoolCountExternalKeys, GetKeypoolSize, GetTimeFirstKey, CanGetAddresses,
RewriteDB
fa60afc4fb957875bab1c8982d9d9e4999a3814c wallet: Add BlockUntilSyncedToCurrentChain to dumpwallet (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
dumpwallet includes the block hash in the output, so this method depends on the chainstate. According to the developer notes e84a5f0004/doc/developer-notes.md (L1095) it must include a `BlockUntilSyncedToCurrentChain`.
This is a minor fix and does not need backport, I think.
It fixes test failures such as https://travis-ci.org/github/bitcoin/bitcoin/jobs/675487097#L2657 , which can only happen in master because the test was not backported.
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
Code review ACK fa60afc4fb957875bab1c8982d9d9e4999a3814c.
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fa60afc4fb957875bab1c8982d9d9e4999a3814c
meshcollider:
utACK fa60afc4fb957875bab1c8982d9d9e4999a3814c
Tree-SHA512: 8df70b06b226b2cdf880dec9264adb72d66fd81b09b404fd1665a79e5f5236d26122eebf15df00fe71ee292b5c91b2dc23a0a42b2aa50a8d690604b23832723f
a1d5b12ec07d2f7aa9fa955a6dd99e8a2be5cb25 Merge getreceivedby tally into GetReceived function (Andrew Toth)
Pull request description:
This PR merges the tally code of `getreceivedbyaddress` and `getreceivedbylabel` into a single function `GetReceived`. This reduces repeated code and makes it similar to `listreceivedbyaddress` and `listreceivedbylabel`, which use the function `ListReceived`. It will also make the change in #14707 simpler and easier to review.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
re-ACK a1d5b12ec0
meshcollider:
utACK a1d5b12ec07d2f7aa9fa955a6dd99e8a2be5cb25
Tree-SHA512: 43d9cd92f7c2c6a8b9c7509aa85a9b9233a6cfec1c43a9062e3bdfb83515413d1feafa8938c828351278ba22bd31c47e62ab5341e4bddc2493103b094d73b047
0d32d661481f099af572e7a08a50e17bcc165c44 Remove -upgradewallet startup option (Andrew Chow)
92263cce5b6c6b66296dadda5f29724611db0160 Add upgradewallet RPC (Andrew Chow)
1e48796c99b63aa8fa8451ce7b0c20759ea43500 Make UpgradeWallet a member function of CWallet (Andrew Chow)
c988f27937bc79c90f4eed48552c72f1b66dc044 Have UpgradeWallet take the version to upgrade to and an error message out parameter (Andrew Chow)
183323712398e26ddcf3a9dc048aaa9900a91f5a Only run UpgradeWallet if the wallet needs to be upgraded (Andrew Chow)
9c16b1735f8e530ce68d678e9ca0eceb2ceb3520 Move wallet upgrading to its own function (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
`-upgradewallet` is largely incompatible with many recent wallet features and versions. For example, it was disabled if multiple wallets were used and would not work with encrypted wallets that were being upgraded to HD.
This PR does away with the old method of upgrading upon startup and instead allows users to upgrade their wallets via an `upgradewallet` RPC. This does largely the same thing as the old `-upgradewallet` option but because the wallet is loaded, it can be unlocked to upgrade to HD. Furthermore it is compatible with multiwallet as it works on the individual wallet that is specified by the RPC.
ACKs for top commit:
meshcollider:
Code review ACK 0d32d661481f099af572e7a08a50e17bcc165c44
darosior:
ACK 0d32d661481f099af572e7a08a50e17bcc165c44
MarcoFalke:
ACK 0d32d661481f099af572e7a08a50e17bcc165c44 🚵
Tree-SHA512: b425bf6f5d605e26506889d63c780895482f07cbc086193218e031e8504d3072d41e90d65cd41bcc98ee4c1eb048954bc5d4ac85435f7394892373aac89a3b0a
92bcd70808b9cac56b184903aa6d37baf9641b37 [wallet] allow transaction without change if keypool is empty (Sjors Provoost)
709f8685ac37510aa145ac259753583c82280038 [wallet] CreateTransaction: simplify change address check (Sjors Provoost)
5efc25f9638866941028454cfa9bae27f1519cb4 [wallet] translate "Keypool ran out" message (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
Extracted from #16944
First this PR simplifies the check when generating a change address, by dropping `CanGetAddresses` and just letting `reservedest.GetReservedDestination` do this check.
Second, when the keypool is empty, instead of immediately giving up, we create a dummy change address and pass that to coin selection. If we didn't need the change address (e.g. when spending the entire balance), then it's all good. If we did need a change address, we throw the original error.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
Code review ACK 92bcd70808b9cac56b184903aa6d37baf9641b37
jonasschnelli:
utACK 92bcd70808b9cac56b184903aa6d37baf9641b37
achow101:
ACK 92bcd70808b9cac56b184903aa6d37baf9641b37
meshcollider:
Code review ACK 92bcd70808b9cac56b184903aa6d37baf9641b37
Tree-SHA512: 07b8c8251f57061c58a85ebf0359be63583c23bac7a2c4cefdc14820c0cdebcc90a2bb218e5ede0db11d1e204cda149e056dfd18614642070b3d56efe2735006
fa168d754221a83cab0d2984a02c41cf6819e873 rpc: Document all aliases for first arg of listtransactions (MarcoFalke)
fa5b1f067fcf8bebb23455dd8a16cde5068e79cd rpc: Document all aliases for second arg of getblock (MarcoFalke)
fa86a4bbfc000593ae4ad9dcdaec3fd0c0406086 rpc: Rename first arg of generateblock RPC to "output" (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This fixes a bug found with #18531:
* Currently the named argument for `generateblock` is documented as `address/descriptor`, but the server only accepts a named argument of `address`. Fix it by changing the name to `output` for both the documentation and the server code. Also, add tests to prove the server understands the new name `output`.
* Unrelated to that, there have been a bunch of aliases in the server code that are not present in the source code of the documentation. Fix that by adding the alias to the source code of the documentation. Only the first alias is displayed in the rendered documentation. Also, add tests to prove the server actually understands all aliases.
ACKs for top commit:
pierreN:
Tested ACK fa168d7 tests, help messages
Tree-SHA512: 05e15628e3a667b296f3783d20f764b450b959451b5360c7eaf5993156582d47a0f5882330ca2493b851eb46324d504953b90c875bc88a15c9e8c89eb3ef8d92
fa4632c41714dfaa699bacc6a947d72668a4deef test: Move boost/stdlib includes last (MarcoFalke)
fa488f131fd4f5bab0d01376c5a5013306f1abcd scripted-diff: Bump copyright headers (MarcoFalke)
fac5c373006a9e4bcbb56843bb85f1aca4d87599 scripted-diff: Sort test includes (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
When writing tests, often includes need to be added or removed. Currently the list of includes is not sorted, so developers that write tests and have `clang-format` installed will either have an unrelated change (sorting) included in their commit or they will have to manually undo the sort.
This pull preempts both issues by just sorting all includes in one commit.
Please be aware that this is **NOT** a change to policy to enforce clang-format or any other developer guideline or process. Developers are free to use whatever tool they want, see also #18651.
Edit: Also includes a commit to bump the copyright headers, so that the touched files don't need to be touched again for that.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK fa4632c41714dfaa699bacc6a947d72668a4deef
jonatack:
ACK fa4632c41714dfaa, light review and sanity checks with gcc build and clang fuzz build
Tree-SHA512: 130a8d073a379ba556b1e64104d37c46b671425c0aef0ed725fd60156a95e8dc83fb6f0b5330b2f8152cf5daaf3983b4aca5e75812598f2626c39fd12b88b180
38677274f931088218eeb1f258077d3387f39c89 rpc: settxfee respects -maxtxfee wallet setting (Fabian Jahr)
bda84a08a0ac92dff6cadc99cf9bb8c3fadd7e13 rpc: Add documentation for deactivating settxfee (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
~~Closes 18315~~
`settxfee` can be deactivated by passing 0 as the fee. That does not seem to be documented for the user so this PR adds it in the description. The return value of a simple boolean seems also too simplified given the multiple dimensions that this deactivation feature enables. I.e. it does not seem intuitive if the returned boolean shows that the call succeeded or if means that `settxfee` is active. My suggested solution is to change the return value to a JSON object that included the "active" state and the currently set fee rate.
Examples:
```
$ src/bitcoin-cli settxfee 0.0000000
{
"active": false,
"fee_rate": "0.00000000 BTC/kB"
}
$ src/bitcoin-cli settxfee 0.0001
{
"active": true,
"fee_rate": "0.00010000 BTC/kB"
}
```
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 38677274f931088218eeb1f258077d3387f39c89, seems useful to error out early instead of later #16257🕍
jonatack:
ACK 38677274f931088218eeb
meshcollider:
LGTM, utACK 38677274f931088218eeb1f258077d3387f39c89
Tree-SHA512: 642813b5cf6612abb4b6cb63728081a6bd1659d809e0149c8f56060b6da7253fee989b3b202854f3051df3773c966799af30b612648c466b099f00590f356548
a2324e4d3f47f084b07a364c9a360a0bf31e86a0 test: Improve naming and logging of avoid_reuse tests (Fabian Jahr)
1abbdac6777bc5396d17a6772c8176a354730997 wallet: Prefer full destination groups in coin selection (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
Fixes#17603 (together with #17843)
In the case of destination groups of >10 outputs existing in a wallet with `avoid_reuse` enabled, the grouping algorithm is adding left-over outputs as an "incomplete" group to the list of groups even when a full group has already been added. This leads to the strange behavior that if there are >10 outputs for a destination the transaction spending from that will effectively use `len(outputs) % 10` as inputs for that transaction.
From the original PR and the code comment I understand the correct behavior should be the usage of 10 outputs. I opted for minimal changes in the current code although there maybe optimizations possible for cases with >20 outputs on a destination this sounds like too much of an edge case right now.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
Re-ACK a2324e4
achow101:
ACK a2324e4d3f47f084b07a364c9a360a0bf31e86a0
kallewoof:
ACK a2324e4d3f47f084b07a364c9a360a0bf31e86a0
meshcollider:
Tested ACK a2324e4d3f47f084b07a364c9a360a0bf31e86a0 (verified the new test fails on master without this change)
Tree-SHA512: 4743779c5d469fcd16df5baf166024b1d3c8eaca151df1e8281b71df62b29541cf7bfee3f8ab48d83e3b34c9256e53fd38a7b146a54c79f9caa44cce3636971a
9b5950db8683f9b4be03f79ee0aae8a780b01a4b bnb: exit selection when best_waste is 0 (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
If we find a solution which has no waste, just use that. This solution
is what we would consider to be optimal, and other solutions we find
would have to also have 0 waste, so they are equivalent to the first
one with 0 waste. Thus we can optimize by just choosing the first one
with 0 waste.
Closes#18257
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
utACK 9b5950db86
meshcollider:
utACK 9b5950db8683f9b4be03f79ee0aae8a780b01a4b
Tree-SHA512: 59565ff4a3d8281e7bc0ce87065a34c8d8bf8a95f628ba96b4fe89f1274979165aea6312e5f1f21b418c8c484aafc5166d22d9eff9d127a8192498625d58c557
