55b931934a34bab11446e8eed7bdaef92bb056de removed duplicate calling of GetDescriptorScriptPubKeyMan (Saikiran)
Pull request description:
Removed duplicate call to GetDescriptorScriptPubKeyMan and
Instead of checking linearly I have used find method so time complexity reduced significantly for GetDescriptorScriptPubKeyMan
after this fix improved performance of importdescriptor part refs https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/32013.
**Steps to reproduce in testnet environment**
**Input size:** 2 million address in the wallet
**Step1:** call importaddresdescriptor rpc method
observe the time it has taken.
**With the provided fix:**
Do the same steps again
observe the time it has taken.
There is a huge improvement in the performance. (previously it may take 5 to 6 seconds now it will take 1 seconds or less)
main changes i've made during this pr:
1. remove duplicate call to GetDescriptorScriptPubKeyMan method
2. And inside GetDescriptorScriptPubKeyMan method previously we checking **each address linearly** so each time it is calling HasWallet method which has aquired lock.
3. Now i've modified this logic call **find method on the map (O(logn)**) time it is taking, so only once we calling HasWallet method.
**Note:** Smaller inputs in the wallet you may not see the issue but huge wallet size it will definitely impact the performance.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 55b931934a34bab11446e8eed7bdaef92bb056de
w0xlt:
ACK 55b931934a
Tree-SHA512: 4a7fdbcbb4e55bd034e9cf28ab4e7ee3fb1745fc8847adb388c98a19c952a1fb66d7b54f0f28b4c2a75a42473923742b4a99fb26771577183a98e0bcbf87a8ca
fa86190e6ed2aeda7bcceaf96f52403816bcd751 rpc: Allow fullrbf fee bump (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The RPCs (psbt)bumpfee, and the GUI, reject fee bumps when BIP 125 signalling is absent in the transaction even when the mempool and other RPCs allow them. Fix the confusion by allowing the fee bump.
This is done after fullrbf is always on (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30592)
ACKs for top commit:
1440000bytes:
reACK fa86190e6e
achow101:
ACK fa86190e6ed2aeda7bcceaf96f52403816bcd751
w0xlt:
ACK fa86190e6e
rkrux:
reACK fa86190e6ed2aeda7bcceaf96f52403816bcd751
glozow:
ACK fa86190e6ed2aeda7bcceaf96f52403816bcd751
Tree-SHA512: b2ffe8dcadbe71e9be767a16cf8aa0bf383c2de7aa1aee9438d125f444e24f3f7e4f02ddb28981bd3b8b645b6a24a407b4ad6bb0b21946ae637e78f6386e05bf
Also, fix the incorrect documention of the 'replaceable' RPC argument
with respect to sequence number handling. The docs were incorrect
before, so the fix could be extracted, but it seems fine to include here
as well.
Removed duplicate call to GetDescriptorScriptPubKeyMan and
Instead of checking linearly I have used find method so time complexity reduced significantly for GetDescriptorScriptPubKeyMan
after this fix improved performance of importdescriptor part refs #32013.
The `QWARN()` macro internally uses `QTest::qWarn()`, which has been
deprecated since Qt 6.3. Replacing it with `qWarning()` ensures
compatibility across all Qt versions.
Instead of applying internal-ness to all keys being imported at the same
time, apply it on a per key basis. So each key that is imported will
carry with it whether it is for the change keypool.
Since we have a mockable wallet database, we don't really need to be
using BDB or SQLite's in-memory database capabilities. It doesn't really
help us to be using those as we aren't doing anything that requires one
type of db over the other, and will just prefer SQLite if it's
available.
MockableDatabase is suitable for these uses, so use
CreateMockableWalletDatabase to use that.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i "s/CreateMockWalletDatabase(options)/CreateMockableWalletDatabase()/" $(git grep -l "CreateMockWalletDatabase(options)" -- ":(exclude)src/wallet/walletdb.*")
sed -i "s/CreateMockWalletDatabase/CreateMockableWalletDatabase/" $(git grep -l "CreateMockWalletDatabase" -- ":(exclude)src/wallet/walletdb.*")
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
Instead of storing and passing around fixed strings for the purpose of
an address, use an enum.
This also rationalizes the CAddressBookData struct, documenting all fields and
making them public, and simplifying the representation to avoid bugs like
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26761#discussion_r1134615114 and make
it not possible to invalid address data like change addresses with labels.
Co-authored-by: Ryan Ofsky <ryan@ofsky.org>
The following cases were covered:
Case 1: No coin control selected coins.
- 'useAvailableBalance' should fill the amount edit box with the total available balance.
Case 2: With coin control selected coins.
- 'useAvailableBalance' should fill the amount edit box with the sum of the selected coins values.
9a1d73fdffa4f35e33bc187ac9b3afbba28b1950 Fix segfault when shutdown during wallet open (John Moffett)
Pull request description:
Fixes#689
## Summary
If you open a wallet and send a shutdown signal during that process, you'll get a segfault when the wallet finishes opening. That's because the `WalletController` object gets deleted manually in bitcoin.cpp during shutdown, but copies of the pointer (and pointers to child objects) are dangling in various places and are accessed in queued events after the deletion.
## Details
The issue in #689 is caused by the following sequence of events:
1. Wallet open modal dialog is shown and worker thread does the actual work.
2. Every 200ms, the main event loop checks to see if a shutdown has been requested, but only if a modal is not being shown.
3. Request a shutdown while the modal window is shown.
4. The wallet open process completes, the modal window is dismissed, and various `finish` signals are sent.
5. During handling of one of the `finish` signals, `qApp->processEvents()` is [called](e9262ea32a/src/qt/sendcoinsdialog.cpp (L603)), which causes the main event loop to detect the shutdown (now that the modal window has been dismissed). The `WalletController` and all the `WalletModel`s are [deleted](65de8eeeca/src/qt/bitcoin.cpp (L394-L401)).
6. Control returns to the `finish` method, which eventually tries to send a [signal](e9262ea32a/src/qt/sendcoinsdialog.cpp (L167)) from a wallet model, but it's been deleted already (and the signal is sent from a now-[dangling](d8bdee0fc8/src/qt/walletview.cpp (L65)) pointer).
The simplest fix for that is to change the `qApp->processEvents()` into a `QueuedConnection` call. (The `qApp->processEvents() was a [workaround](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/593#issuecomment-3050699) to get the GUI to scroll to the last item in a list that just got added, and this is just a safer way of doing that).
However, once that segfault is fixed, another segfault occurs due to some queued wallet events happening after the wallet controller object is deleted here:
65de8eeeca/src/qt/bitcoin.cpp (L394-L401)
Since `m_wallet_controller` is a copy of that pointer in `bitcoingui.cpp`, it's now dangling and `if(null)` checks won't work correctly. For instance, this line:
65de8eeeca/src/qt/bitcoingui.cpp (L413)
sets up a `QueuedConnection` to `setCurrentWallet`, but by the time control reaches that method (one event cycle after shutdown deleted `m_wallet_controller` in `bitcoin.cpp`), the underlying objects have been destroyed (but the pointers are still dangling).
Ideally, we'd use a `QPointer` or `std::shared_ptr / std::weak_ptr`s for these, but the changes would be more involved.
This is a minimal fix for the issues. Just set `m_wallet_controller` to `nullptr` in `bitcoingui.cpp`, check its value in a couple places, and avoid a use of `qApp->processEvents`.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 9a1d73fdffa4f35e33bc187ac9b3afbba28b1950, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK.
furszy:
ACK 9a1d73fdff
Tree-SHA512: a1b94676eb2fcb7606e68fab443b1565b4122aab93c35382b561842a049f4b43fecc459535370d67a64d6ebc4bcec0ebcda981fff633ebd41bdba6f7093ea540
If you open a wallet and send a shutdown signal during
that process, the GUI will segfault due to some queued
wallet events happening after the wallet controller
is deleted. This is a minimal fix for those issues.
This is a refactor, putting the burden to think about thread safety to
the caller. Otherwise, there is a risk that the caller will assume
thread safety where none exists, as is evident in the previous two
commits.
4584d300a40bfd84517072f7a6eee114fb7cab08 GUI: remove now unneeded 'm_balances' field from overviewpage (furszy)
050e8b139145d6991e740b0e5f2b3364663dd348 GUI: 'getAvailableBalance', use cached balance if the user did not select UTXO manually (furszy)
96e3264a82c51b456703f500bd98e8cb98115697 GUI: use cached balance in overviewpage and sendcoinsdialog (furszy)
321335bf0292034d79afa6c44f7f072942b6cc3c GUI: add getter for WalletModel::m_cached_balances field (furszy)
e62958dc81d215a1c56318d0914dfd9a33d45973 GUI: sendCoinsDialog, remove duplicate wallet().getBalances() call (furszy)
Pull request description:
As per the title says, we are recalculating the entire wallet balance on different situations calling to `wallet().getBalances()`, when should instead make use of the wallet model cached balance.
This has the benefits of (1) not spending resources calculating a balance that we already have cached, and (2) avoid blocking the main thread for a long time, in case of big wallets, walking through the entire wallet's tx map more than what it's really needed.
Changes:
1) Fix: `SendCoinsDialog` was calling `wallet().getBalances()` twice during `setModel`.
2) Use the cached balance if the user did not select any UTXO manually inside the wallet model `getAvailableBalance` call.
-----------------------
As an extra note, this work born in [#25005](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25005) but grew out of scope of it.
ACKs for top commit:
jarolrod:
ACK 4584d300a40bfd84517072f7a6eee114fb7cab08
hebasto:
re-ACK 4584d300a40bfd84517072f7a6eee114fb7cab08, only suggested changes and commit message formatting since my [recent](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/598#pullrequestreview-1071268192) review.
Tree-SHA512: 6633ce7f9a82a3e46e75aa7295df46c80a4cd4a9f3305427af203c9bc8670573fa8a1927f14a279260c488cc975a08d238faba2e9751588086fea1dcf8ea2b28
Plus, calculate the cached balance right when the wallet model, so the wallet widgets don't need to redo the same balance calculation multiple times when they are waiting for the model balance polling timer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
test wise: `WalletTests` now need to trigger the walletModel balance changed manually. So the model updates its internal state and can be used by the widgets.
This is because the test does not start the balance polling timer, in the same way as does not initialize several parts of the GUI workflow. All the objects (wallet, models, views, etc) that are used on this test are manually created instead of using the `WalletController` class flow.
Rationale is that this unit test is focused on verifying the GUI widgets/views behavior only: update the presented information, etc. when they receive different signals and/or function calls from outside (in other words, focus is on the signal slots/receiver side). It's not about whether the wallet balance polling timer is functioning as expected or not (which we definitely create a new test case for it in a follow-up work).
230a2f4cc3fab9f66b6c24ba809ddbea77755cb7 wallet test: Add unit test for wallet scan save_progress option (Ryan Ofsky)
a89ddfbe22b6db5beda678c9493e08fec6144122 wallet: Save wallet scan progress (w0xlt)
Pull request description:
Currently, the wallet scan progress is not saved.
If it is interrupted, it will be necessary to start from scratch on the next load.
This PR changes this and the progress is saved right after checking a block.
Close https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/25010
ACKs for top commit:
furszy:
re-ACK 230a2f4
achow101:
ACK 230a2f4cc3fab9f66b6c24ba809ddbea77755cb7
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 230a2f4cc3fab9f66b6c24ba809ddbea77755cb7. Only change since last review is tweaking whitespace and adding log print
Tree-SHA512: 1a9dec207ed22b3443fb06a4daf967637bc02bcaf71c070b7dc33605d0cab959551e4014c9e92293a63f54c5cbcc98bb9f8844a8c60bc32a1482b1c4130fab32
Currently, the wallet scan progress is not saved.
If it is interrupted, it will be necessary to start from
scratch on the next load.
With this change, progress is saved every 60 seconds.
Co-authored-by: furszy <matiasfurszyfer@protonmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jon Atack <jon@atack.com>
Co-authored-by: Ryan Ofsky <ryan@ofsky.org>
This is just the first of multiple settings that will be stored in the bitcoin
persistent setting file and shared with bitcoind, instead of being stored as Qt
settings backed by the windows registry or platform specific config files which
are ignored by bitcoind.
Co-Authored-By: furszy <matiasfurszyfer@protonmail.com>
31122aa979c4c9a40e276cfc44243420c367ba4f refactor: Pass interfaces::Node references to OptionsModel constructor (Ryan Ofsky)
Pull request description:
Giving OptionsModel access to the node interface is needed as part of #602 to get bitcoind and bitcoin-qt to use the same settings instead of different settings.
It has been split off from #602 to simplify that PR. Previously these commits were part of bitcoin/bitcoin#15936 and also had some review discussion there.
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
Code review ACK 31122aa979c4c9a40e276cfc44243420c367ba4f.
furszy:
Code ACK 31122aa9
jarolrod:
ACK 31122aa979c4c9a40e276cfc44243420c367ba4f
Tree-SHA512: b8529322fd7ba97e19864129e6cf5f9acc58c124f2e5a7c50aca15772c8549de3c24e8b0c27e8cf2c06fd26529e9cdb898b0788a1de3cbfdfbdd3f85c9f0fe69
Will allow OptionsModel to read/write settings to the node settings.json
file and share settings with the node, instead of storing them
externally in QSettings.
Co-authored-by: Vasil Dimov <vd@FreeBSD.org>
Name has been confusing since it was introduced, and it was pointed in
recent review club as https://bitcoincore.reviews/10102 that it was
particularly unclear how interfaces::WalletClient was different from
interfaces::Wallet.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
ren() { git grep -l "$1" src | xargs sed -i "s/$1/$2/g"; }
ren WalletClient WalletLoader
ren walletClient walletLoader
ren wallet_client wallet_loader
ren "wallet clients release the wallet" "wallet pointer owners release the wallet"
ren "wallet client" "wallet loader"
ren "Wallet client" "Wallet loader"
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
Introduce convention to use const shared pointers everywhere, unless the shared pointer is modified at some point, which it very rarely is.
We want this convention, as it helps alleviate the misconception that a const shared pointer somehow results in a pointer to an immutable object, which is false.
e4709c7b56612553fb7cbf16ef2d5099c5b732d0 Start using init makeNode, makeChain, etc methods (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
Use `interfaces::Init::make*` methods instead of `interfaces::Make*` functions, so interfaces can be constructed differently in different executable without having to change any code. (So for example `bitcoin-gui` can make an `interfaces::Node` pointer that communicates with a `bitcoin-node` subprocess, while `bitcoin-qt` can make an `interfaces::Node` pointer that controls node code in the same process.)
---
This PR is part of the [process separation project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/10). The commit was first part of larger PR #10102.
ACKs for top commit:
jamesob:
reACK e4709c7b56
achow101:
ACK e4709c7b56612553fb7cbf16ef2d5099c5b732d0
benthecarman:
utACK e4709c7b56612553fb7cbf16ef2d5099c5b732d0
Tree-SHA512: 580c1979dbb2ef444157c8e53041e70d15ddeee77e5cbdb34f70b6d228cc2d2fe3843825f172da84e506200c58f7e0932f7cd4c006bb5058c1f4e43259394834
Use interfaces::Init::make* methods instead of interfaces::Make*
functions, so interfaces can be constructed differently in different
executables without having to change any code. (So for example
bitcoin-gui can make an interfaces::Node pointer that communicates with
a bitcoin-node subprocess, while bitcoin-qt can make an interfaces::Node
pointer that starts node code in the same process.)
